Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:17:49.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiplex PCR effectively identifies tetraploid Triticum AABB – or AAGG-genome species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2017

Ken-Ichi Tanno ,
Ayaka Takeuchi ,
Eri Akahori ,
Keiko Kobayashi ,
Taihachi Kawahara  and
Kyoko Yamane
Ken-Ichi Tanno
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yoshida 1677-1, Yamaguchi City, Yamaguchi 753-8515, Japan
Ayaka Takeuchi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
Eri Akahori
Affiliation:
Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
Keiko Kobayashi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
Taihachi Kawahara
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Nakajo, Mozume, Muko City, Kyoto 617-0001, Japan
Kyoko Yamane*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We developed a multiplex PCR DNA marker for quick and easy identification of the AAGG-genome timopheevii lineage, including Triticum timopheevii, Triticum araraticum and hexaploid Triticum zhukovskyi (AAAmAmGG), and the AABB-genome emmer wheat lineage, including Triticum durum, Triticum dicoccum and Triticum dicoccoides. Distinguishing between tetraploid AAGG- and AABB-genome wheat species based on morphology is known to be difficult. This multiplex PCR system is based on the simultaneous PCR amplification of two chloroplast regions, matK and rbcL. The matK region molecularly distinguishes the two lineages, whereas the rbcL region is a positive control amplicon. We also examined whether the simple sequence repeat is a fixed mutation within species, using genetic resources in the collection of KOMUGI, Kyoto University, which comprises accessioned species collected across diverse geographical areas. The multiplex PCR marker distinguished AAGG from AABB species with complete accuracy.

Keywords

emmergenotypingmatKrbcLtimopheeviiTriticum
Type
Short Communication
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , June 2018 , pp. 279 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boscato, P, Carioni, C, Brandolini, A, Sadori, L and Rottoli, M (2008) Molecular markers for the discrimination of Triticum turgidum L. subsp. dicoccum (Schrank ex Schübl.) Thell. and Triticum timopheevii (Zhuk.) Zhuk. subsp. timopheevii. Journal of Archaeological Science 35: 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottema, CD and Sommer, SS (1993) PCR amplification of specific alleles: rapid detection of known mutations and polymorphisms. Mutation Research 288: 93–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubey, B, Meganathan, PR and Haque, I (2009) Multiplex PCR assay for rapid identification of three endangered snake species of India. Conservation Genetics 10: 1861–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escaravage, N, Questiau, A, Pornon, D, Boche, B and Taberlet, P (1998) Clonal diversity in a Rhododendron ferrugineum L. (Ericaceae) population inferred from AFLP markers. Molecular Ecology 7: 975–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasparyan, B and Arimura, M (2014) Studies of the Stone Age in the Republic of Armenia: achievements and perspectives. In: Gasparyan, B and Arimura, M (ed.) Stone Age of Armenia: A Guide-Book to the Stone Age Archaeology in the Republic of Armenia. Japan: Kanazawa University Press, pp. 13–33.Google Scholar
Golovnina, KA, Glushkov, SA, Blinov, AG, Mayorov, VI, Adkison, LR and Goncharov, NP (2007) Molecular phylogeny of the genus Triticum L. Plant Systematics and Evolution 264: 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, XH, Zhou, XP, Lin, QX, Peng, ZN, Fang, WZ and Chen, XL (2012) A novel multiplex PCR assay for species identification in the Chinese Egret (Egretta eulophotes) and Little Egret (E. garzetta). Conservation Genetics Resources 4: 31–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G, Valamoti, S and Charles, M (2000) Early crop diversity: a ‘‘new’’ glume wheat from northern Greece. Vegetation History and Archaeobotony 9: 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, T (1997) Catalogue of Aegilops-Triticum Germ-Plasm Preserved in Kyoto University 2. Kyoto, Japan: Laboratory of Crop Evolution, Kyoto University.Google Scholar
Kawahara, T (1998) Catalogue of Aegilops-Triticum Germ-Plasm Preserved in Kyoto University 2, supplement. Kyoto, Japan: Laboratory of Crop Evolution, Kyoto University.Google Scholar
Kohler-Schneider, M (2003) Contents of a storage pit from late Bronze Age Stillfried, Austria: another record of the ‘‘new’’ glume wheat. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 12: 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilienfeld, FA and Kihara, H (1934) Genome analyse bei Triticum und Aegilops. V. Triticum timopheevii Zhuk. Cytologia 6: 87–122.Google Scholar
Love, RM (1941) Chromosome behavior in F 1 wheat hybrids. I. Pentaploids. Canadian Journal of Research 19: 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, W, Zhang, W and Gale, KR (2003) Multiplex-PCR typing of high molecular weight glutenin alleles in wheat. Euphytica 134: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendonca, FF, Hashimoto, DT, De-Franco, B, Porto-Foresti, F, Gadig, OBF, Oliveira, C and Foresti, F (2010) Genetic identification of lamniform and carcharhiniform sharks using multiplex-PCR. Conservation Genetics Resources 2: 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merdinoglu, D, Butterlin, G, Bevilacqua, L, Chiquet, V, Adam-Blondon, AF and Decroocq, S (2005) Development and characterization of a large set of microsatellite markers in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) suitable for multiplex PCR. Molecular Breeding 15: 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migliaro, D, Morreale, G, Gardiman, M, Landolfo, S and Crespan, M (2013) Direct multiplex PCR for grapevine genotyping and varietal identification. Plant Genetic Resources 11: 182–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, L (1953) Chromosome behaviour in species hybrids with Triticum timopheevi. Heredity 7: 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanno, K-I, Kawahara, T and Takata, K (2015) Archaeobotanical studies at and around Qalat Said Ahmadan (Appendix 3: excavation of Qalat Said Ahmadan, Slemani, Iraq-Kurdistan). Al-Rafidan 36: 59–63.Google Scholar
Thompson, JD, Higgins, DG and Gibson, TJ (1994) ClustalW—improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673–4680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toulemonde, F, Durand, F, Berrio, L, Bonnaire, E, Daoulas, G and Wiethold, J (2015) Records of ‘‘new’’ glume wheat in France: a review. Vegetation History Archaeobotany 24: 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagenaar, EB (1966) Studies on the genome constitution of Triticum timopheevi ZHUK. II. TheT. timopheevi complex and its origin. Evolution 20: 150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohary, D and Hopf, M (2000) Domestication of Plants in the Old World. NY: Oxford Press, p. 45.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Tanno supplementary material

Tanno supplementary material 1

Download Tanno supplementary material(File)
File 34.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Tanno supplementary material

Tanno supplementary material 2

Download Tanno supplementary material(File)
File 26.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Tanno supplementary material

Tanno supplementary material 3

Download Tanno supplementary material(File)
File 14.9 KB