Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xlmdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-11T00:49:59.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AI and the Everyday Writer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2024

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Berdejo-Espinola, Violeta, and Amano, Tatsuya. “AI Tools Can Improve Equity in Science.Science, vol. 379, no. 6636, 9 Mar. 2023, p. 991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Deborah. The Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy. Cambridge UP, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Deborah. “‘Who's the President?’: Ghostwriting and Shifting Values in Literacy.College English, vol. 69, no. 6, July 2007, pp. 549–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. “The Place of World Englishes in Composition: Pluralization Continued.College Composition and Communication, vol. 57, no. 4, June 2006, pp. 586619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth, et al. “All That's ‘Human’ Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Text.” arXiv, 2021, arxiv.org/abs/2107.00061.Google Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. “AI and the Humanities.PMLA, vol. 135, no. 3, May 2020, pp. 449–54.Google Scholar
Gao, Catherine A., et al.Comparing Scientific Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT to Real Abstracts with Detectors and Blinded Human Reviewers.NPJ Digital Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, Laura. “Fostering Learning, Curiosity, and Community in the Age of Generative AI.English Education, vol. 55, no. 3, Mar. 2023, pp. 214–16.Google Scholar
Kirschenbaum, Matthew. Track Changes: A Literary History of Word Processing. Harvard UP, 2016.Google Scholar
Knowles, Alan M.Machine-in-the-Loop Writing: Optimizing the Rhetorical Load.Computers and Composition, vol. 71, 2024, article no. 102826, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordling, Linda. “How ChatGPT Is Transforming the Postdoc Experience.Nature, vol. 622, 2023, pp. 655–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigg, Stacey. “Research Writing with ChatGPT: A Descriptive Embodied Practice Framework.Computers and Composition, vol. 71, 2024, article no. 102830, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, Zoe A., et al. “Fears about AI-Mediated Communication Are Grounded in Different Expectations for One's Own versus Others’ Use.” arXiv, 2023, arxiv.org/abs/2305.01670.Google Scholar