Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-fxdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T04:48:07.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Father and the Bride in Shakespeare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Lynda E. Boose
Lynda E. Boose*
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although sixteenth-century daughters were evidently an economic burden on their fathers, Shakespeare consistently depicts fathers whose love for their daughters is so possessive that it endangers the family unit. To delineate the tensions of this bond at its liminal moment, Shakespeare evokes the altar tableau of the marriage service. This paradigmatic substructure illuminates the central conflict in the father-daughter relationship: the father who resists the ritual's demands to give his daughter to a rival male destroys both his paternal authority and his family's generative future; yet the daughter who escapes without undergoing ritual severance violates the family structure and thus becomes both guiltlessly agentive in ruining her original family and tragically incapable of creating a new one. The marriage ceremony is designed to resolve this paradox. In Shakespeare's dramas, submission to this rite ensures the only possibility of freedom for the individual and of continuity for the family.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 97 , Issue 3 , May 1982 , pp. 325 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Barber, C. L. Shakespeare's Festive Comedy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. Death and Sensuality: A Study of Eroticism and the Taboo. 1962; rpt. New York: Arno, 1977.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, David. Renaissance Quarterly 32(1979): 396–403.Google Scholar
The Book of Common Prayer, 1559. Ed. Booty, John E. Charlottesville: Univ. of Virginia Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Boose, Lynda E. “Othello's Handkerchief: ‘The Recognizance and Pledge of Love.‘” English Literary Renaissance 5(1975): 360–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownell, Thomas Church, ed. The Family Prayer Book; or, The Book of Common Prayer according to the Use of the Protestant Episcopal Church. New York: Stanford and Swords, 1853.Google Scholar
The Church and the Law of Nullity of Marriage. Report of a commission appointed by the archbishops of Canterbury and York in 1949. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1955.Google Scholar
Demos, John. New York Tifues Book Review, 25 Dec. 1977, 1.Google Scholar
Dundes, Alan. “‘To Love My Father All’: A Psychoanalytic Study of the Folktale Source of King Lear.” Southern Folklore Quarterly 40(1976): 353–66.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane. Trans. Trask, Willard R. New York: Harcourt, 1959.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore, ed. The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton, 1974.Google Scholar
Flandrin, Jean-Louis. Families in Former Times: Kinship, Household and Sexuality. Trans. Southern, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Frey, Charles. “‘O sacred, shadowy, cold, and constant queen’: Shakespeare's Imperiled and Chastening Daughters of Romance.” South Atlantic Bulletin 43(1978):125–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Geneva Bible. 1560; facsim. rpt. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Harding, D. W. “Father and Daughter in Shakespeare's Last Plays.” TLS, 30 Nov. 1979, 59–61.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. “Sex, Marriage and the Family in England.” Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 31(1978):450–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, Richard. Of the Lawes of Ecclesiasticall Politie. 1594; facsim. rpt. Amsterdam: Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, 1971.Google Scholar
Howard, George Elliott. A History of Matrimonial Institutions. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, Cyrus. “Fathers and Daughters in Shakespeare's Romances.” In Shakespeare's Romances Reconsidered. Ed. Kay, Carol McGinnis and Jacobs, Henry E. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1978, 77–90.Google Scholar
Kelly, Henry Ansgar. The Matrimonial Trials of Henry VIII. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter. The World We Have Lost. 2nd ed. 1965; rpt. London: Methuen, 1971.Google Scholar
LeClercq, R. V. “Crashaw's Epithalamium: Pattern and Vision.” Literary Monographs 6. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1975, 73–108.Google Scholar
Legg, J. Wickham. Ecclesiological Essays. London: De La More Press, 1905.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Trans. Bell, James Harle. Ed. Sturmer, John Richard von and Needham, Rodney. Paris, 1949; rpt. Boston: Beacon, 1969.Google Scholar
McCown, Gary M. “‘Runnawayes Eyes’ and Juliet's Epithalamion.” Shakespeare Quarterly 27(1976): 150–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, Richmond. Shakespeare's Use of the Bible and The Book of Common Prayer. London: Society for the Promotion of Biblical Knowledge, 1935.Google Scholar
Partridge, Eric. Shakespeare's Bawdy. 1948; rpt. New York: Dutton, 1969.Google Scholar
Rabkin, Norman. Shakespeare and the Problem of Meaning. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Ranald, Margaret Loftus. “‘As Marriage Binds, and Blood Breaks’: English Marriage and Shakespeare.” Shakespeare Quarterly 30(1979): 68–81.Google Scholar
The Rathen Manual. Ed. MacGregor, Duncan. Aberdeen: Aberdeen Ecclesiological Society, 1905.Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, S. William Shakespeare: A Compact Documentary Life. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Murray M., and Kahn, Coppélia, eds. Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic Essays. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1980.Google Scholar
The Statutes of the Realm. London: Record Commissions, 1820-28; facsim. ed. 1968.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. The Crisis of the Aristocracy: 1558–1660. Abridged ed. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. The Family, Sex and Marriage in England: 1500-1800. New York: Harper, 1977.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith. TLS, 21 Oct. 1977, 1226.Google Scholar
Tufte, Virginia. The Poetry of Marriage. Los Angeles: Tinnon-Brown, 1970.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.Google Scholar
Van Gennep, Arnold. The Rites of Passage. Trans. Vizedom, Monika B. and Caffee, Gabrielle L. 1908; rpt. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960.Google Scholar
Wheatly, Charles. A Rational Illustration of The Book of Common Prayer according to the Use of the Church of England. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1858.Google Scholar