Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:46:35.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epiphany and Browning: Character Made Manifest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Herbert F. Tucker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fortunes of epiphany indicate both recent historical disparities within literary criticism and current cultural disparities between academic and popular discourse. The contextualist practice of Wordsworth and Joyce, in contrast to the purist theory that arose with the New Criticism, suggests that epiphany is a narrative device underscoring the historical and cultural construction of character. This conception is borne out by the original Epiphany, in Matthew, which manifests divine personality to human eyes through an episode of cultural difference and accommodation. Robert Browning's historicist poetry uses comparable but secular means of manifesting personality. In his dramatic monologues “Karshish,” “My Star,” and ‘“Transcendentalism,”’ epiphanic themes serve as measures of their speakers’ cultural construction. In discerning the relative differentiae that characterize such speakers, Browning's readers encounter their own relativity to interpretive conditions. As these examples imply, the modern literary epiphany ultimately effects the hermeneutic manifestation of the reader.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 107 , Issue 5 , October 1992 , pp. 1208 - 1221
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abrams, M. H. Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature. New York: Norton, 1971.Google Scholar
Alter, Robert. The Art of Biblical Narrative. New York: Basic, 1981.Google Scholar
Beare, Francis W. The Gospel according to Matthew. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981.Google Scholar
Beja, Morris. “Epiphany and the Epiphanies.” A Companion to Joyce Studies. Ed. Bowen, Zack and Carens, James F. Westport: Greenwood, 1984. 707–70.Google Scholar
Beja, Morris. Epiphany in the Modern Novel. Seattle: U of Washington P, 1971.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence. New York: Oxford UP, 1973.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1961.Google Scholar
Bornstein, George. Poetic Remaking: The Art of Browning, Yeats, and Pound. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Bornstein, George. Transformations of Romanticism in Yeats, Eliot, and Stevens. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1976.Google Scholar
Bowen, Zack. “Joyce and the Epiphany Concept.” Journal of Modern Literature 9 (1981–82): 103–10.Google Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth, and Warren, R. P. Understanding Fiction. New York: Crofts, 1943.Google Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth, and Wimsatt, W. K. Literary Criticism: A Short History. New York: Knopf, 1957.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke. Garden City: Doubleday, 1977.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert. The Poems of Robert Browning. Ed. Pettigrew, John and Collins, Thomas J. 2 vols. New Haven: Yale UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert. The Ring and the Book. Ed. Altick, Richard. New Haven: Yale UP, 1971.Google Scholar
Chesterton, G. K. Robert Browning. London: Macmillan, 1903.Google Scholar
Christ, Carol T. Victorian and Modern Poetics. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984.Google Scholar
Clayton, Jay. Romantic Vision and the Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Donoghue, Denis. “Joyce and the Finite Order.” Sewanee Review 68 (1960): 256–25.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. The Waste Land and Other Poems. 1930. New York: Harcourt, 1934.Google Scholar
Farrar, Frederic W. The Life of Christ. London: Cassell, 1874.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. A Study of English Romanticism. New York: Random, 1968.Google Scholar
Guerra, Lia. “Fragmentation in Dubliners and the Reader's Epiphany.” Myriadminded Man: Jottings on Joyce. Ed. Bosinelli, R. M. et al. Bologna: Cooperativa, 1986. 41–49.Google Scholar
Hendry, Irene. “Joyce's Epiphanies.” Sewanee Review 54 (1946): 449–44.Google Scholar
Henry, Matthew, and Scott, Thomas. The Comprehensive Commentary on the Holy Bible. Ed. Jenks, William. Vol. 4. Brattleboro: Fessenden, 1834. 5 vols.Google Scholar
Bible, The Holy. King James Version. Cleveland: World, n.d.Google Scholar
Home, Thomas Hartwell. An Introduction to the Critical Study and Knowledge of the Holy Scriptures. 5th ed. Vol. 4. Philadelphia: Desilver, 1833. 4 vols.Google Scholar
Joyce, James. Stephen Hero. 1944. Rev. ed. New York: New Directions, 1955.Google Scholar
Joyce, Stanislaus. My Brother's Keeper: James Joyce's Early Years. New York: Viking, 1958.Google Scholar
Kenner, Hugh. Dublin's Joyce. London: Chatto, 1955.Google Scholar
Langbaum, Robert. “The Epiphanic Mode in Wordsworth and Modern Literature.” The Word from Below: Essays on Modern Literature and Culture. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1987. 33–57.Google Scholar
Langbaum, Robert. The Poetry of Experience: The Dramatic Monologue in Modern Literary Tradition. 1957. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar
Levin, Harry. James Joyce: A Critical Introduction. 1941. Rev. ed. New York: New Directions, 1960.Google Scholar
Martin, Loy D. Browning's Dramatic Monologues and the Post-Romantic Subject. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Nichols, Ashton. The Poetics of Epiphany: Nineteenth-Century Origins of the Modern Literary Moment. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P, 1987.Google Scholar
Nolan, Brian M. The Royal Son of God: The Christology of Matthew 1–2 in the Setting of the Gospel. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck, 1979.Google Scholar
Graece, Novum Testamentum. Ed. Alexander Souter. Oxford: Clarendon, 1910.Google Scholar
Patte, Daniel. The Gospel according to Matthew: A Structural Commentary on Matthew's Faith. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987.Google Scholar
Posnock, Ross. Henry James and the Problem of Robert Browning. Athens: U of Georgia P. 1985.Google Scholar
Pound, Ezra. Personae. New York: New Directions, 1926.Google Scholar
Prabhu, George M. Soares. The Formula Quotations in the Infancy Narrative of Matthew. Rome: Biblical Inst., 1976.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. The Symbolism of Evil. Trans. Buchanan, Emerson. New York: Harper, 1967.Google Scholar
Strauss, David Friedrich. The Life of Jesus. 4th ed. Trans. Evans, Marian. Vol. 1. London: Chapman, 1846. 3 vols.Google Scholar
Sumner, John Bird. Practical Exposition of the Gospels of St. Matthew and St. Mark. London: Hatchard, 1838.Google Scholar
Trench, R. C. The Star of the Wise Men: Being a Commentary on the Second Chapter of St. Matthew. Philadelphia: Hooker, 1850.Google Scholar
Tucker, Herbert F. “Dramatic Monologue and the Overhearing of Lyric.” Lyric Poetry: Beyond New Criticism. Ed. Hošek, Chaviva and Parker, Patricia. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985. 226–22.Google Scholar
Walzl, Florence L. “The Liturgy of the Epiphany Season and the Epiphanies of Joyce.” PMLA 80 (1965): 436–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskel, Thomas. The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure and Psychology of Transcendence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Whitla, William. The Central Truth: The Incarnation in Robert Browning's Poetry. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1963.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. Poetical Works. Ed. Hutchinson, Thomas. Rev. de Selincourt, Ernest. London: Oxford UP, 1969.Google Scholar