Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:02:19.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of resistance to stemphylium blight in interspecific recombinant inbred lines derived from Lens culinaris × Lens ervoides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2020

Stanley Adobor Open the ORCID record for Stanley Adobor [Opens in a new window] ,
Rajib Podder ,
Sabine Banniza  and
Albert Vandenberg
Stanley Adobor*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences and Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada
Rajib Podder
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences and Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada
Sabine Banniza
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences and Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada
Albert Vandenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences and Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cultivated lentil suffers yield loss from stemphylium blight, caused by Stemphylium botryosum Wallr. Identification of sources of stemphylium blight resistance and knowledge of the mode of inheritance of resistance are important for developing resistant cultivars. The interspecific recombinant inbred line (RIL) population developed from a cross between the moderately resistant parent Lens culinaris cv. ‘Eston’ and the resistant parent L. ervoides (Brign.) Grande accession IG 72815 was evaluated for stemphylium blight resistance under controlled conditions at the University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, and under field conditions at the Pulses Research Centre (PRC), Ishurdi, Bangladesh. We hypothesized that resistance from both parents will lead to transgressive segregation indicative of pyramiding of resistance genes from the same. However, no resistant transgressive segregants were observed in the RIL population. A large proportion (50%) of the RILs had disease severity levels similar to the resistant parent IG 72815 in experiments conducted under natural disease pressure in Bangladesh. Under controlled conditions in Saskatoon, 38% of RILs had resistance levels similar to IG 72815. Across all environments, 14 RILs consistently had resistance levels similar to IG 72815. The distribution of disease severity scores for all RILs indicated polygenic inheritance of stemphylium blight resistance in the population. RILs with consistent resistant reactions should prove useful for lentil improvement programmes. This will contribute to increasing the productivity of lentil crops in North America and the Indo-Gangetic region, which account for more than 68% of world lentil production.

Keywords

crop wild relativedurable resistancelentilRIL populationStemphylium botryosum
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , August 2020 , pp. 251 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong-Cho, C, Wang, J, Wei, Y and Banniza, S (2012) The infection process of two pathogenic races of Colletotrichum truncatum on lentil. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 34: 58–67.10.1080/07060661.2012.664565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayaa, B and Erskine, W (1998) Diseases of lentil. In: Allen, DJ and Lenne, JM (eds) The Pathology of Food and Pasture Legumes. Wallingford: CAB International in association with the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), pp. 442–443.Google Scholar
Bayaa, B, Erskine, W and Hamdi, A (1994) Response of wild lentil to Ascochyta fabae f.sp. lentis from Syria. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 41: 61–65.10.1007/BF00053049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhadauria, V, Ramsay, L, Bett, KE and Banniza, S (2017) QTL Mapping reveals genetic determinants of fungal disease resistance in the wild lentil species Lens ervoides. Scientific Reports 7: 1–9.10.1038/s41598-017-03463-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caudillo-Ruiz, KB, Bhadauria, V and Banniza, S (2017) Aetiology of stemphylium blight on lentil in Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 39: 422–432.10.1080/07060661.2017.1378728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, AM, Ahmed, A, Zaman, M and Bakr, MA (1996) Sporulation of Stemphylium botryosum Wallr. Journal of Mycopathological Research 34: 69–71.Google Scholar
Cubero, JI, Pérez de la Vega, M and Fratini, R (2009) Origin, phylogeny, domestication and spread. In: Erskine, W, Muehlbauer, FJ, Sarker, A, and Sharma, B (eds) The Lentil: Botany, Production and Uses. Wallingford, UK: CABI, pp. 13–33.10.1079/9781845934873.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, W and Sarker, A (1996) Lentil: the Bangladesh breakthrough. ICARDA Caravan 6: 8–9.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT (2018) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) FAOSTAT Database.Google Scholar
Ferguson, M (2000) Lens spp: Conserved resources, priorities for collection and future prospects – Linking Research and Marketing Opportunities for Pulses in the 21st Century: Proceedings of the Third International Food Legumes Research Conference. In: Knight, R (ed). Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, pp. 613–620.Google Scholar
Ferguson, EM and Robertson, DL (1999) Morphological and phenological variation in the wild relatives of lentil. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46: 3–12.10.1023/A:1008645029658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiala, JV, Tullu, A, Banniza, S, Séguin-Swartz, G and Vandenberg, A (2009) Interspecies transfer of resistance to anthracnose in lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.). Crop Science 49: 825–830.10.2135/cropsci2008.05.0260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford-Lloyd, BV, Schmidt, M, Armstrong, SJ, Barazani, O, Engels, J, Hadas, R, Hammer, K, Kell, SP, Kang, D, Khoshbakht, K, Li, Y, Long, C, Lu, B-R, Ma, K, Nguyen, VT, Qiu, L, Ge, S, Wei, W, Zhang, Z and Maxted, N (2011) Crop wild relatives – undervalued, underutilized and under threat? BioScience 61: 559–565.10.1525/bio.2011.61.7.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajjar, R and Hodgkin, T (2007) The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 156: 1–13.10.1007/s10681-007-9363-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haussmann, BIG, Parzies, HK, Presterl, T, Susic, Z and Miedaner, T (2004) Plant genetic resources in crop improvement. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 2: 3–21.10.1079/PGR200430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, P, Materne, M, Rodda, MS and Slater, AT (2017) Screening lentil germplasm for stemphylium blight resistance. Australasian Plant Pathology 46: 129–136.10.1007/s13313-017-0469-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khazaei, H, Subedi, M, Nickerson, M, Martinez-Villaluenga, C, Frias, J and Vandenberg, A (2019) Seed protein of lentils: current status, progress, and food applications. Foods 8: 391.10.3390/foods8090391CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, P (2007) Genetics of resistance to Stemphylium leaf blight of lentil (Lens culinaris) in the croos barimasur-4 x CDC Milestone. University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
Maxted, N, Kell, SP and Ford-Lloyd, BV (2008) Crop wild relative conservation and use: establishing the context. In: Maxted, N, Ford-Lloyd, BV, Kell, SP, Iriondo, JM, Dulloo, ME and Turok, J (eds). Crop Wild Relative Conservation and Use. CABI: Wallingford, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
McCouch, S, Baute, GJ, Bradeen, J, Bramel, P, Bretting, PK, Buckler, E, Burke, JM, Charest, D, Cloutier, S, Cole, G, Dempewolf, H, Dingkuhn, M, Feuillet, C, Gepts, P, Grattapaglia, D, Guarino, L, Jackson, S, Knapp, S, Langridge, P, Lawton-Rauh, A, Lijua, Q, Lusty, C, Michaels, T, Myles, S, Naito, K, Nelson, RL, Pontarollo, R, Richards, CM, Rieseberg, L, Ross-Ibarra, J, Rounsley, S, Hamilton, RS, Schurr, U, Stein, N, Tomooka, N, van der Knaap, E, van Tassel, D, Toll, J, Valls, J, Varshney, RK, Ward, J, Waugh, R and Zamir, D (2013) Feeding the future. Nature 499: 23–24.10.1038/499023aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrall, RAA, Carriere, B, Ernst, B, Pearse, C, Schmeling, D, Thomson, L (2006) Seed-borne pathogens of lentil in Saskatchewan in 2005. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 86: 104–105.Google Scholar
Morrall, RAA, Vandenberg, A and Banniza, S (2004) Recent developments in lentil pathology in Canada. Proceedings of the 5th Canadian Pulse Research Workshop. London, ON.Google Scholar
Mwakutuya, E, Vandenberg, B and Banniza, S (2006) Influence of leaf wetness duration, interrupted wetness periods, and temperature on the development of stemphylium blight [Stemphylium bottyosum] on lentil. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology-Revue Canadienne De Phytopathologie 28: 334.Google Scholar
Perrino, EV and Perrino, P (2020) Crop wild relatives: know how past and present to improve future research, conservation and utilization strategies, especially in Italy: a review. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 67: 1067–1105.10.1007/s10722-020-00930-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podder, R, Banniza, S and Vandenberg, A (2013) Screening of wild and cultivated lentil germplasm for resistance to stemphylium blight. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterisation and Utilisation 11: 26–35.10.1017/S1479262112000329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott-Allen, R and Prescott-Allen, C (2013) Genes from the Wild: Using Wild Genetic Resources for Food and Raw Materials. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315066769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieseberg, LH, Archer, MA and Wayne, RK (1999) Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83: 363–372.10.1038/sj.hdy.6886170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saha, GC (2009) Mapping of foliar disease resistance genes and genes for agro-morphological traits in Lens culinaris Medik. Washington State University.Google Scholar
Sarker, A, Erskine, W, Bakr, MA, Rahman, MM, Afzal, MA and Saxena, MC (2004) Lentil Improvement in Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI), FAO-RAP, Maliwan Mansion, Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Saxton, A (1998) A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in proc mixed. Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA. pp. 1243–1246.Google Scholar
Sharma, B (2009) Genetics of economic traits. In: Erskine, W, Muehlbauer, FJ, Sarker, A, and Sharma, A (eds) The Lentil: Botany, Production and Uses. Wallingford, UK: CABI International, pp. 76–101.10.1079/9781845934873.0076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M, Kumar, S, Basandrai, AK, Basandrai, D, Malhotra, N, Saxena, DR, Gupta, D, Sarker, A and Singh, K (2020) Evaluation and identification of wild lentil accessions for enhancing genetic gains of cultivated varieties. PLoS One 15: e0229554.10.1371/journal.pone.0229554CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slinkard, AE (1981) Eston lentil. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 61: 733–734.10.4141/cjps81-104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subedi, M (2018) Genetic and agronomic effects on milling qualities of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). University of Saskatchewan.10.5539/jas.v10n10p88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanksley, SD and McCouch, SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science (New York, N.Y.) 277: 1063–1066.10.1126/science.277.5329.1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tester, M and Langridge, P (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science (New York, N.Y.) 327: 818–822.10.1126/science.1183700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullu, A, Buchwaldt, L, Lulsdorf, M, Banniza, S, Barlow, B, Slinkard, AE, Sarker, A, Tar'an, B, Warkentin, T and Vandenberg, A (2006) Sources of resistance to anthracnose (Colletotrichum truncatum) in wild Lens species. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53: 111–119.10.1007/s10722-004-1586-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullu, A, Banniza, S, Tar'an, B, Warkentin, T and Vandenberg, A (2010) Sources of resistance to ascochyta blight in wild species of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57: 1053–1063.10.1007/s10722-010-9547-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullu, A, Bett, K, Banniza, S, Vail, S and Vandenberg, A (2013) Widening the genetic base of cultivated lentil through hybridization of Lens culinaris ‘Eston’ and L. ervoides Accession IG 72815. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 93: 1037–1047.10.4141/cjps2013-072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschefsky, E, Penmetsa, RV, Cook, DR and von Wettberg, EJB (2014) Back to the wilds: tapping evolutionary adaptations for resilient crops through systematic hybridization with crop wild relatives. American Journal of Botany 101: 1791–1800.10.3732/ajb.1400116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziesman, B, Peru, C, Jacob, C, Ippolito, J, Kindrachuk, K, Chant, S, Robberts, S and Banniza, S (2019) 2018 Survey of Lentil diseases in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 41: 162–165.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Adobor et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Adobor et al. supplementary material(File)
File 34.4 KB