Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:48:23.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiences with descriptors for characterization of medicinal and aromatic plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Friedrich Pank
Friedrich Pank*
Affiliation:
Federal Centre for Breeding Research on Cultivated Plants, Institute of Horticultural Crops, Neuer Weg 22/23, 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Well-defined descriptors are an indispensable tool for management, maintenance and utilization of plant genetic resources. The International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) and national authorities have published descriptor lists for a great variety of agricultural and horticultural crops, but only for a few species belonging to the group of medicinal and aromatic plants (MAP). Forty years of experiences with the use of descriptors in MAP mainly in the field of breeding research are communicated to support forthcoming efforts in elaborating new descriptors lists. The deliberations focus on some specifics of these minor crops, classifying the descriptors to the following groups: object, experimental data, sample specification, characteristics—growth, development, flower and reproduction biology, cytological traits, molecular traits, biotic and abiotic stress susceptibility, yield, quality differentiated in morphology-dependent quality traits, constituents, sensory quality, and impurities. MAP-specific descriptors are exemplified and the principles of important determination methods are explained. Most of the general available UPOV and IPGRI descriptors are applicable also for MAP.

Keywords

analysisbreedingdevelopmentgrowthqualitysample specificationstressyield
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , August 2005 , pp. 190 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bundessortenamt (1995) Richtlinien für Wertprüfungen und Sortenversuche im Gemüsebau [Guidelines for the Testing of the Value for Cultivation and Use of Vegetables] Hannover Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH, p. 25Google Scholar
Bundessortenamt (2004) Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability. Guidelines medical and aromatic plants 2004, http://www.bundessortenamt.de/internet20_engl/.Google Scholar
DIN 10228 (1995) Untersuchung von Gewürzen und würzenden Zutaten. Bestimmung des ätherischen Ölgehaltes. Destillationsverfahren [Analysis of Spices and Condiments. Determination of Essential Oil Content. Distillation Method] 1995–12. ICS 67.220.10. DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V Berlin Beuth, p. 4Google Scholar
EDQM (2002) European Pharmacopoeia 4th edn Strasbourg European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines of the Council of EuropeGoogle Scholar
Franke, J, Pank, F and Ahne, R (1996) Thousand seed weight determination on annual caraway (Carum carvi L. var. annuum Hort.) by image analysis. Züchtungsforschung. Berichte aus der Bundesanstalt für Züchtungsforschung an Kulturpflanzen 2: 426–428.Google Scholar
Gildemeister, E (1966) Die ätherischen Öle Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Givan, AL (1993) Flow Cytometry: First Principles. New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
Hoberg, E, Pank, F, Ulrich, D and Schulz, H (1997) Qualitätsforschung und -analytik als Beitrag zur Züchtungsforschung und Züchtung an gartenbaulichen Kulturen. Beispiele für Obst, Gemüse sowie Arznei- und Gewürzpflanzen [Quality research and analytics as contribution to breeding research and breeding on horticultural crops. Examples of fruits, vegetables and medicinal and aromatic plants]. Beiträge zur Züchtungsforschung. Bundesanstalt für Züchtungsforschung an Kulturpflanzen 3: 11–25.Google Scholar
IPGRI (2004) Descriptors lists, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, http://www.ipgri.cgiar.org/system/page.asp?theme=6.Google Scholar
Klocke, E, Langbehn, J, Grewe, C and Pank, F (2002) DNA fingerprinting by RAPD on Origanum majorana L. Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants 9: 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbehn, J, Pank, F, Novak, J, Blüthner, WD, Franz, Ch, Franke, J, Junghanns, W and Vender, C (2001) Development of a hybrid variety system in marjoram (Origanum majorana L.). Characterization of the pollinator populations. Euphytica 118: 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luckner, M (1966) Prüfung von Drogen [Testing of Drugs]. Jena: VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag p. 168Google Scholar
Mewes, S and Pank, F (2005) Neue Erkenntnisse zur Ausprägung der Gynodiözie bei Thymian (Thymus vulgaris L.) [New insights into the expression of gynodioecy of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.)]. Zeitschrift für Arznei- & Gewürzpflanzen 9:Google Scholar
Novak, J, Junghanns, W, Blüthner, WD, Marchart, R, Vender, C, van Niekerk, L, Pank, F, Langbehn, J and Franz, Ch (2002) Combining ability of Origanum majorana L. hybrids: sensorial quality. Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants 9: 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pank, F (2000) Heil- und Gewürzpflanzen aus der Sicht des Pflanzenzüchters. 3. Mitteilung: Kümmel (Carum carvi L.) [Medicinal and aromatic plants from the view of the plant breeder: caraway (Carum carvi L.)]. Beiträge zur Züchtungsforschung. Bundesanstalt für Züchtungsforschung an Kulturpflanzen 6: 31–45.Google Scholar
Pank, F, Schmidt, W, Schrader, O and Marx, G (1999) Characters of peppermint cultivars (Mentha × piperita L.) with different chromosome numbers. Journal of Essential Oil Research 11: 246–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pank, F, Schnäckel, W, Schröder, A, Langbehn, J and Junghanns, W (2000) Majoranfarbe als qualitätsbestimmendes Merkmal. Zusammenhang zwischen visueller Beurteilung und spektrometrischer Messung [Colour of marjoram as parameter of quality. Relation between visual and measured colour]. Fleischwirtschaft 80: 89–92.Google Scholar
Pank, F, Matzk, F, Kästner, U, Blüthner, WD, Foltys, de, Garcie, E, Meister, A, Ryschka, U and Schumann, G (2003 a) Reproductive diversity and strategies for breeding in St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.). Euphytica 134: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pank, F, Taubenrauch, K, Pfeffer, S, Krüger, H (2003 b) Eigenschaften von Sorten und Herkünften des Fenchels (Foeniculum vulgare Mill. ssp. vulgare) im Vergleich [Characteristics of fennel cultivars and provenances (Foeniculum vulgare Mill. ssp. vulgare) by comparison]. Zeitschrift für Arznei- & Gewürzpflanzen 8: 68–73.Google Scholar
Reich, E and Blatter, A (2002) Einsatzmöglichkeiten der HPTLC zur qualitativen und quantitativen Analyse von Arzneipflanzen [Applications of HPTLC for qualitative and quantitative analysis of medicinal plants]. Zeitschrift für Arznei- & Gewürzpflanzen 7: 416–421.Google Scholar
Schneider, E, Pank, F, Koball, G, Foltys, de, Garcia, E, Dehe, M, Blüthner, WD (2002) Einfluss des Genotypus auf die Cadmiumaufnahme des Johanniskrautes (Hypericum perforatum L.) [Influence of genotype and environment on cadmium accumulation of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.)]. Zeitschrift für Arznei- & Gewürzpflanzen 7: 329–335.Google Scholar
Scholze, P, Pank, F, Foltys, de, Garcia, E, Blüthner, WD, Dehe, M and Schneider, E (2001) Bewertung der Anfälligkeit von Johanniskraut (Hypericum perforatum L.) gegenüber der Johanniskrautwelke (Colletotrichum cf. gloeosporioides) [Valuation of the susceptibility of St. John's-wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) to the wilt disease caused by Colletotrichum cf. gloeosporioides ]. Zeitschrift für Arznei- & Gewürzpflanzen 6: 209–215.Google Scholar
Schulz, H, Steuer, B, Krüger, H and Schütze, W (2001) Möglichkeiten und Grenzen NIR-spektroskopischer Qualitätsbestimmung pflanzlicher Drogen [Potentials and limits for quality analysis of herbal drugs by NIR spectroscopy]. Zeitschrift für Arznei- & Gewürzpflanzen 6: 138–142.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, B (2002) Aktuelle Qualitätsanforderungen an pflanzliche Arzneimittel [Current quality requirements for herbal medicinal products]. Zeitschrift für Arznei- & Gewürzpflanzen 7: 74–84.Google Scholar
Taubenrauch, K, Gabler, J, Rabenstein, F, Pank, F and Hau, B (2001) Erste Ergebnisse zur Sortenanfälligkeit von Arzneifenchel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) gegenüber Mycosphaerella anethi Petr. [First results on the susceptibility of bitter fennel cultivars (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) to Mycosphaerella anethi Petr.]. Zeitschrift für Arznei- & Gewürzpflanzen 6: 120–124.Google Scholar
UPOV (2002) General introduction to the examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability and the development of harmonized descriptions of new varieties of plants, TG 1/3, International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, 19 April, http://www.upov.int/en/publications/tg-rom/tg001/tg_1_3.pdf.Google Scholar
UPOV (2004) Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability, International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, http://www.upov.int/de/publications/tg-rom/tg_index.htm.Google Scholar