Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:32:38.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic analysis of seedlings characters associated with drought tolerance in cowpea under a controlled environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2017

Amos Afolarin Olajide  and
Christopher Olumuyiwa Ilori
Amos Afolarin Olajide*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Christopher Olumuyiwa Ilori
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cowpea is a major source of vegetable protein but its production is constrained by drought resulting in yield loss. Developing drought tolerance varieties can enhance yield and reduce the need for supplemental irrigation. Breeding for drought tolerance requires the knowledge of its genetic basis. Genetic basis for some seedling traits in cowpea was investigated. Seven generations (P1, P2, F1, RF1, F2, BC1 and BC2) each derived from two crosses involving two highly drought tolerant (Danilla and IT97K-499-35) and one highly susceptible parents (Tvu7778) were evaluated for drought tolerance in the screen house. Data on Seedling height (SH), Seedling terminal leaflet area (SLA), Seedling Vigour (SV) and Recovery Capacity (RC) were collected. The SV was assessed on a scale of 1 (highly-tolerant) – 9 (highly-susceptible), while RC (%) was evaluated at 5 d interval for 30 d. The hybrids F1 and RF1 showed the best performances in both crosses with SV ranged from 2.50 ± 0.00 in Danilla × IT97K-499-35 cross to 6.50 ± 1.00 in the Danilla × TVU7778 cross. In both crosses, F1 and RF1 had 100.0% RC. Both dominance (46.5–68.6%) and additive (31.4–53.5%) effects were found similar and important in all the traits under water stressed. The six-parameter model indicated few cases of gene interactions, mostly dominance × dominance. Narrow sense heritability ranged from 33.5% for SH to 50.1% for SLA in the cross Danilla × TVU7778 at terminal water stress. Inheritance of these traits in cowpea involved both additive and dominance gene action. However, dominance and/or dominance × dominance effects had a more pronounced effect in genetic control of all characters.

Keywords

additive gene actiondominance gene actiondrought tolerancenarrow sense heritabilityrecovery capacityseedling vigour
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , June 2018 , pp. 218 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agbicado, MA (2009) Genetic analysis of abiotic and biotic resistance in cowpea (Vigna unguiculat (L.)) Walp. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilments for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University.Google Scholar
Allard, RW (1960) Principles of Plant Breeding. 1st edn. New York: John Wiley and sons, ISBN, 047102310.Google Scholar
Armento-Soto, JL, Chang, TT, Loresto, GC and O'Toole, JC (1983) Genetics and Breeding for drought tolerance in food legumes. Journal of Society of Advanced Breeding Research in Asia and Oceania 15: 103–116.Google Scholar
Barker, TC, Campos, H, Cooper, M, Dolan, D, Edmeades, GO, Habben, J, Schussler, J, Wrigh, D. and Zinselmeier, C (2005). Improving drought tolerance in maize. Plant Breeding Reviews 25: 173–253.Google Scholar
Burton, GW (1951) Quantitative inheritance in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Agronomy Journal 43: 409–417.Google Scholar
Ehlers, JD and Hall, AE (1997) Cowpea breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 15: 215–275.Google Scholar
Ekanayake, IJ, O'Toole, JC, Garrity, DP and Masajo, TM (1985). Inheritance of root characters and their relations to drought resistance in rice. Crop Science 25: 927–933.Google Scholar
Farshadfar, E, Mahjouri, S and Aghase, M (2008) Detection of epistasis and estimation of additive and dominant component of genetic variation for drought tolerance in Durum wheat. Journal of Biological Sciences 8: 598–603.Google Scholar
Hayman, BI (1958) The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity 12: 371–380.Google Scholar
Hayman, BI and Mather, R (1955) The description of genetic interaction in continuous variation. Biometric 11: 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A and Sharma, SC (2005) Gene action of some seedling traits associated with drought tolerance in bread wheat. Journal of Genetics and Breeding 59: 225–234.Google Scholar
Langyintuo, ASJ, Lowenberg-DeBoer, M, Faye, D, Lambert, G, Ibro, B, Moussa, A, Kergna, S, Kushwaha, S, Musa, and Ntoukam, G (2003) Cowpea supply and demand in West Africa. Field Crops Research 82: 215–231.Google Scholar
Lebreton, CV, Lazic-Jancic, A, Steed, S Pekic and Quarrie, SA (1995) Identifications of QTL for drought response in maize and their use in testing causal relationships between traits. Journal of Experimental Botany 46: 853–865.Google Scholar
Mai-Kodomi, Y, Singh, BB, Myers, JO, Yopp, JH, Gibson, PJ and Terao, T (1999) Two mechanism of drought tolerance in Cowpea. India Journal of Genetics 309–316.Google Scholar
Mather, K (1949) Biometrical Genetics in the Study of Continuous Variation. London: Methun and Company Limited.Google Scholar
Mitra, J (2001) Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in Crop plant. Current Science 80: 758–763.Google Scholar
Muchero, W, Ehlers, JD, Roberts, PA (2008) Seedling stage drought induced phenotypes and drought responsive gene in diverse cowpea genotypes. Crop Science 48: 541–552.Google Scholar
Singh, BB, Mai- Kodomi, Y and Terao, T (1999) A simple screening method for drought tolerance in Cowpea. India Journal of Genetics 59: 211–220.Google Scholar
Singh, BB, Ajeigbe, HA, Tarawali, SA, Fernandez-Rivera, S, Abubakar, M (2003) Improving the production and utilization of cowpea as food and fodder. Field Crops Research 84: 169–177.Google Scholar
Wallace, DH, Ozbun, JL and Munger, HM (1972) Physiological genetics of crop yield. Advances in Agronomy 24: 97–146.Google Scholar
Warner, JN (1552). A method of estimating heritability. Agronomy Journal 44: 427–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, L., Hakoyama, S, Terao, T and Singh, BB (1997) Evaluation method for drought tolerance of cowpea. In: Singh, BB, Mohan Raj, Dashiell, K and Jackai, K. E. N. (eds). Advances in Cowpea Research Complication of International Institute of Tropical Agricultures (IITA) and Japan International Research Centre for Agriculture Science Research Centre for Agriculture Science (JIRCAS). Ibadan: IITA, Nigeria. 141–146.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Olajide and Ilori supplementary material

S1-S3

Download Olajide and Ilori supplementary material(File)
File 16.4 KB