Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:26:36.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Cold War and Beyond in East Asian Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Norma Field*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Extract

Just before coming to the conference on the Relation between English and Foreign Languages in the Academy, I saw an exhibit at the Institute of American Indian Arts Museum in Santa Fe titled Who Stole the Teepee? Combining historic with contemporary objects, the exhibit probed not only the theft of tradition announced in its title but the possibility that “we” (Native Americans) or “our ancestors” had been more than willing to sell it. Such speculative reflection resonates with the way in which we who study East Asia have dealt with our relatively stable isolation: while complaining of language and literature colleagues' indifference, if not contempt, toward our endeavors, we have also prided ourselves on the difficulty of our languages and the ancientness of our civilizations, the source of an arcane body of knowledge requisite for even basic literacy. If all foreign language and literature scholars feel subordinate to the empire of English, East Asianists are not only beyond the pale but are often proud of it. Underlying this orientation is an important historical feature: even allowing for the mixed case of China, this region was not colonized by Great Britain. This has meant that it lacks a bourgeoisie that grew up speaking English. I shall return to colonial history below.

Type
What are the Factors that Brought Us to Where We are?
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Amin, Samir. Re-reading the Postwar Period: An Intellectual Itinerary. Trans. Michael Wolfers. New York: Monthly Review, 1994.Google Scholar
Chow, Rey. “The Politics and Pedagogy of Asian Literatures in American Universities.” Writing Diaspora: Tactics of Intervention in Contemporary Cultural Studies. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1993. 120–43.Google Scholar
Chow, Rey. “Theory, Area Studies, Cultural Studies: Issues of Pedagogy in Multiculturalism.” Ethics after Idealism: Theory-Culture-Ethnicity-Reading. Theories of Contemporary Culture 20. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1998. 113.Google Scholar
Field, Norma. “‘The Way of the World’: Japanese Literary Studies in the Postwar United States.” The Postwar Developments of Japanese Studies in the United States. Ed. Hardacre, Helen. Brill's Japanese Studies Lib. 8. Leiden: Brill, 1998. 227–93.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. “The Sokal Affair and the History of Criticism.” Critical Inquiry 28 (2002): 470508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar