Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:46:54.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domestication of Phoebe cooperiana in the Eastern Himalayas: population variation in morphological and biochemical fruit parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2020

Narang Dolley ,
Nicolee Lyngdoh Open the ORCID record for Nicolee Lyngdoh [Opens in a new window] ,
Siddhartha Singh ,
Mayanglambam Chandrakumar Singh ,
Mongjam Bishwapati Devi  and
Budhindra Nath Hazarika
Narang Dolley
Affiliation:
Department of Tree Improvement, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh-791102, India
Nicolee Lyngdoh*
Affiliation:
Department of Tree Improvement, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh-791102, India
Siddhartha Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Sciences, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh-791102, India
Mayanglambam Chandrakumar Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Sciences, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh-791102, India
Mongjam Bishwapati Devi
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Sciences, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh-791102, India
Budhindra Nath Hazarika
Affiliation:
Hazarika Office of the Dean, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh-791102, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phoebe cooperiana U.N Kanjilal ex A. Das is an indigenous forest tree species yielding fruits consumed widely across the state of Arunachal Pradesh, India. As part of an initiative to domesticate the species, phenotypic variation in fruit and seed morphology as well as the biochemical properties of the pulp were assessed for 14 populations within the state. Nine fruit and seed characters were measured and 12 biochemical parameters of the fruits were analysed. Five trees were selected from each population and a minimum of 30 fruits were collected from each tree. Analysis of variance indicated significant variation in all fruit and seed morphological parameters. The coefficient of variation for fruit weight was reported to be 5.02%, seed weight 5.60%, pulp weight 5.36% and pulp fruit ratio 4.14%. Among biochemical parameters which are of nutritive value, crude protein, vitamin E and A were higher than that found in most common fruits and vegetables. These traits also showed significant variation among the 14 selected populations with crude protein values ranging between 5.99 and 10.76%, vitamin E between 4.80 and 7.33 mg/100 g and vitamin A between 1.88 and 3.13 mg/100 g. The fruits are also high in phenol with a mean value of 22.19 mg/g and displayed promising 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging properties averaging 56.94% antioxidant activity. However, cyanogen content in the fruits was higher than the permissible amount for human consumption, for which processing is recommended before use. The opportunities for domestication are discussed and some promising traits and populations that can be utilized in the domestication programme are identified.

Keywords

domesticationfruit characterizationindigenous fruit treesPhoebe cooperiana
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , August 2020 , pp. 259 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abasse, T, Weber, JC, Katkore, B, Boureima, M, Larwanou, M and Kalinganire, A (2011) Morphological variation in Balanites aegyptiaca fruits and seeds within and among parkland agroforests in eastern Niger. Agroforestry Systems 81: 57–66.10.1007/s10457-010-9323-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinnifesi, FK, Kwesiga, F, Mhango, J, Chilanga, T, Mkonda, A, Kadu, CAC, Kadzere, I, Mithofer, D, Saka, JDK, Sileshi, G, Ramadhani, T and Dhliwayo, P (2006) Towards the development of miombo fruit trees as commercial tree crops in Southern Africa. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 16: 103–121.10.1080/14728028.2006.9752548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anegbeh, PO, Usoro, C, Ukafor, V, Tchoundjeu, Z, Leakey, RRB and Schrecbenberg, K (2003) Domestication of Irvingia gabonensis. Phenotypic variation of fruit and kernels in Nigerian village. Agroforestry System 58: 213–218.10.1023/A:1026094021408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (1976) The wealth of India: raw materials. Publication and Information. Directorate, New Delhi.10, pp. 100–105.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2005) Cyanogenic glycosides in cassava and bamboo shoots: a human health assessment. Food Standards, Australia New Zealand. Technical report, Series no. 28, Canberra, FSANZ, Australia, 22 pp.Google Scholar
Ashine, T, Vasudeva, R, Sthapit, BR, Parthasarathy, VA, Reddy, BMC and Rao, RV (2015) Domestication potential of aromatic pickle-mango (Appemidi) types in the Central Western Ghats, India. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resource 28: 106–116.10.5958/0976-1926.2015.00014.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assogbadjo, AE, Glele, KR, Edon, S, Kyndt, T and Sinsin, B (2011) Natural variation in fruit characteristics, seed germination and seedling growth of Adansonia digitata L. in Benin. New Forests 41: 113–125.10.1007/s11056-010-9214-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balemie, K and Kebebew, F (2006) Ethnobotanical study of wild edible plants in Derashe and Kucha Districts, South Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2: 53.10.1186/1746-4269-2-53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, YM, Downey, P, Fowler, SV, Hill, R, Memmot, J, Norambuena, H and Wittenberg, R (2003) Are invasives bigger? A global study of seed size variation in two invasive shrubs. Ecology 84: 434–1440.10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1434:AIBAGS]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, LA and Palmer, GH (1978) Pectin. In: Spiller GA (ed.) Topics in Dietary Fiber Research. Boston: Springer, pp. 105–115.10.1007/978-1-4684-2481-2_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, G (2020) Current status of production and processing of fruits. Fruit Production and Processing Technology. Waltham Abbey Essex, United Kingdom: ED-Tech Press, pp. 9–45.Google Scholar
Chapman, JL and Reiss, MJ (2000) Ecology, Principles and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
El Kahkahi, R, Zouhair, R, Diouri, M, AitChitt, M and Errakhi, R (2015) Morphological and biochemical characterization of Morocco carob tree (Ceratonia siliqua L.). International Journal of Biological Medical Research 6: 4946–4952.Google Scholar
Falconer, J and Koppell, CR (1990) The major significance of minor forest products. The local use and value of forests in the West African humid forest zone (No. FAO CFN-6). FAO, Roma (Italia).Google Scholar
García, D, Zamora, R, Gómez, JM, Jordano, P and Hódar, JA (2000) Geographical variation in seed production, predation and abortion in Juniperus communis throughout its range in Europe. Journal of Ecology 88: 435–446.10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00459.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gogoi, B (2015) Morpho-biochemical characterization of Garcinia species of Assam. PhD Thesis, Assam Agricutural University, Jorhat, Assam India.Google Scholar
Gopalan, C, Rama, SBV and Balasubramaniam, SC (1971) Nutritive Value of Indian Foods, 2nd edn. Hyderabad: Indian Council of Medical Research.Google Scholar
Izhaki, I, Tsahar, E, Paluy, I and Friedman, J (2002) Within population variation and interrelationships between morphology, nutritional content, and secondary compounds of Rhamnus alaternus fruits. New Phytologist 156: 217–223.10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00515.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmins, JP (1987) Forest Ecology: A Foundation for Sustainable Management, 2nd edn. New York: MacMillian Publishing Company, p. 531.Google Scholar
Leakey, R, Pate, K and Lombard, C (2005) Domestication potential of Marula (Sclerocarya birrea subsp caffra) in South Africa and Namibia: 2. Phenotypic variation in nut and kernel traits. Agroforestry System 64: 37–49.10.1007/s10457-005-2420-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, RR, Weber, JC, Page, T, Cornelius, JP, Akinnifesi, FK, Roshetko, JM, Tchoundjeu, Z and Jamnadass, R (2012) Tree domestication in agroforestry: progress in the second decade (2003–2012). In: Nair P and Garrity D (eds) Agroforestry – The Future of Global Land Use. New York: Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 145–173.10.1007/978-94-007-4676-3_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahapatra, AK and Panda, PC (2012) Wild edible fruit diversity and its significance in the livelihood of indigenous tribals: evidence from eastern India. Food Security 4: 219–234.10.1007/s12571-012-0186-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maranz, S, Kpikpi, W, Wiesman, Z, De Saint Sauveur, A and Chapagain, B (2004) Nutritional values and indigenous preferences for Shea fruits (Vitellaria paradoxa CF Gaertn. F.) in African agroforestry parklands. Economic Botany 58: 588–600.10.1663/0013-0001(2004)058[0588:NVAIPF]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mkwezalamba, I, Munthali, CRY and Missanjo, E (2015) Phenotypic variation in fruit morphology among provenances of Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst. International Journal of Forestry Research 2015: 735418.10.1155/2015/735418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munthali, CRY (2012) Physiology and genetic characterization of selected natural populations of adansoniadigitata in Malawi. PhD. thesis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.Google Scholar
Munthali, C, Chirwa, P and Akinnifesi, F (2012) Phenotypic variation in fruit and seed morphology of Adansonia digitata L. (baobab) in five selected wild populations in Malawi. Agroforestry Systems 85: 279–290.10.1007/s10457-012-9500-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narang, D, Lyngdoh, N, Bishwapati Devi, M and Hazarika, BN (2019) Characterization of fruit morphological parameters and effect of presowing treatment in Phoebe cooperiana: an economically important wild edible fruit of Arunachal Pradesh. International .Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8: 2704–2711.Google Scholar
Padmaja, G and Steinkraus, KH (1995) Cyanide detoxification in cassava for food and feed uses. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 35: 299–339.10.1080/10408399509527703CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkouda, C, Diawara, B, Lowor, S, Diako, C, Saalia, FK, Annan, NT, Jensen, JS, Tano-Debrah, K and Jakobsen, M (2011) Volatile compounds of maari, a fermented product from baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) seeds. African Journal of Biotechnology 1020: 4197–4206.Google Scholar
Payum, T, Das, AK, Ramashankar, R, Tamuly, C and Hazarika, M (2013) Ethnobotany and antioxidant determination of Phoebe cooperiana fruit – a highly utilized wild fruit in Arunachal Pradesh, India. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 4: 3196–3201.Google Scholar
Piluzza, G and Bullitta, S (2011) Correlations between phenolic content and antioxidant properties in twenty-four plant species of traditional ethnoveterinary use in the Mediterranean area. Pharmaceutical Biology 49: 240–247, doi: 10.3109/13880209.2010.501083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ram, S, Khan, MH and Singh, RP (2017) Assessment of some biochemical characters of four mango varieties (Mangifera indica L.) at different stages of fruit maturity. Chemical Science Review and Letters 6: 595–599.Google Scholar
Rawat, K, Nirmala, C and Bisht, MS (2015) Processing techniques for reduction of cyanogenic glycosides from bamboo shoots. In: Proceedings of 10th World Bamboo Congress, theme: Food and Pharmaceuticals, September 17–22, Damyang, Korea, pp 1–12.Google Scholar
Sardeshpande, M and Shackleton, C (2019) Wild edible fruits: a systematic review of an under researched multifunctional NTFP (non-timber forest product). Forests 10: 467.10.3390/f10060467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seal, T (2011) Nutritional composition of wild edible fruits in Meghalaya state of India and their Ethno-botanical importance. Research Journal of Botany 6: 58–67.Google Scholar
Seal, T, Pillai, B and Chaudhuri, K (2014) Nutritional potential of wild edible fruits, traditionally used by the local people of Meghalaya state in India. Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources 5: 359–364.Google Scholar
Sundriyal, M and Sundriyal, RC (2001) Wild edible plants of the Sikkim Himalaya: nutritive values of selected species. Economic Botany 55: 377–390.10.1007/BF02866561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suree, N, Surat, K and Akekachai, N (2004) Phytate and fibre content in Thai fruits commonly consumed by diabetic patients. Thailand Journal of Medical Association 87: 1444–1446.Google Scholar
Trumbo, P, Schlicker, S, Yates, AA and Poos, M (2002) Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine, The National Academies. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. Journal of American Diet Association 102: 1621–1630.10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90346-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (2011) Fresh California Avocados. Available at http://fnic.nal.usda.gov/food-composition/food-fyi/avocado.Google Scholar
Vihotogbe, R, van den Berg, RG and Sosef Marc, SM (2013) Morphological characterization of African bush mango trees (Irvingia species) in West Africa. Genetic Resource Crop Evolution 60: 1597–1614.10.1007/s10722-013-9969-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, CR and Moorthy, BR (1952) Heritable and non-heritable relationships and variability of oil content and agronomic characters in the F2 generation of soybean crosses. Agronomy Journal 44: 202–209.10.2134/agronj1952.00021962004400040010xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organisation (WHO) (2007) Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fibre, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids (Macronutrients). WHO Technical Report Series 935 Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dolley et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Dolley et al. supplementary material(File)
File 30.3 KB