Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:26:09.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why the Humanities Matter for Race Studies Today

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

We have no Adequate Lexicon for dealing with the transformation of racial orders. Recently, commentators have sought to pinpoint a shift in racial meanings by announcing the advent of a “postidentity,” “postracial,” or “cosmopolitan” social order. These appellations suggest that we are now past racial or identity politics in some crucial way. But it is not so much that we have gone beyond race as that race has gone beyond us, morphing at a speed with which academic expertise has not kept pace. The content of racial, gender, and sexual identities has been significantly transformed, and this change has, in turn, fostered the illusion that we no longer inhabit racialized realities—hence the proliferation of posts to tell us that temporally and politically we are no longer where we were. The representational strain of dealing with the elusive and dynamic qualities of racial and sexual identities makes us too eager to declare that we are over difference. The recourse to posts seems, however, more an admission of helplessness at identifying the nature of the shift than a sign of transcendence. It stems from our dependence on social schemas that offer us only two options: we are in the racial order or we are out of it. But we are not out of it, not yet. And herein lies a rare opening for the humanistic study of race.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ellison, Ralph. Invisible Man. New York: Vintage, 1990.Google Scholar
Ford, Richard Thompson. The Race Card: How Bluffing about Bias Makes Race Relations Worse. New York: Farrar, 2008.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. “New Ethnicities.” Black British Cultural Studies: A Reader. Ed. Baker, Houston A., Diawara, Manthia, and Lindeborg, Ruth H. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1996. 163–72.Google Scholar
Kingston, Maxine Hong. The Woman Warrior: Memoirs of a Girlhood among Ghosts. New York: Vintage, 1989.Google Scholar
Kogawa, Joy. Obasan. New York: Doubleday, 1994.Google Scholar
Koshy, Susan. “Morphing Race into Ethnicity: Asian Americans and Critical Transformations of Whiteness.” Boundary 2 28.1 (2001): 153–94.Google Scholar
Lee, Chang-rae. Native Speaker. New York: Riverhead, 1995.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Trans. Georges Van Den Abbeele. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1988.Google Scholar
McGeveran, Tom. “Toni Morrison's Letter to Barack Obama.” New York Observer 28 Jan. 2008. 2 Feb. 2008 <http://www.observer.com/2008/toni-morrisons-letter-barack-obama>.Google Scholar
Omi, Michael, and Winant, Howard. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar