Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:15:14.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in inflorescence architecture associated with yield components in a sorghum germplasm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2013

Khaing Pann Witt Hmon ,
Tariq Shehzad  and
Kazutoshi Okuno
Khaing Pann Witt Hmon
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba305-8572, Japan
Tariq Shehzad
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba305-8572, Japan Alliance for Research on North Africa (ARENA), University of Tsukuba, Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba305-8572, Japan
Kazutoshi Okuno*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba305-8572, Japan Alliance for Research on North Africa (ARENA), University of Tsukuba, Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba305-8572, Japan
*
* Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study was undertaken to analyse the variation in panicle-related traits of 206 sorghum accessions collected from 27 Asian and African countries. Significant differences among the accessions were observed for 18 measured traits. First, we found that the patterns of the observed panicle-related traits reflected the distribution of the accessions of different origins. Second, the distribution of several components of inflorescence architecture in sorghum accessions influenced their yield components. Principal component analysis of the data showed a wide range of variations across the 206 sorghum accessions. Despite their geographical isolation, no distinct separation between the Asian and African accessions was observed. Correlation coefficient and path coefficient analysis indicated that panicle length (PanL), the total number of branches, rachis length (Rac) and panicle width had a positive direct effect on grain yield. Finally, we showed that the variation in the inflorescence architecture of sorghum accessions was dependent not only on the PanL, but also on the total number of branches, the maximum length of primary branches, Rac, panicle diameter and panicle width. Thus, there are major panicle determinants that are strongly associated with grain yield which should be considered in breeding programmes. These results will serve as a starting point for further evaluation of sorghum germplasm via quantitative trait loci analysis and may be useful for improving yield based on careful consideration of trait selection and inflorescence morphology.

Keywords

associationinflorescence architecturepanicle traitsSorghum bicolor L. Moenchyield-related traits
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , December 2013 , pp. 258 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdi, A, Bekele, E, Asfaw, Z and Teshome, A (2002) Patterns of morphological variation of sorghum Sorghum bicolor L. Moench landraces in qualitative characters in North Shewa and South Welo, Ethiopia. Hereditas 137: 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayana, A and Bekele, E (1998) Geographical patterns of morphological variation in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) germplasm from Ethiopia and Eritrea: qualitative characters. Hereditas 129: 195–205.Google Scholar
Bala, RS, Biswas, PK and Ratnavathi, CV (1996) Advances in value addition of Kharif sorghum. Crop Improvement 23: 169–177.Google Scholar
Barnaud, A, Deu, M, Garine, E, Chantereau, J, Bolteq, J, Koïda, EO, McKey, D and Joly, HI (2008) Weed–crop complex in sorghum: the dynamics of genetic diversity in a traditional farming system. American Journal of Botany 96: 1869–1879.Google Scholar
Bello, D, Kadams, AM and Simon, SY (2001) Correlation and path coefficient analysis of grain yield and its components in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Nigerian Journal of Tropical Agriculture 3: 4–9.Google Scholar
Bommert, P, Satoh-Nagasawa, N, Jackson, D and Hirano, HY (2005) Genetics and evolution of inflorescence and flower development in grasses. Plant and Cell Physiology 46: 69–78.Google Scholar
Doust, AN and Kellogg, EA (2002) Inflorescence diversification in the panicoid “bristle grass” clade (Paniceae, Poaceae): evidence from molecular phylogenies and developmental morphology. American Journal of Botany 89: 1203–1222.Google Scholar
Doust, AN, Devos, MD, Gadberry, MD, Gale, MD and Kellogg, EA (2005) The genetic basis for inflorescences variation between foxtail and green millet (Poaceae). Genetics 169: 1659–1672.Google Scholar
FAO (1995) Sorghum. In: Lupien JR (ed.) Sorghum and Millets in Human Nutrition. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistics Division. http://www.fao.org/docrep/T0818E00/.Google Scholar
FAO (1999) Sorghum: Post Harvest Operation. In: Mejia D. Food Security Department (eds). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Futsuhara Y, Kondo S and Kitano H (1979a) Genetically studies on dense and lax panicles in rice. I. Character expression and mode of inheritance of lax panicle rice. Japanese Journal of Breeding 29: 151–158.Google Scholar
Futsuhara Y, Kondo S and Kitano H (1979b) Ditto. II. Character expression and mode of inheritance of dense panicle rice. Japanese Journal of Breeding 29: 239–247.Google Scholar
Harlan, JR and de Wet, JMJ (1972) A simplified classification of cultivated sorghum. Crop Science 12: 172–176.Google Scholar
House, LR (1985) A Guide to Sorghum Breeding. 2nd edn.Patancheru: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Ikeda, M, Hirose, Y, Takashi, T, Shibata, Y, Yamamura, T, Komura, T, Doi, K, Ashikari, M, Matsuoka, M and Kitano, H (2010) Analysis of rice panicle traits and detection of QTLs using an image analyzing method. Breeding Science 60: 55–64.Google Scholar
Kaitaniemi, P, Room, PM and Hanan, JS (1999) Architecture and morphogenesis of grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Field Crops Research 61: 51–60.Google Scholar
Kellogg, EA (2000) Molecular and morphological evolution in Andropogoneae. In: Everett, JE and Jacobs, SWL (eds) Grass: Systematics and Evolution. Melbourne: CSIRO, pp. 148–229.Google Scholar
Kock, N (2012) WarpPLS 3.0 User Manual. Laredo, TX: ScriptWarp Systems.Google Scholar
Maman, N, Mason, SC, Lyon, DJ and Dhungana, P (2004) Yield components of pearl millet and grain sorghum across environments in the central great plains. Crop Science 44: 2138–2148.Google Scholar
Murray, SC, Rooney, WL, Hamblin, MT, Mitchell, SE and Kresovich, S (2009) Sweet sorghum genetic diversity and association mapping for brix and height. The Plant Genome 2: 48–62.Google Scholar
Rai, KN, Murty, DS, Andrews, DJ and Bramel-Cox, PJ (1999) Genetic enhancement of pearl millet and sorghum for the semi-arid tropics of Asia and Africa. Genome 42: 617–628.Google Scholar
Saeed, M and Francis, CA (1983) Yield stability in relation to maturity in grain sorghum. Crop Science 23: 683–687.Google Scholar
Shehzad, T, Okuizumi, H, Kawase, M and Okuno, K (2009) Development of SSR-based sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) diversity research set of germplasm and its evaluation by morphological traits. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 809–827.Google Scholar
Singh, V, Oosterom, EJV, Jordan, DR, Hunt, CH and Hammer, GL (2001) Genetic variability and control of nodal root angle in sorghum. Crop Science 51: 2011–2020.Google Scholar
Taylor, JRN and Dewar, J (2001) Developments in sorghum food technologies. Advance in Food and Nutrition Research 43: 217–264.Google Scholar
Vermerris, W, Saballos, A, Ejeta, G, Mosier, NS, Ladisch, MR and Carpita, NC (2007) Molecular breeding to enhance ethanol production from corn and sorghum stover. Crop Science 47: 142–S153.Google Scholar
Vollbrecht, E, Patricia, SS, Lindee, G, Edward, S, Buckler, IV and Robert, M (2005) Architecture of floral branch systems in maize and related grasses. Nature 436: 1119–1126.Google Scholar
Yan, CJ, Zhou, JHS, Yan, FC and Yeboah, M (2007) Identification and characterization of a major QTL responsible for erect panicle trait in japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 115: 1093–1100.Google Scholar
Zhu, K, Tang, D, Yan, C, Chi, Z, Yu, H, Chen, J, Liang, I, Gu, M and Cheng, Z (2010) ERECT PANICLE2 encodes novel protein that regulates panicle erectness in Indica rice. Genetics 184: 343–350.Google Scholar
Zou, G, Yan, S, Zhai, G, Zhang, Z, Zou, J and Tao, Y (2011) Genetic variability and correlation of stalk yield-related traits and sugar concentration of stalk juice in a sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) population. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5: 1232–1238.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hmon Supplementary Material

Table S1-S4

Download Hmon Supplementary Material(File)
File 221.2 KB