Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:07:20.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Managing self-pollinated germplasm collections to maximize utilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

Randall L. Nelson*
Affiliation:
USDA – Agricultural Research Service, Soybean/Maize Germplasm, Pathology, and Genetics Research Unit, Department of Crop Sciences, 1101 W. Peabody Dr, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The primary mission of germplasm collections is to preserve genetic diversity, but germplasm is preserved so that it can be used. Historically, the standard practice is that all germplasm accessions should be maintained as collected, so that even self-pollinated accessions are maintained as heterogeneous seed lots. In theory, this seems like an ideal strategy for preserving genetic diversity, but in practice, it is simply not workable. Heterogeneous accessions are in constant risk of change and loss. It is possible to mitigate the risk factors, but they can only be lessened and not eliminated. Maintaining pure-lined accessions for self-pollinated species not only eliminates the problems associated with genetic drift and natural selection, but also enhances the accuracy of the evaluations and fosters effective germplasm utilization. Neither the current potential to characterize entire germplasm collections with tens of thousands of DNA markers nor the future potential of whole genome sequencing to completely characterize the diversity of all accessions in collections can be fully realized for self-pollinated species unless accessions are homogeneous and homozygous. In this manuscript, the case is made for pure-lining self-pollinated germplasm accessions using the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection, which has maintained pure-lined accessions for over 50 years, as an example. There is also an analysis of the extensive seed distribution from this collection to indicate the value of a diverse collection of genotypes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahrent, DK and Caviness, CE (1994) Natural cross-pollination of twelve soybean cultivars in Arkansas. Crop Science 34: 376378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, RL (1971) Two major genes for time of flowering and maturity in soybeans. Crop Science 11: 242242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, RL, Juvik, GA and Nelson, RL (1987) USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection Inventory. Vol. 1. International Agricultural Publications. INTSOY Series number 30.Google Scholar
Bernard, RL, Cremeens, CR, Cooper, RL, Collins, FI, Krober, OA, Athow, KL, Laviolette, FA, Coble, CJ and Nelson, RL (1998) Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Groups 000 to IV (FC 01.547 to PI 266.807). U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin no. 1844.Google Scholar
Carter, TE, Nelson, RL, Sneller, CH and Cui, Z (2004) Genetic Diversity in Soybean. In: Boerma, HR and Specht, JE (eds) Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses, vol. Agronomy. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, pp. 303416.Google Scholar
Chen, Y and Nelson, RL (2004a) Evaluation and classification of leaflet shape and size in wild soybean. Crop Science 44: 671677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y and Nelson, RL (2004b) Genetic variation and relationships among cultivated, wild, and semi-wild soybean. Crop Science 44: 316325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Yiwu and Nelson, RL (2006) Variation in early plant height in wild soybean. Crop Science 46: 865869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coble, CJ, Sprau, GL, Nelson, RL, Orf, JL, Thomas, DI and Cavins, JF (1991) Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Groups 000 to IV (PI 490.765 to PI 507.573). USDA Technical Bulletin no. 1802.Google Scholar
Committee on Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops (1972) Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Committee on Germplasm Resources (1978) Conservation of Germplasm Resources, An Imperative. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Dong, YS, Zhuang, BC, Zhao, LM, Sun, H and He, MY (2001) The genetic diversity of annual wild soybeans grown in China. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 98103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsett, PH (1927) Soybeans in Manchuria. Proceedings of American Soybean Association 1: 173176. Publ. 1928.Google Scholar
Farias Neto, AL, Hasmi, R, Schmidt, M, Carlson, SR, Hartman, GL, Li, S, Nelson, RL and Diers, BW (2007) Mapping and confirmation of a new sudden death syndrome resistance QTL on linkage group D2 from the soybean genotypes PI 567374 and “Ripley”. Molecular Breeding 20: 5362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farias Neto, AL, Schmidt, M, Hartman, GL, Li, S and Diers, BW (2008) Inoculation methods under greenhouse conditions for evaluating soybean resistance to sudden death syndrome. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 43: 14751482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, R, Ohara, M, Okazaki, O and Shimamoto, Y (1997) The extent of natural cross-pollination in wild soybean (Glycine soja). Journal of Heredity 88: 124128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gizlice, Z, Carter, TE Jr and Burton, JW (1994) Genetic base for North American public soybean cultivars released between 1947 and 1988. Crop Science 34: 11431151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, JL, Peregrine, EK, Sprau, GL, Cremeens, CR, Nelson, RL, Kenty, MM, Kilen, TC and Thomas, DA (2001) Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Groups VI (VIII (FC 03.659 to PI 567.235B). U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin no. 1894, p. 147.Google Scholar
Hill, JL, Peregrine, EK, Sprau, GL, Cremeens, CR, Nelson, RL, Orf, JH and Thomas, DA (2005) Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Groups 000–IV (PI 507670–PI 574486). U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin no. 1914, p. 131.Google Scholar
Hill, JL, Peregrine, EK, Sprau, GL, Cremeens, CR, Nelson, RL, Orf, and Thomas, DA (2008) Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Groups 000–IV (PI 578371–PI 612761). U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin no. 1919, p. 151.Google Scholar
Hymowitz, T and Harlan, JR (1983) The introduction of the soybean to North Amercia by Samuel Bowen in 1765. Econ. Bot 37: 371379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyten, David L, Qijian, Song, Youlin, Zhu, Ik-Young, Choi, Nelson, Randall L, Costa Jose, M, Specht, James E, Shoemaker, Randy C and Cregan, Perry B (2006) Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity. PNAS 103: 1666616671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iqbal, MJ, Meksem, K, Njiti, VN, Kassem, MA and Lightfoot, DA (2001) Microsatellite markers identify three additional quantitative trait loci for resistance to soybean sudden-death syndrome (SDS) in Essex x Forrest RILs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102: 187192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keim, Paul, Diers, Brian W, Olson, Terry C and Shoemaker, Randy C (1990) RFLP mapping in soybean: association between marker loci and variation in quantitative traits. Genetics 126: 735742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiang, YT, Chiang, YC and Kaizuma, N (1992) Genetic diversity in natural populations of wild soybean in Iwate Prefecture, Japan. Journal of Heredity 83: 325329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, JD, Yu, JK, Hwang, YH, Blake, S, So, YS, Lee, GJ, Nguyen, HT and Shannon, JG (2008) Genetic diversity of wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. and Zucc.) accessions from South Korea and other countries. Crop Science 48: 606616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z and Nelson, RL (2002) RAPD marker diversity among soybean and wild soybean accessions from four Chinese provinces. Crop Science 42: 17371744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, YH, Li, W, Zhang, C, Yang, L, Chang, RZ, Gaut, BS and Qiu, LJ (2010) Genetic diversity in domesticated soybean (Glycine max) and its wild progenitor (Glycine soja) for SSR and SNP loci. New Phytologist 188: 242253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meksem, K, Doubler, K, Chancharoenchai, K, Njiti, VN, Chang, SJC, Rao Arelli, AP, Cregan, PB, Gray, LE, Gibson, PT and Lightfoot, DA (1999) Clustering among loci underlying soybean resistance to Fusarium solani, SDS and SCN in near-isogenic lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 11311142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, I and Saito, S (1923) Linked factors in soybeans. Japan Journal of Botany 1: 121136.Google Scholar
Nelson, RL, Amdor, PJ, Orf, JH and Cavins, JF (1988) Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Groups 000 to IV (PI 427.136 to PI 445.845). USDA Technical Bulletin no. 1726.Google Scholar
Nelson, RL, Amdor, PJ, Orf, JH, Lambert, JW, Cavins, JF, Kleiman, R, Laviolette, FA and Athow, KA (1987) Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Groups 000 to IV (PI 273.483 to PI 427.107). USDA Technical Bulletin no. 1718. p. 267.Google Scholar
Njiti, VN, Johnson, JE, Torto, TA, Gray, LE and Lightfoot, DA (2001) Inoculum rates influences selection for field resistance to soybean sudden death syndrome in the greenhouse. Crop Science 41: 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njiti, VN, Meksem, K, Iqbal, MJ, Johnson, JE, Kassem, MA, Zobrist, KF, Kilo, VY and Lightfoot, DA (2002) Common loci underlie field resistance to soybean sudden death syndrome in Forrest, Pyramid, Essex, and Douglas. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 294300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohara, M and Shimamoto, Y (1994) Some ecological and demographic characteristics of two growth forms of wild soybean (Glycine soja). Canadian Journal of Botany 72: 486492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohara, M, Shimamoto, Y and Sanbuichi, T (1989) Distribution and ecological features of wild soybeans (Glycine soja) in Hokkaido. Journal of the faculty of Agriculture – Hokkaido University 64: 4350.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Marcelo F, Randall L, Nelson, Isaias O, Geraldi, Cosme D, Cruz and José Francisco F, de Toledo (2010) Establishing a soybean germplasm core collection. Field Crops Res 119: 277289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, RG, Pfeiffer, TW, Buss, GR and Kilen, TC (2004) Soybeans: improvement, production, and uses. In: Boerma, HR and Specht, JE (eds), vol. Agronomy. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, pp. 137233.Google Scholar
Peregrine, EK, Sprau, GL, Cremeens, CR, Handly, P, Kilen, TC, Smith, JR, Thomas, DA, Sarins, JD and Nelson, RL (2008) Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Group V (FC 30265–PI 612614). and Maturity Groups VI–VIII (PI 416758–PI 606432B). U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin no. 1920, p. 369.Google Scholar
Piper, CV and Morse, WJ (1910) The soybean: History, varieties, and field studies. USDA Bureau of Plant Industry Bulletin 197.Google Scholar
Piper, CV and Morse, WJ (1923) The Soybean. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Piper, CV and Morse, WJ (1925) How we got our soybeans. Proceedings of American Soybean Association 1: 58 Publ. 1928.Google Scholar
Qiu, Li-Juan, Peng-Yin, Chen, Zhang-Xiong, Liu, Ying-Hui, Li, Rong-Xia, Guan, Li-Hui, Wang and Ru-Zhen, Chang (2011) The worldwide utilization of the Chinese soybean germplasm collection. Plant Genetic Resources 9: 109122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherm, H and Yang, XB (1996) Development of sudden death syndrome of soybean in relation to soil temperature and soil water potential. Phytopathology 86: 642649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmutz, J, et al. (2010) Genome sequence of the paleopolyploid soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Nature 463: 178183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, GF (1971) Genetic vulnerability in corn and sorghum. Proceedings of Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference 26: 96104.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Botany (1898) Inventory no. 1. Foreign seeds and plants imported by the Section of Seed and Plant Introduction, nos. 1-1000 (Available at http://ddr.nal.usda.gov/handle/10113/37063).Google Scholar
Wen, ZX, Ding, YL, Zhao, TJ and Gai, JY (2009) Genetic diversity and peculiarity of annual wild soybean (G. soja Sieb. et Zucc.) from various eco-regions in China. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 119: 371381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, W, Zhou, T, Zhong, M and Lu, B (2007) Sampling strategy for wild soybean (Glycine soja) populations based on their genetic diversity and fine-scale spatial genetic structure. Frontiers of Biology in China 2: 397402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar