Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:26:42.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of wild barley species as possible sources of drought tolerance for arid environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Mohammad Barati ,
Mohammad Mahdi Majidi ,
Fateme Mostafavi ,
Aghafakhr Mirlohi ,
Maryam Safari  and
Zohre Karami
Mohammad Barati
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
Mohammad Mahdi Majidi*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
Fateme Mostafavi
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
Aghafakhr Mirlohi
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
Maryam Safari
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
Zohre Karami
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 88186-34141, Iran
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, agro-morphological and yield-related traits associated with drought tolerance in 80 barley genotypes belonging to 15 wild species together with the cultivated one, and their potential to improve adaptation to different levels of drought stress conditions (moisture environments) were studied. There was significant genetic variation among the genotypes and species for all of the measured traits, as well as differential responses of genotypes across environments. The results indicated high variation for grain yield (GY) under drought stress among the genotypes, and that some of the wild genotypes had consistently superior specific adaptation to the water stress conditions. The genotypes belong to wild barley species, especially Hordeum murinum and Hordeum marinum had lower GY but relatively higher yield stability under different environments. Traits such as number of seed per plant and hundred kernel weight were positively correlated with GY in all of the environments. High negative correlation between GY and days to ripening was observed only under intense drought environment, showing drought escape as a strategy of wild plants under highly stressed conditions. Grouping of the genotypes by principal component analysis completely separated cultivated barley and its progenitor (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) from other wild genotypes; however, the other wild species were slightly separated from each other. In addition, the Iranian and foreign genotypes did not completely separate from each other. The identified wild barley genotypes with favourable characters and high drought tolerance could be used in genetic studies and barley improvement programmes especially for drought stress.

Keywords

barleyclimate changesdroughtspecific adaptationwild relatives
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , June 2018 , pp. 209 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, RG, Pereira, LS and Smith, RD (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56: 41–51.Google Scholar
Barati, M, Majidi, MM, Mirlohi, A, Pirnajmodini, F and Sharif-Moghaddam, N (2015) Response of cultivated and wild barley germplasm to drought stress at different developmental stages. Crop Science 55: 2668–2681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, M, Grando, S, Backes, G, Jahoor, A, Sabbagh, A and Ceccarelli, S (2003) QTLs for agronomic traits in the Mediterranean environment identified in recombinant inbred lines of the cross’ Arta’ × H. spontaneum 41-1. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 1215–1225.Google Scholar
Bean, EW (1972) Clonal evaluation for increased seed production in two species of forage grasses, Festuca arundinacea Schreb. and Phleum pratense L. Euphytica 21: 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, PM, Sterling, M, Spink, JH, Baker, CJ, Sylvester-Bradley, R, Mooney, SJ, Tams, AR and Ennos, AR (2004) Understanding and reducing lodging in cereals. In: Sparks, DL (ed.) Advances in Agronomy. Elsevier, pp. 217–271.Google Scholar
Blum, A (2011) Plant Breeding for Water Limited Environments. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Brown, AHD, Nevo, E, Zohary, D and Dagan, O (1978) Genetic variation in natural populations of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum). Genetica 49: 97–108.Google Scholar
El Madidi, S, Diani, Z and Aameur, FB (2005) Variation of agro-morphological characters in Moroccan barley landraces under near optimal and drought conditions. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 831–838.Google Scholar
Hamdi, A and Erskine, W (1996) Reaction of wild species of the genus Lens to drought. Euphytica 91: 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivandic, V, Hackett, CA, Zhang, Z, Staub, JE, Nevo, E, Thomas, WTB and Forster, BP (2000) Phenotypic responses of wild barley to experimentally imposed water stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 2021–2029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, RA and Wichern, DW (2007) Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 4th edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, INC, p. 56.Google Scholar
Johnston, PA, Timmerman-Vaughan, GM, Farnden, KJ and Pickering, R (2009) Marker development and characterisation of Hordeum bulbosum introgression lines: a resource for barley improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118: 1429–1437.Google Scholar
Lakew, B, Eglinton, J, Henry, RJ, Baum, M, Grando, S and Ceccarelli, S (2011) The potential contribution of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) germplasm to drought tolerance of cultivated barley (H. vulgare ssp. vulgare). Field Crops Research 120: 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mano, Y and Takeda, K (1998) Genetic resources of salt tolerance in wild Hordeum species. Euphytica 103: 137–141.Google Scholar
Morrell, PL and Clegg, MT (2011) Hordeum. In: Kole, C (ed.) Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources, Cereals. Springer, pp. 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (2008) User's guide. Release 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Inst. Inc.Google Scholar
Shakhatreh, Y, Kafawin, O, Ceccarelli, S and Saoub, H (2001) Selection of barley lines for drought tolerance in low rainfall areas. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 186: 119–127.Google Scholar
Shakhatreh, Y, Haddad, N, Alrababah, M, Grando, S and Ceccarelli, S (2010) Phenotypic diversity in wild barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ssp. spontaneum (C. Koch) Thell.) accessions collected in Jordan. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 131–146.Google Scholar
Terzi, V, Pecchioni, N, Faccioli, P, Kucera, L and Stanca, AM (2001) Phyletic relationships within the genus Hordeum using PCR-based markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 48: 447–458.Google Scholar
Van Oosterom, EJ and Acevedo, E (1992) Adaptation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) to harsh Mediterranean environments. Euphytica 62: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volis, S, Mendlinger, S, Olsvig-Whittaker, L, Safriel, UN and Orlovsky, N (1998) Phenotypic variation and stress resistance in core and peripheral populations of Hordeum spontaneum. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 799–813.Google Scholar
Walker, WR (1989) Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Surface Irrigation System. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 45. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Yazdchi, S (2008) Evaluation of yield and some characteristics of ten spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) varieties under limited and non limited irrigation. Research Journal of Biological Science 3: 1456–1459.Google Scholar
Zadoks, JC, Chang, TT and Konzak, F (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed research 14: 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J, Sun, H, Dai, H, Zhang, G and Wu, F (2010) Difference in response to drought stress among Tibet wild barley genotypes. Euphytica 172: 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Barati supplementary material

Tables S1-S3 and Figures S1-S2

Download Barati supplementary material(File)
File 67.3 KB