Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:18:44.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dual-purpose landraces of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) as sources of high stover and grain yield for arid zone environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

O. P. Yadav  and
F. R. Bidinger
O. P. Yadav*
Affiliation:
Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
F. R. Bidinger
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 324, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both stover and grain are important considerations in the adoption of the new pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) cultivars in crop–livestock farming system in north-west India. Local landrace germplasm contains many of the traits needed to breed new cultivars, which met such requirements. We evaluated 169 pearl millet landraces to assess their potential for breeding new open-pollinated varieties, and measured heterosis in landrace testcrosses to evaluate their potential for topcross hybrids breeding. There were significant differences among landraces in their total biomass, grain yield and stover yield. A high accumulation of biomass, followed by its efficient partitioning, was crucial in determining grain productivity under arid zone. There was also no trade-off between stover and grain productivity and several landraces outperformed check cultivars in both grain and stover yields. The manifestation of heterosis in the landrace-based topcross hybrids varied for different traits. Significant heterosis for biomass, grain yield and stover yield was observed in specific male-sterile seed parent × landrace-based pollinator combinations. Utilization of landraces in variety development and topcross hybrids breeding programmes targeting north-western India or similar regions are discussed.

Keywords

adaptationarid zoneimproved cultivarslandracespearl milletstover productivitytopcross hybrids
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , August 2008 , pp. 73 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appa Rao, S, Mengesha, MH, Vyas, KL and Rajagopal Reddy, C (1986) Evaluation of pearl millet germplasm from Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 56: 4–9.Google Scholar
Bhatnagar, SK, Yadav, OP and Gautam, RC (1998) Research achievements in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 68: 423–430.Google Scholar
Bidinger, FR, Weltzien, RE, Mahalakshmi, V, Singh, SD and Rao, KP (1994) Evaluation of landrace topcross hybrids of pearl millet for arid zone environments. Euphytica 76: 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidinger, FR, Yadav, OP and Sharma, MM (2002) Male-sterile parents for breeding landrace-based topcross hybrids of pearl millet for arid conditions. I. Productivity, responsiveness and stability. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 62: 121–127.Google Scholar
Bidinger, FR, Yadav, OP, Sharma, MM, van Oosterom, EJ and Yadav, YP (2003) Exploitation of heterosis for simultaneous improvement in both grain and stover yields of arid zone pearl millet. Field Crops Research 83: 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A, Blumell, M, Thorpe, W, Bidinger, FR and Hash, CT (2004) Sorghum and pearl millet as food-feed crops in India. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 4: 1–15.Google Scholar
Hash, CT and Witcombe, JR (2002) Gene management and breeding for downy mildew resistance. In: Leslie, JF (ed.) Sorghum and Millets Diseases. Ames, IA: Iowa State Press, pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
Kelley, TG, Parathasarathy Rao, P, Weltzien, ER and Purohit, ML (1996) Adoption of improved cultivars of pearl millet in an arid environment: straw yield and quality considerations in western Rajasthan. Experimental Agriculture 32: 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khairwal, IS and Singh, S (1999) Quantitative and qualitative traits. In: Khairwal, IS, Rai, KN, Harinarayana, G and Andrews, DJ (eds) Pearl Millet Breeding. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., pp. 119–135.Google Scholar
Khairwal, IS and Yadav, OP (2005) Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) improvement in India – retrospect and prospects. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 75: 183–191.Google Scholar
van Oosterom, EJ, Whitaker, ML and Weltzien Rattunde, E (1996) Integrating genotype-environment analysis, characterisation of drought patterns and farmer preferences to identify adaptive plant traits for pearl millet. In: Cooper, M and Hammer, GL (eds) Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement. Wallingford: CAB International/IRRI/ICRISAT, pp. 383–402.Google Scholar
van Oosterom, EJ, Bidinger, FR and Weltzien, RE (2003) A yield architecture framework to explain adaptation of pearl millet to environmental stress. Field Crops Research 80: 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virk, DS (1988) Biometrical analysis in pearl millet – a review. Crop Improvement 15: 1–29.Google Scholar
Virk, DS and Mangat, BK (1991) Detection of cross over genotype × environment interactions in pearl millet. Euphytica 52: 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vom Brocke, K, Presterl, T, Christinck, A, Weltzien, RE and Geiger, HH (2002) Farmers' seed management practices open up new base populations for pearl millet breeding in a semi-arid zone of India. Plant Breeding 121: 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vom Brocke, K, Christinck, A, Presterl, T, Weltzien, RE and Geiger, HH (2003) Effects of farmers' seed management on performance and adaptation of pearl millet in Rajasthan, India. Euphytica 130: 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weltzien, ER and King, SB (1995) Recurrent selection for downy mildew resistance in pearl millet. Plant Breeding 114: 308–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcombe, JR (1999) Population improvement. In: Khairwal, IS, Rai, KN, Harinarayana, G and Andrews, DJ (eds) Pearl Millet Breeding. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., pp. 213–256.Google Scholar
Yadav, OP (2004) CZP 9802 – a new drought-tolerant cultivar of pearl millet. Indian Farming 54: 15–17.Google Scholar
Yadav, OP and Bidinger, FR (2007) Utilization, diversification and improvement of landraces for enhancing pearl millet productivity in arid environments. Annals of Arid Zone, 46: 49–57.Google Scholar
Yadav, OP Weltzien, RE (1998) New Populations of Pearl Millet for Rajasthan, India. Integrated Systems Project Report No. 10. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India, pp. 88.Google Scholar
Yadav, OP and Weltzien, ER (2000) Differential response of pearl millet landrace-based populations and high yielding varieties in contrasting environments. Annals of Arid Zone 39: 39–45.Google Scholar
Yadav, OP, Weltzien, ER, Bidinger, FR and Mahalakshmi, V (2000) Heterosis in landrace-based topcross hybrids of pearl millet across arid environments. Euphytica 112: 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, OP, Weltzien-Rattunde, E and Bidinger, FR (2003a) Genetic variation for drought response among landraces of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 63: 37–40.Google Scholar
Yadav, OP, Bidinger, FR and Sharma, MM (2003b) Male-sterile seed parents for breeding landrace-based topcross hybrids of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) for arid conditions. III. Matching A-lines and specific target environments. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 63: 106–114.Google Scholar