Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:54:28.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A strategy for selecting diverse accessions using Principal Component Analysis from a large germplasm collection of soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2007

R. L Sapra  and
S. K. Lal
R. L Sapra*
Affiliation:
Pulse Research Lab, Genetics Division, Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India
S. K. Lal
Affiliation:
Pulse Research Lab, Genetics Division, Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We suggest a diversity-dependent strategy, based on Principle Component Analysis, for selecting distinct accessions/parents for breeding from a soybean germplasm collection comprising of 463 lines, characterized and evaluated for 10 qualitative and eight quantitative traits. A sample size of six accessions included all the three states, namely low, medium and high of the individual quantitative traits, while a sample of 16–19 accessions included all the 60–64 distinct states of qualitative as well as quantitative traits. Under certain assumptions, the paper also develops an expression for estimating the size of a target population for capturing maximum variability in a sample three accessions.

Keywords

breedingdiversitygermplasmPrincipal Component Analysissamplingsoybeaninertia
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 1 , Issue 2-3 , August 2003 , pp. 151 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhatt, GM (1973) Comparison of various methods of selecting parents for hybridization aimed at yield improvement in self-pollinated crops. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research 24, 457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisht, IS, Mahajan, RK, Loknathan, TR, Gautam, PL, Mathur, PN and Hodgkin, T (1999) Assessment of genetic diversity, stratifi- cation of germplasm accessions in diversity groups and sampling strategies for establishing a core collection of Indian sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 119, 35–46.Google Scholar
Brown, AHD (1989) Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31, 818–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, TS and Worall, WD (1987) Electrophoretic variation among and within strains of ‘kharkof’ Wheat maintained at 11 locations. Euphytica 36, 815–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federer, TW (1956) Augmented (or Hoonuiaku) designs. The Hawaiian Planter's Record IV: 191–202.Google Scholar
Grafius, JE (1965) A Geometry of Plant Breeding. Michigan State University Research Bulletin. East Lansing: Michigan State University, 59 pp.Google Scholar
Hamon, S and Noirot, M (1996) Some proposed procedure for obtaining a core collection using quantitative plant characterization data. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Okra, NBPGR, New Delhi, India, October, pp. 8–12.Google Scholar
Lal, SK and Rana, VKS (2000) Genetic enhancement of soybean. Indian Journal of Genetics 60, 483–494.Google Scholar
Mahajan, RK, Bisht, IS, Agrawal, RC and Rana, RS (1996) Studies on a South Asian okra collection: methodology for establishing a representative core set using characterization data. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noirot, M, Hamon, S and Anthony, F (1996)The principal component scoring: a new method of constituting a core collection using quantitative data. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapra, RL, Narain, P and Chauhan, SVS (1998) A general model for sample size determination for collecting germplasm. Journal of Bioscience 23, 647–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapra, RL, Narain, P, Chauhan, SVS, Lal, SK and Singh, BB (2003) Sample size for collecting germplasms-a polyploid model with mixed mating system. Journal of Bioscience 28, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoen, DJ and Brown, AHD (1995) maximizing genetic diversity in core collections of wild relatives of crop species. In: Hodgkin, T, Brown, AHD, van Hintum, ThJL and Morales, EAV (eds) Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources. Chichester: John Wiley, pp. 55–76.Google Scholar
Thurling, N and Ratinam, M (1987) Evaluation of parents selection methods for yield improvement of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Euphytica 36, 913–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umesh, S, Sapra, RL, Chauhan, SVS and Narain, P (1999) Studies in world tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) germplasm collection: methodology for establishing a representative core set using characterization data. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 12, 290–301.Google Scholar