Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:24:00.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genotypic variation in adaptation to soil acidity in local upland rice varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2014

Suwannee Laenoi ,
Nattinee Phattarakul ,
Sansanee Jamjod ,
Narit Yimyam ,
Bernard Dell  and
Benjavan Rerkasem
Suwannee Laenoi
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science and Natural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
Nattinee Phattarakul
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science and Natural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
Sansanee Jamjod
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science and Natural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand Lanna Rice Research Centre, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
Narit Yimyam
Affiliation:
Highland Research and Training Centre, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
Bernard Dell
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Australia
Benjavan Rerkasem*
Affiliation:
Plant Genetic Resource and Nutrition Laboratory, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
*
* Corresponding authors:Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Local upland rice germplasm is an invaluable resource for farmers who grow rice on acidic soils without flooding that benefits wetland rice. In this study, we evaluated the adaptation to soil acidity in common local upland rice varieties from an area with acidic soil in Thailand. Tolerance to hydrogen and aluminium (Al) toxicity was determined by measuring root growth, plant dry weight and phosphorus (P) uptake in aerated solution culture without the supplementation of Al (0 mg/l) at pH 7 and 4 and with the supplementation of 10, 20 and 30 mg Al/l at pH 4. The root growth of upland rice plants grown from farmers' seed was depressed less by Al than that of common wetland rice varieties. Pure-line genotypes of upland rice varieties were differentiated into several classes of Al tolerance, with frequency distribution of the classes that sometimes differed between the accessions of the same varieties. The effect of Al tolerance on root length was closely correlated with depression by Al in root dry weight and whole-plant P content. A source for adaptation to soil acidity for exploitation in the genetic improvement of aerobic and rainfed rice is clearly found among local upland rice varieties grown on acidic soils. However, the variation in tolerance to soil acidity within and among the seed lots of the same varieties maintained by individual farmers as well as among the varieties needs to be taken into consideration.

Keywords

acid soiladaptationaerobic riceAl toleranceupland rice
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , November 2015 , pp. 206 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, AHD (1978) Isozymes, plant population genetics structure and genetic conservation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 52: 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, K (2008) Biological evolution within complex social systems: a study of rice diversity in northern Thailand. PhD Dissertation, Columbia University. Google Scholar
Fageria, NK and Breseghello, F (2004) Nutritional diagnostic in upland rice production in some municipalities of state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Journal of Plant Nutrition 27: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fageria, NK and Carvalho, JRP (1982) Influence of aluminum in nutrient solutions on chemical-composition in upland rice cultivars. Plant and Soil 69: 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Famoso, AN, Clark, RT, Shaff, JE, Craft, E, McCouch, SR and Kochian, LV (2010) Development of a novel aluminum tolerance phenotyping platform used for comparisons of cereal aluminum tolerance and investigations into rice aluminum tolerance mechanisms. Plant Physiology 153: 1678–1691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, T, Magbanua, R, Roder, W, Van Keer, K, Trébuil, G and Reom, V (2001) Upland rice response to phosphorus fertilization in Asia. Agronomy Journal 93: 1362–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRiSP (Global Rice Science Partnership)(2013) Rice Almanac, 4th edn. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Harlan, J (1992) Crop and Man, 2nd edn. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IRRI(1980) Descriptors for Rice, Oryza Sativa L. Standard Evaluation System for Rice. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Kato, Y and Katsura, K (2014) Rice adaptation to aerobic soils: physiological considerations and implications for agronomy. Plant Production Science 17: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, PS and Proctor, J (2001) Why plants grow poorly on very acid soils: are ecologists missing the obvious? Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 791–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinraide, TB (1991) Identity of the rhizotoxic aluminium species. Plant and Soil 134: 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambers, H, Chapins, FS and Pons, TL (1998) Plant Physiological Ecology. New York: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazof, DB and Holland, MJ (1999) Evaluation of the aluminium- induced root growth inhibition in isolation from low pH effects in Glycine max, Pisum sativum and Phaseolus vulgaris . Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 26: 147–157.Google Scholar
Ma, JF, Shen, RF, Zhao, ZQ, Wissuwa, M, Takeuchi, Y, Ebitani, T and Yano, M (2002) Response of rice to Al stress and identification of quantitative trait loci for Al tolerance. Plant and Cell Physiology 43: 652–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCouch, S (2004) Diversifying selection in plant breeding. PloS Biology 2: 1507–1512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, J and Riley, JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27: 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, VT, Burow, MD, Nguyen, HT, Le, BT, Le, TD and Paterson, AH (2001) Molecular mapping of genes conferring aluminum tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102: 1002–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OAE, (2013) Agricultural Statistics of Thailand 2012. Office of Agricultural Economics, Ministry of Agriculture, Bangkok. ISSN 0857-6610. Google Scholar
Phattarakul, N (2008) Genotypic variation in tolerance to acid soil an local upland rice varieties. PhD Thesis (Agronomy), Graduate School, Chiang Mai University. Google Scholar
Pintasen, S, Prom-u-thai, C, Jamjod, S, Yimyam, N and Rerkasem, B (2007) Variation of grain iron content in a local upland rice germplasm from the village of Huai Tee Cha in northern Thailand. Euphytica 158: 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponnamperuma, FN (1972) The chemistry of submerged soils. Advances in Agronomy 24: 29–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, LE and McSorley, R (2000) Ecological Principles of Agriculture. Albany, New York: Delmar Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Pusadee, T, Jamjod, S, Chiang, Y, Rerkasem, B and Schaal, BA (2009) Genetic structure and isolation by distance in a landrace of Thai rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 13880–13885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahrawat, KL (2005) Fertility and organic matter in submerged rice soils. Current Science India 88: 735–739.Google Scholar
Sirabanchongkran, A, Rerkasem, K, Yimyam, N, Boonma, W, Coffey, K, Pinedo-Vasquez, M and Padoch, C (2004) Varietal turnover and seed exchange: implications for conservation of rice genetic diversity on-farm. International Rice Research Notes 29: 18–20.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G and Cochran, WG (1968) Statistical Methods. 6th edn. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, M, Dawson, JC, Goldringer, I and Bonneuil, C (2011) Seed exchanges, a key to analyze crop diversity dynamics in farmer-led on-farm conservation. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 58: 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M, Demeulenaere, E, Dawson, JC, Khan, AR, Galic, N, Jouanne-Pin, S, Remoue, C, Bonneuil, C and Goldringer, I (2012) On-farm dynamic management of genetic diversity: the impact of seed diffusions and seed saving practices on a population-variety of bread wheat. Evolutionary Applications 5: 779–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unthong, A (2006) Evaluating Local Thai Knowledge: A Case Study of Local Rice Varieties. A report to the National Research Council of Thailand, Social Science Research Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar
Wiengweera, A, Greenway, H and Thomson, CJ (1997) The use of agar nutrient solution to simulate lack of convection in waterlogged soils. Annals of Botany 80: 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, P, Liao, CY, Hu, B, Yi, KK, Jin, WZ, Ni, J and He, C (2000) QTLs and epistasis for aluminum tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) at different seedling stages. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100: 1295–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, Y, Wan, J, Jiang, L, Wang, C, Liu, L, Zhang, YM and Zhai, H (2006) Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with aluminum tolerance in rice. Euphytica 150: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yimyam, N, Rerkasem, K and Rerkasem, B (2003) Fallow enrichment with pada (Macaranga denticulata (Bl.) Muell. Arg.) trees in rotational shifting cultivation in Northern Thailand. Agroforestry Systems 57: 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, S, Forno, DA, Cock, JH and Gomez, KA (1976) Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice, 3rd edn. Los Banos, Philippines: The International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Zeigler, RS and Puckridge, DW (1995) Improving sustainable productivity in rice-based rainfed lowland systems of South and South-East Asia. GeoJournal 35: 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar