Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:48:18.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic diversity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) germplasm as revealed by SSR markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2015

B. Usha Kiran ,
N. Mukta ,
P. Kadirvel ,
K. Alivelu ,
S. Senthilvel ,
P. Kishore  and
K. S. Varaprasad
B. Usha Kiran
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad500 030, India
N. Mukta
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad500 030, India
P. Kadirvel*
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad500 030, India
K. Alivelu
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad500 030, India
S. Senthilvel
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad500 030, India
P. Kishore
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad500 030, India
K. S. Varaprasad
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad500 030, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Safflower is a multi-purpose oilseed crop, primarily known for good quality oil containing highest polyunsaturated fatty acid content (>80%) among edible oils. In this study, a core subset of 148 safflower accessions representing 15 countries, predominantly of Indian origin, was evaluated for agronomic traits and characterized for genetic diversity, population structure and linkage disequilibrium (LD) using 44 simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci across 11 linkage groups to enable its utilization in breeding and genetic mapping purposes. The collection had substantial variation for seed yield-related traits. SSR allelic variation was low as indicated by average number of alleles (3.6) per locus, gene diversity (0.314) and polymorphism information content (0.284). Cluster analysis (neighbour-joining tree) revealed five major genotypic groups with very low bootstrap support. STRUCTURE analysis showed recognizable population structure; based on membership coefficients ( ≥ 0.75), 52% accessions were classified into four populations (K= 4) and the remaining 48% accessions into admixture group. High Fst values (0.30–0.48) suggested that the populations were substantially differentiated. Analysis of molecular variance results showed that maximum of genetic variation (85%) was explained between individuals within the population suggesting that the population structure was only weak. About 1.9% of SSR locus pairs were in LD, which appeared to be low. High phenotypic variation, mild population structure and low level of LD among unlinked loci suggested that the core subset can be explored for association mapping of seed yield components in safflower.

Keywords

genetic relationshipsmicrosatellite markersplant genetic resourcespopulation differentiationquantitative trait variation
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdurakhmonov, IY and Abdukarimov, A (2008) Application of association mapping to understanding the genetic diversity of plant germplasm resources. International Journal of Plant Genomics 2008: 574927. doi:10.1155/2008/574927.Google Scholar
Alivelu, K and Mukta, N (2012) Development of safflower germplasm core collection based on quantitative descriptors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, 14–15 September 2012, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
Amini, F, Saeidi, G and Arzani, A (2008) Study of genetic diversity in safflower genotypes using agro-morphological traits and RAPD markers. Euphytica 163: 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashri, A (1975) Evaluation of the germplasm collection of safflower, Carthamus tinctorius L.V. Distribution and regional divergence for morphological characters. Euphytica 24: 651–659.Google Scholar
Barati, M and Arzani, A (2012) Genetic diversity revealed by EST–SSR markers in cultivated and wild safflower. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 44: 117–123.Google Scholar
Chapman, MA, Hvala, J, Strever, J and Burke, JM (2010) Population genetic analysis of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius; Asteraceae) reveals a near eastern origin and five centres of diversity. American Journal of Botany 97: 831–840.Google Scholar
Chapman, MA, Hvala, J, Strever, J, Matvienko, M, Kozik, A, Michelmore, RW, Tang, S, Knapp, SJ and Burke, JM (2009) Development, polymorphism, and cross-taxon utility of EST–SSR markers from saffower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 120: 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derakhshan, E, Majidi, MM, Sharafi, Y and Mirlohi, A (2014) Discrimination and genetic diversity of cultivated and wild safflowers (Carthamus spp.) using EST–microsatellites markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 54: 130–136.Google Scholar
Doyle, JJ and Doyle, JN (1987) A rapid DNA isolation protocol for small quantity of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15.Google Scholar
Dwivedi, SL, Upadhyaya, HD and Hegde, DM (2005) Development of core collection using geographic information and morphological descriptors in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 821–830.Google Scholar
Earl, DA and von Holdt, BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4: 359–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elfadl, E, Reinbrecht, C and Claupein, W (2010) Evaluation of phenotypic variation in a worldwide germplasm collection of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) grown under organic farming conditions in Germany. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 155–170.Google Scholar
Evanno, G, Regnaut, S and Goudet, J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611–2620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Excoffier, L, Laval, G and Schneider, S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 1: 47–50.Google Scholar
Fernández-Martinez, J, del Rio, M and de Haro, A (1993) Survey of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) germplasm for variants in fatty acid composition and other seed characters. Euphytica 69: 115–122.Google Scholar
Filippi, CV, Aguirre, N, Rivas, JG, Zubrzycki, J, Puebla, A, Cordes, D, Moreno, MV, Fusari, CM, Alvarez, D, Heinz, RA, Hopp, HE, Paniego, NB and Lia, VV (2015) Population structure and genetic diversity characterization of a sunflower association mapping population using SSR and SNP markers. BMC Plant Biology 15: 52.Google Scholar
Garnatje, T, Garcia, S, Vilatersana, R and Vallès, J (2006) Genome size variation in the genus Carthamus (Asteraceae, Cardueae): systematic implications and additive changes during allopolyploidization. Annals of Botany 97: 461–467.Google Scholar
Golkar, P, Arzani, A and Rezaei, MA (2011) Genetic variation in safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) for seed quality related traits and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 12: 2664–2677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamdan, YAS, Garcia-Moreno, MJ, Redondo-Nevado, J, Velasco, L and Perez-Vich, B (2011) Development and characterization of genomic microsatellite markers in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Plant Breeding 130: 237–241.Google Scholar
Hamrick, JL and Godt, MJ (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences 351: 1291–1298.Google Scholar
IBPGR (1983) Safflower Descriptors. Rome: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR), p. 22.Google Scholar
IRRI (2009) Cropstat Version 7.2. Manila: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Johnson, RC, Bergman, JW and Flynn, CR (1999) Oil and meal characteristics of core and non-core safflower accessions from the USDA collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46: 611–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, RC, Kisha, TJ and Evans, MA (2007) Characterizing safflower germplasm with AFLP molecular markers. Crop Science 47: 1728–1736.Google Scholar
Khan, MA, Witzke-Ehbrecht, SV, Maass, BL and Becker, HC (2009) Relationships among different geographical groups, agro-morphology, fatty acid composition and RAPD marker diversity in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostik, V, Memeti, S and Bauer, B (2012) Fatty acid composition of edible oils and fats. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design 4: 112–116.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Ambreen, H, Murali, TV, Bali, S, Agarwal, M, Kumar, A, Goel, S and Jagannath, A (2014) Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure in a global reference collection of 531 accessions of Carthamus tinctorius (safflower) using AFLP markers. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. doi:10.1007/s11105-014-0828-8.Google Scholar
Lee, G-A, Sung, J-S, Lee, SY, Chung, JW, Yi, JY, Kim, YY and Lee, M-C (2014) Genetic assessment of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) collection with microsatellite markers acquired via pyrosequencing method. Molecular Ecology Resources 14: 69–78.Google Scholar
Li, D and Mündel, H-H (1996) Safflower. Carthamus tinctorius L. Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops. 7. Rome: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Liu, K and Muse, SV (2005) PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21: 2128–2129.Google Scholar
Mahasi, MJ, Wachira, FN, Pathak, RS and Riungu, TC (2009) Genetic polymorphism in exotic safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) using RAPD markers. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 1: 008–012.Google Scholar
Majidi, MM and Zadhoush, S (2014) Molecular and morphological variation in a world-wide collection of safflower. Crop Science 54: 2109–2119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayerhofer, R, Archibald, C, Bowles, V and Good, AG (2010) Development of molecular markers and linkage maps for the Carthamus species C. tinctorius and C. oxyacanthus . Genome 53: 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukta, N (2008) Safflower genetic resources in India – an overview. In: Knights, SE and Potter, TD (eds) Safflower: Unexploited Potential and World Adaptability. Proceedings of the 7th International Safflower Conference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia .Google Scholar
Nimbkar, N (2008) Issues in safflower production in India. In: Knights, SE and Potter, TD (eds) Safflower: Unexploited Potential and World Adaptability. Proceedings of the 7th International Safflower Conference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia .Google Scholar
Panahi, B and Neghab, MG (2013) Genetic characterization of Iranian safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) using inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) markers. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 19: 239–243.Google Scholar
Pascual-Villalobos, MJ and Albuquerque, N (1996) Genetic variation of a safflower germplasm collection grown as a winter crop in southern Spain. Euphytica 92: 327–332.Google Scholar
Pearl, SA, Bowers, JE, Reyes-Chin-Wo, S, Michelmore, RW and Burke, JM (2014) Genetic analysis of safflower domestication. BMC Plant Biology 14: 43. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/14/43.Google Scholar
Perrier, X and Jacquemoud-Collet, JP (2006) DARwin software. Available at http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin.Google Scholar
Porras-Hurtado, L, Ruiz, Y, Santos, C, Phillips, C, Carracedo, A and Lareu, MV (2013) An overview of STRUCTURE: applications, parameter settings, and supporting software. Frontiers in Genetics 4: 98. doi:10.3389/fgene.2013.00098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, JK, Stephens, M and Donnelly, P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, ES, Kadirvel, P, Symonds, RC, Geethanjali, S and Ebert, AW (2012) Using SSR markers to map genetic diversity and population structure of Solanum pimpinellifolium for development of a core collection. Plant Genetic Resources 10: 38–48.Google Scholar
Reeves, PA, Panella, LW and Richards, CM (2012) Retention of agronomically important variation in germplasm core collections: implications for allele mining. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124: 1155–1171.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, S, Becker, HC and Witzke-Ehbrecht, SV (2008) Outcrossing rate of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes under the agro climatic conditions of Northern Germany. In: Knights, SE and Potter, TD (eds) Safflower: Unexploited Potential and World Adaptability. Proceedings of the 7th International Safflower Conference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia .Google Scholar
Safavi, SM, Pourdad, SS and Safavi, SA (2012) Assessment of genetic diversity in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes using agro-morphological traits. Annals of Biological Research 3: 2428–2432.Google Scholar
Sehgal, D and Raina, SN (2005) Genotyping safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) cultivars by DNA fingerprints. Euphytica 146: 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, B, Melchinger, AE, Frisch, M, Maurer, HP, Heckenberger, M and Reif, JC (2005) Linkage disequilibrium in European elite maize germplasm investigated with SSRs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111: 723–730.Google Scholar
Talebi, M, Mokhtari, N, Rahimmalek, M and Sahhafi, SR (2012) Molecular characterization of Carthamus tinctorius and C. oxyacanthus germplasm using sequence related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers. Plant Omics Journal 5: 136–142.Google Scholar
Wang, J, Guan, Y, Wang, Y, Zhu, L, Wang, Q, Hu, Q and Hu, J (2014) A strategy for finding the optimal scale of plant core collection based on Monte Carlo Simulation. The Scientific World Journal 2014: 503473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/503473.Google Scholar
Ward, JH Jr (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58: 236–244.Google Scholar
Yaman, H, Tarıkahya-Hacıoğlu, B, Arslan, Y and Subaşi, İ (2014) Molecular characterization of the wild relatives of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in Turkey as revealed by ISSRs. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 61: 595–602.Google Scholar
Yamini, KN, Ramesh, K, Naresh, V, Rajendrakumar, P, Anjani, K and Dinesh Kumar, V (2013) Development of EST–SSR markers and their utility in revealing cryptic diversity in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 22: 90–102.Google Scholar
Yang, Y-X, Wu, W, Zheng, Y-L, Chen, L, Liu, R-J and Huang, C-Y (2007) Genetic diversity and relationships among safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) analyzed by inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 54: 1043–1051.Google Scholar
Yeilaghi, H, Arzani, A, Ghaderian, M, Fotovat, R, Feizi, M and Pourdad, SS (2012) Effect of salinity on seed oil content and fatty acid composition of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes. Food Chemistry 130: 618–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P, Liu, X, Tong, H, Lu, Y and Li, J (2014) Association mapping for important agronomic traits in core collection of rice (Oryza sativa L.) with SSR markers. PLoS ONE 9: e111508. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Usha Kiran supplementary material

Tables S1 and S2

Download Usha Kiran supplementary material(File)
File 28.6 KB