Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:32:45.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Law of Torts and the Logic of Lynching in Charles Chesnutt's The Marrow of Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Trinyan Mariano
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tort law, which governs civil wrongs, coalesced during the late nineteenth century as courts became increasingly willing to compensate injured people. Its history, however, has been told without reference to issues of race or compensation for slavery and its aftermath. In the novel The Marrow of Tradition (1901), Charles Chesnutt stretches tort discourse by using its principle of corrective justice to theorize liability for racial injustice and so discovers what law suppresses—the problem of collateral consequences when responsibility is made a function of race. Not only does corrective justice reach an operational limit when the enormity of the wrong exceeds the ability to pay, but using race to assess liability aligns corrective justice with the logic behind the southern practice of lynching. Recovering Chesnutt's use of tort challenges the dominance of contract law as the framework for reading Marrow and revises our historical understanding of the significance of reparations.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 128 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 559 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Andrews, William. The Literary Career of Charles W. Chesnutt. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Bancroft, Hubert Howe. Popular Tribunals. Vol. 1. San Francisco, 1887. GoogleBooks. Web. 23 Feb. 2011.Google Scholar
Barkan, Elazar. The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. New York: Norton, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Bentley, Nancy. “The Strange Career of Love and Slavery: Chesnutt, Engels, Masoch.” American Literary History 17.3 (2005): 460–85. Print.Google Scholar
Bishop, Joel Prentiss. Commentaries on the Non-contract Law and Especially as to Common Affairs Not of Contract or the Every-day Rights and Torts. Chicago: Flood, 1889. The Making of Modern Law: Legal Treatises, 1800-1926. Web. 30 Mar. 2011.Google Scholar
Chesnutt, Charles W. The Marrow of Tradition. 1901. New York: Penguin, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Chesnutt, Helen. Charles Waddell Chesnutt: Pioneer of the Color Line. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1952. Print.Google Scholar
Cooley, Thomas McIntyre. A Treatise on the Law of Torts; or, The Wrongs Which Arise Independent of Contract. Chicago: Callaghan, 1880. The Making of Modern Law: Legal Treatises, 1800-1926. Web. 29 Mar. 2011.Google Scholar
Crane, Gregg D. Race, Citizenship, and Law in American Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielson, Susan. “Charles Chesnutt's Dilemma: Professional Ethics, Social Justice, and Domestic Feminism in The Marrow of Tradition.” Southern Literary Journal 41.1 (2008): 73–92. Project Muse. Web. 2 Dec. 2011.Google Scholar
Delmar, Jay. “The Moral Dilemma in Charles W. Chesnutt's The Marrow of Tradition.” American Literary Realism 14.2 (1981): 269–72. Print.Google Scholar
De Santis, Christopher. “The Dangerous Marrow of Southern Tradition: Charles W. Chesnutt, Paul Laurence Dunbar, and the Paternalist Ethos at the Turn of the Century.” Southern Quarterly 38.2 (2000): 79–97. Wilson Web. Web. 2 Nov. 2009.Google Scholar
DeSantis, John. “North Carolina City Confronts Its Past in Report on White Vigilantes.” The New York Times. New York Times, 19 Dec. 2005. Web. 12 Apr. 2011.Google Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. Residues of Justice: Literature, Law, Philosophy. Berkeley: U of California P, 1996. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, Frederick. “Lynch Law in the South.” North American Review July 1892: 17-24. Google Books. Web. 23 Feb. 2011.Google Scholar
Ellison, Curtis W., and Metcalf, E. W. Jr. Charles W. Chesnutt: A Reference Guide. Boston: Hall, 1977. Print.Google Scholar
Foner, Eric. Forever Free: The Story of Emancipation and Reconstruction. New York: Knopf, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. A History of American Law. 2nd ed. New York: Simon, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Giles, James, and Lally, Thomas. “Allegory in Chesnutt's Marrow of Tradition.” JGE: The Journal of General Education 35.4 (1984): 259–69. Print.Google Scholar
Gleason, William. “Voices at the Nadir: Charles Chesnutt and David Bryant Fulton.” American Literary Realism 24.3 (1992): 22–41. Print.Google Scholar
Gunning, Sandra. Race, Rape, and Lynching: The Red Record of American Literature, 1890-1912. New York: Oxford UP, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Harris, Trudier. Exorcising Blackness: Historical and Literary Lynching and Burning Rituals. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Hartman, Saidiya V. Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Oxford UP, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. The Transformation of American Law, 1780-1860. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1977. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ifill, Sherrilyn A. On the Courthouse Lawn: Confronting the Legacy of Lynching in the Twenty-First Century. Boston: Beacon, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Nathan. “Fault and Liability: Two Views of Legal Development.” Harvard Law Review 31.7 (1918): 954–79. HeinOnline. Web. 30 Mar. 2011.Google Scholar
Levin, Joel. Tort Wars. New York: Cambridge UP, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathewson, Gwen. “Challenging the Court: Charles Chesnutt's Marrow of Tradition.” Literature and Law. Ed. Meyer, Michael J. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2004. 219–40. Print.Google Scholar
McFatter, Susan. “From Revenge to Resolution: The (R)evolution of Female Characters in Chesnutt's Fiction.” CLA Journal 42.2 (1998): 194–211. Print.Google Scholar
McGowan, Todd. “Acting without the Father: Charles Chesnutt's New Aristocrat.” American Literary Realism 30.1 (1997): 59–74. Print.Google Scholar
Michaels, Walter Benn. The Trouble with Diversity: How We Learned to Love Identity and Ignore Inequality. New York: Holt, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Moddelmog, William. “Lawful Entitlements: Chesnutt's Fictions of Ownership.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 41.1 (1999): 47–69. Print.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie G. “Forgiveness and Resentment.” Forgiveness and Mercy. By Murphy and Jean Hampton. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1988. 14–34. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najmi, Samina. “Janet, Polly, and Olivia: Constructs of Blackness and White Femininity in Charles Chesnutt's The Marrow of Tradition. Southern Literary Journal 32.1 (1999): 1–19. Academic Search Premier. Web. 2 Nov. 2005.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. “Equity and Mercy.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22.2 (1993): 83–125. Print.Google Scholar
Pettis, Joyce. “The Literary Imagination and the Historic Event: Chesnutt's Use of History in The Marrow of Tradition.” South Atlantic Review 55.4 (1990): 37–48. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickens, Ernestine Williams. Charles W. Chesnutt and the Progressive Movement. New York: Pace UP, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Plessy, v. Ferguson. 163 US 537-64. Supreme Court of the US. 1896. Westlaw. Web. 23 Feb. 2011.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. “The Concept of Corrective Justice in Recent Theories of Tort Law.” Journal of Legal Studies 10.1 (1981): 187–206. Westlaw. Web. 2 Apr. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, William L. Handbook of the Law of Torts. Saint Paul: West, 1941. Print.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. “Compensation and Commensurability.” Duke Law Journal 43.1 (1994): 56–86. Westlaw. Web. 20 Feb. 2011.Google Scholar
Reilly, John M. “The Dilemma in Chesnutt's The Marrow of Tradition.” Phylon 32.1 (1971): 31–38. JSTOR. Web. 12 Apr. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company. 87 NY 382-401. Court of Appeals of NY. 1882. Westlaw. Web. 2 Apr. 2012.Google Scholar
Robinson, Angelo Rich. “Race, Place, and Space: Remaking Whiteness in the Post-Reconstruction South.” Southern Literary Journal 35.1 (2002): 97–107. Literary Reference Center. Web. 5 June 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Shirley, ed. The Culture of Sentiment: Race, Gender, and Sentimentality in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Oxford UP, 1992. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, Eric. Introduction. C. Chesnutt vii-xliv.Google Scholar
Swinton, David H. “Racial Inequality and Reparations.” The Wealth of Races: The Present Value of Benefits from Past Injustices. Ed. America, Richard F. New York: Greenwood, 2002. 153–62. Print.Google Scholar
Thomas, Brook. “The Legal Argument of Charles W. Chesnutt's Novels.” Law and Literature. Ed. Thomas, . Tübingen: Narr, 2002. 311–34. Print. Vol. 18 of REAL: Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature.Google Scholar
Waldrep, Christopher. The Many Faces of Judge Lynch: Extralegal Violence and Punishment in America. New York: Palgrave, 2002. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest. “The Gains and Losses of Corrective Justice.” Duke Law Journal 44.2 (1994): 277–97. Westlaw. Web. 20 Feb. 2011.Google Scholar
Wells, Ida B. “Lynch Law in America.” Department of Communication. Dept. of Communication, U of Washington, 6 Mar. 1998. Web. 23 Feb. 2011.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. Tort Law in America: An Intellectual History. New York: Oxford UP, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Wideman, John Edgar. “Charles W. Chesnutt: The Marrow of Tradition.” American Scholar 42.1 (1972-73): 128–34. Print.Google Scholar
Wigmore, John. “Responsibility for Tortious Acts: Its History.” Harvard Law Review 7.7 (1894): 383–405. HeinOnline. Web. 30 Mar. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolkomir, Michelle J. “Moral Elevation and Egalitarianism: Shades of Gray in Chesnutt's The Marrow of Tradition:' CLA Journal 36.3 (1993): 245–59. Print.Google Scholar
Wriggins, Jennifer. “Damages in Tort Litigation: Thoughts on Race and Remedies, 1865-2007.” Review of Litigation 27.1 (2007): 37–62. HeinOnline. Web. 12 June 2013.Google Scholar