Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:00:08.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interspecific jatropha hybrid as a new promising source of woody biomass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2014

Narathid Muakrong ,
Khin Thida One ,
Patcharin Tanya  and
Peerasak Srinives
Narathid Muakrong
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Program, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand
Khin Thida One
Affiliation:
Tropical Agriculture Program, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand
Patcharin Tanya
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand
Peerasak Srinives*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand
*
* Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An interspecific hybrid Jatropha curcas (Jc) × Jatropha integerrima (Ji) was developed between jatropha (Jc) from Mexico and Ji from Thailand. Jc is a large canopy plant with soft wood, while Ji is a tall plant with semi-hard wood. The F1 hybrid and their parents were grown under field conditions at a spacing of 1 m × 1.5 m. One-year-old plants were harvested and determined for biomass yield, calorific value and chemical composition of wood, as well as for heterosis (hybrid vigour) of these characters. The F1 plants gave an average fresh wood weight of 18.07 kg/plant, a moisture content of 46.56%, a dry wood weight of 9.56 kg/plant and a wood density of 0.62 g/cm3. The F1 hybrid had less ash (2.60%) than Jc (6.93%), but a higher heat value of wood (18.73 MJ/kg) than Jc (17.77 MJ/kg). Heterosis over mid-parent was very high and positive in dry wood weight, fresh wood weight and number of secondary branches at 542, 310 and 450%, respectively, while negative heterosis was found in moisture content ( − 24.86%). The desirable traits found in the F1 hybrid can be fixed by cutting propagation of the selected plants.

Keywords

coppiceheterosisinterspecific hybridjatrophawoody biomass
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 12 , Issue S1: Special issue on the 3rd International Symposium on “Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources” , July 2014 , pp. S17 - S20
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC(1990) AOAC method 942.05 – ash in animal feeds. In: Helrick, K (ed.) Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. vol. 70. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC.Google Scholar
Brewbaker, JL and Sorensson, CT (1990) New tree crops from interspecific Leucaena hybrids. In: Janick, J and Simon, JE (eds) Advances in New Crops. Portland: Timber Press, pp. 283–289.Google Scholar
Christine, LR, Tentchev, D, Prin, Y, Goh, D, Japarudin, Y and Perrineau, MM (2009) Bradyrhizobia nodulating the Acacia mangium× A. auriculiformis interspecific hybrid are specific and differ from those associated with both parental species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75: 752–759.Google Scholar
Everson, CS, Mengistu, MG and Gush, MB (2012) A field assessment of the agronomic performance and water use of Jatropha curcas in South Africa. Biomass and Bioenergy. Available at ( http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953412001432 ).Google Scholar
Feria, MJ, López, F, García, JC, Pérez, A, Zamudio, MAM and Alfaro, A (2011) Valorization of Leucaena leucocephala for energy and chemicals from autohydrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 3: 2224–2233.Google Scholar
Johansson, LKH and Alström, S (2000) Field resistance to willow leaf rust Melampsora epitea in inter- and intraspecific hybrids of Salix viminalis and S. dasyclados . European Journal of Plant Pathology 106: 763–769.Google Scholar
Klasnja, B, Kopitovic, S and Orlovic, S (2002) Wood and bark of some poplar and willow clones as fuelwood. Biomass Bioenergy 23: 427–432.Google Scholar
Lakshminarayana, M and Sujatha, M (2001) Screening of Jatropha species against the major defoliators of castor (Ricinus communis L.). Journal of Oilseeds Research 18: 228–230.Google Scholar
López, F, García, MM, Yánez, R, Tapias, R, Fernández, M and Díaz, MJ (2008) Leucaena species valoration for biomass and paper production in 1 and 2 year harvest. Bioresource Technology 99: 4846–4853.Google Scholar
Peter, M (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresource Technology 83: 37–46.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team(2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0; URL: http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Silip, JJ, Armansyah, HT, Hambali, H, Surahman, M and Sutrisno, (2010) Lifecycle duration and maturity heterogeneity of Jatropha curcas Linn. Journal of Sustainable Development 3: 291–295.Google Scholar
Soehendi, R and Srinives, P (2005) Significance of heterosis and heterobeltiosis in F1 hybrid of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) for hybrid seed production. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 37: 97–105.Google Scholar
Sotolongo, JA, Beatón, P, Diaz, A, de Oca, SM, del Valle, Y, Pavón, SG and Zanzi, R (2009) Jatropha curcas L. as a source for the production of biodiesel: a Cuban Experience. 15th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition. Berlin, Germany, pp. 2631–2633. Google Scholar
Tar, MM, Tanya, P and Srinives, P (2011) Heterosis of agronomic characters in jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.). Kasetsart Journal 45: 583–593.Google Scholar
Telmo, C, Lousada, J and Moreira, N (2010) Proximate analysis, backwards stepwise regression between gross calorific value, ultimate and chemical analysis of wood. Bioresource Technology 101: 3808–3815.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Vries, SMG and Turok, J (2001) Technical Bulletin: In situ Conservation of Populus nigra . Rome: International Plant Genetic Resource Institute (IPGRI).Google Scholar