Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:51:58.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aldous Huxley as Literary Critic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Hans W. Hausermann*
Affiliation:
Zuoz College

Extract

Although Aldous Huxley's personality as a writer is individual enough to defy classification, it is easier to understand some aspects of his work if he is treated in connection with the movement of reaction against Victorianism. This reaction had already passed through two successive phases when he joined it. During the nineties it was the school of Oscar Wilde which protested against the unadventurous, hypocritical, and smug spirit pervading the poetry of the Victorians and held up its own conception of art for art's sake. The narrowness and also the dangers of this “decadent” doctrine (which was inspired by the French Parnassians and Symbolists) were realized already before the close of the century by a few young writers who in their works endowed life with a deeper meaning. This new phase in the gradual separation from the Victorian ideals begins with the social satires of Bernard Shaw, receives greater strength through the addition of the continental influence of Ibsen, Tolstoy, and Nietzsche, and, finally, derives its strongest impulse from the then dominant force in Western culture, science. Literature is invaded by a host of new facts, methods, and points of view, due to the recent development of such sciences as biology, psychology, and sociology. The traditional literary moulds proved too narrow, and the looser, bolder forms of such writers as Balzac, Zola, and Dostoievsky were taken as models. This movement reached its climax in such novelists as Galsworthy, H. G. Wells, and Aldous Huxley.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 1933 , pp. 908 - 918
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vulgarity in Literature (London, 1930), p. 20: “Literature is also philosophy, is also science. In terms of beauty it enunciates truths.”

2 British Encyclopaedia, article on T. H. Huxley.

3 Vulgarity in Literature, pp. 50–51.

4 The Athenaeum (December 10, 1920), Along the Road, p. 45.

5 The Athenaeum (August 27, 1920).

6 Crome Yellow (London, 1928), pp. 106–108.

7 The Athenaeum (December 10, 1920), and Along the Road, (London, 1928), p. 45.

8 Jesting Pilate (London, 1930), p. 259.

9 Vulgarity in Literature, p. 46.

10 Ibid., pp. 51–54.

11 The Athenaeum (August 22, 1919).

12 Proper Studies (London, 1929), p. 187.

13 The Athenaeum (July 23, 1920).

14 On the Margin, p. 164.

15 Ibid., p. 161.

16 The Athenaeum (September 12, 1919).

17 Jesting Pilate, p. 57.

18 The Athenaeum (September 19, 1919), and On the Margin, p. 36.

19 On the Margin, pp. 35–38.

20 The Athenaeum (July 4, 1919).

21 Ibid. (September 24, 1920).

22 Ibid. (November 7, 1919).

23 Proper Studies, p. 247.

24 Ibid.

25 Vulgarity in Literature, pp. 38–40.

26 Ibid., pp. 37–38.

27 Those Barren Leaves (London, 1927), p. 207.

28 P. Lubbock, The Craft of Fiction (London: J. Cape, 1926), p. 272.

29 Along the Road, p. 33.

30 P. Lubbock, The Craft of Fiction, p. 251.

31 On the Margin, pp. 156–160.

32 Point Counter Point, end of chapter x.

33 The Athenaeum (December 17, 1920).

34 Vulgarity in Literature, pp. 10–14.

35 Ibid., pp. 18–22.

36 Jesting Pilate, p. 91.