Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:08:49.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breaking the Book Known as Q

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Coleman Hutchison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay considers a series of questions about the relations between material presentation and poetic meaning that emerge from a simple but under-acknowledged fact about the 1609 Shake-speares Sonnets quarto: unlike nearly every other sonnet sequence from the period, Q's poems are broken by a series of nonuniform, seemingly arbitrary page breaks. Arguing that these breaks have profound implications for the interpretation and reception of Shakespeare's poems, the essay suggests that not reading page breaks is itself a reading practice-a historically specific, socially determined act in which certain elements of materiality are granted attention and authority while others are not. Espousing instead an approach to the materiality of Shake-speares Sonnets that would take seriously the matter of Q's page breaks, this essay understands the page and the page break to be units of meaning with particularly urgent implications for the recognition of poetic form and for the interrelations between a history of the book and the idea of literature. (CH)

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 121 , Issue 1: Special Topic: The History of the Book and the Idea of Literature , January 2006 , pp. 33 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary Terms. 7th ed. Boston: Heinle, 1999.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H., et al., eds. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 7th ed. New York: Norton, 2000.Google Scholar
Auden, W. H. “Shakespeare's Sonnets.” Forewords and Afterwords. New York: Random, 1973.Google Scholar
Barnes, Barnabe. Parthenophil and Parthenophe. London, 1593.Google Scholar
Barnfield, Richard. Cynthia. London, 1595.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “Death of the Author.” Image, Music, Text. Trans. Heath, Stephen. New York: Hill, 1988. 142–48.Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony. “Texts in History: The Determinations of Readings and Their Texts.” Reception Study: From Literary Theory to Cultural Studies. Ed. Machor, James L. and Goldstein, Philip. New York: Routledge, 2001. 61–74.Google Scholar
Benson, John, ed. Poems: Written by Wil. Shake-speare, Gent. London, 1640.Google Scholar
Blayney, Peter W. M. The First Folio of Shakespeare. Washington: Folger Shakespeare Lib., 1991.Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen. “Commentary.” Booth, Shakespeare's Sonnets 135–583.Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen, ed. Shakespeare's Sonnets. By William Shakespeare. New Haven: Yale UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Bredbeck, Gregory W. Sodomy and Interpretation: Marlowe to Milton. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Rebecca W. A Culture of Teaching: Early Modern Humanism in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Cameron, Sharon. Choosing Not Choosing: Dickinson's Fascicles. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. “Laborers and Voyagers: From the Text to the Reader.” Diacritics 22 (1992): 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloud, Random. “Fiat Flux.” Crisis in Editing: Texts of the English Renaissance. Ed. McLeod, Randall. Conference on Editorial Problems, 4–5 Nov. 1988, U of Toronto. New York: AMS, 1994.Google Scholar
Constable, Henry. Diana. London, 1592.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan D. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Damrosch, David, et al., eds. The Longman Anthology of British Literature. 2nd ed. Vol. 1B: The Early Modern Period. London: Longman, 2002.Google Scholar
Daniel, Samuel. Delia. London, 1592.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta. “The Essential Author and the Material Book.” Textual Practice 2 (1988): 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta. “The Scandal of Shakespeare's Sonnets.” Shakespeare Survey 46 (1994): 35–49.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta. Shakespeare Verbatim: The Reproduction of Authenticity and the 1790 Apparatus. New York: Oxford UP, 1991.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta, and Stallybrass, Peter. “The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text.” Shakespeare Quarterly 44 (1993): 255–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drayton, Michael. Ideas Mirrour. London, 1594.Google Scholar
Dubrow, Heather. “‘Incertainties Now Crown Themselves Assur'd’: The Politics of Plotting Shakespeare's Sonnets.” Shakespeare's Sonnets: Critical Essays. Ed. Schiffer, James. New York: Garland, 1999. 113–34.Google Scholar
Dubrow, Heather. “Shakespeare's Undramatic Monologues: Toward a Reading of the Sonnets.” Shakespeare Quarterly 32 (1981): 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Introduction. Duncan-Jones, Shakespeare's Sonnets 1–105.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine, ed. Shakespeare's Sonnets. By William Shakespeare. London: Arden, 1997.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine. “Was the 1609 Shake-speares Sonnets Really Unauthorized?” Review of English Studies ns 34 (1983): 151–71.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine. “What Are Shakespeare's Sonnets Called?” Essays in Criticism 47 (1997): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, Joel. Shakespeare's Perjured Eye: The Invention of Poetic Subjectivity in the Sonnets. Berkeley: U of California P, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Giles. Licia. Cambridge, 1593.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” The Foucault Reader.Google Scholar
Ed. Rabinow, Paul. New York: Pantheon, 1984. 101–20. Freinkel, Lisa. Reading Shakespeare's Will: The Theology of Figure from Augustine to the Sonnets. New York: Columbia UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Fussell, Paul. Poetic Meter and Poetic Form. Rev. ed. New York: Random, 1979.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Philip. A New Introduction to Bibliography. New Castle: Oak Knoll, 1995.Google Scholar
Gibaldi, Joseph. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 6th ed. New York: MLA, 2003.Google Scholar
Giroux, Robert. The Book Known as Q: A Consideration of Shakespeare's Sonnets. New York: Atheneum, 1982.Google Scholar
Griffin, Bartholomew. Fidessa. London, 1596.Google Scholar
Jackson, MacDonald P. “Punctuation and the Compositors of Shakespeare's Sonnets, 1609.” The Library 5th ser. 30 (1975): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastan, David Scott. Shakespeare and the Book. New York: Cambridge UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Kuin, Roger. Chamber Music: Elizabethan Sonnet-Sequences and the Pleasure of Criticism. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linche, Richard. Diella. London, 1596.Google Scholar
Lodge, Thomas. Phillis. London, 1593Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. Manuscript, Print, and the English Renaissance Lyric. Ithaca: Cornell UP 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. “Shakespeare's Sonnets as Literary Property.” Soliciting Interpretation: Literary Theory and Seventeenth-Century English Poetry. Ed. Harvey, Elizabeth D. and Maus, Katharine Eisaman. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990. 143–73.Google Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey. “Pressing Subjects; or, The Secret Lives of Shakespeare's Compositors.” Language Machines: Technologies of Literary and Cultural Production. Ed. Masten, Peter Stallybrass, and Vickers, Nancy. New York: Routledge, 1997. 75–107.Google Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey. “Textual Deviance: Ganymede's Hand in As You Like It.” Field Work: Sites in Literary and Cultural Studies. Ed. Garber, Marjorie, Franklin, Paul B., and Walkowitz, Rebecca L. New York: Routledge, 1996. 153–63.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome J. A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1983.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. “Stretching a Point; or, The Case of the Spaced-Out Comps.” Studies in Bibliography 37 (1984): 106–21.Google Scholar
McLeod, Randall. “Gerard Hopkins and the Shapes of His Sonnets.” Voice, Text, Hypertext: Emerging Practices in Textual Studies. Ed. Modiano, Raimonda, Searle, Leroy F., and Shillingsburg, Peter L. Seattle: U of Washington P, 2004. 177–297.Google Scholar
McLeod, Randall. “Unemending Shakespeare's Sonnet 111.” Studies in English Literature 21 (1981): 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moxon, Joseph. Mechanick Exercises on the Whole Art of Printing (1683–4). 2nd ed. Ed. Davis, Herbert and Carter, Harry. London: Oxford UP, 1962.Google Scholar
The Passionate Pilgrime. London, 1612.Google Scholar
Pequigney, Joseph. Such Is My Love: A Study of Shakespeare's Sonnets. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar
Percy, William. Sonnets to the Fairest Coelia. London, 1594.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sasha. Reading Shakespeare's Poems in Early Modern England. New York: Palgrave, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollins, Hyder Edward, ed. A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare: The Sonnets. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1944.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia UP, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. Poetic Closure: A Study of How Poems End. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1968.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce R. Homosexual Desire in Shakespeare's England: A Cultural Poetics. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991.Google Scholar
Smith, William. Chloris. London, 1596.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. Amoretti and Epithalamion. London, 1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, Michael R. G. The Development of the Sonnet: An Introduction. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter. “Editing as Cultural Formation: The Sexing of Shakespeare's Sonnets.” Modern Language Quarterly 54 (1993): 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Targoff, Ramie. “Poets in Print: The Case of Herbert's Temple.” Word and Image 17 (2001): 140–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Gary. “Some Manuscripts of Shakespeare's Sonnets.” Bulletin of John Rylands Library 68 (1985): 210–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tofte, Robert. Laura. London, 1597. Tribble, Evelyn B. Margins and Marginality: The Printed Page in Early Modern England. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1993.Google Scholar
Vendler, Helen. The Art of Shakespeare's Sonnets. Cambridge: Belknap–Harvard UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Wall, Wendy. The Imprint of Gender: Authorship and Publication in the English Renaissance. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Warren, Robert Penn. Incarnations: Poems 1966–1968. New York: Random, 1968.Google Scholar
Watson, Thomas. The Hekatompathia; or, Passionate Centurie of Loue Diuided into Two Parts. London, 1582.Google Scholar
Zepheria. London, 1594.Google Scholar
Zwicker, Stephen N. “The Reader Revealed.” The Reader Revealed. Ed. Brown, SabrinaAlcorn. Washington: Folger Shakespeare Lib., 2001.Google Scholar