Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:20:36.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DNA banks and their role in facilitating the application of genomics to plant germplasm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Nicole Rice*
Affiliation:
Australian Plant DNA Bank, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
Giovanni Cordeiro
Affiliation:
Centre for Plant Conservation Genetics, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
Mervyn Shepherd
Affiliation:
Centre for Plant Conservation Genetics, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
Peter Bundock
Affiliation:
Centre for Plant Conservation Genetics, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
Louis Bradbury
Affiliation:
Centre for Plant Conservation Genetics, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
Toni Pacey-Miller
Affiliation:
Centre for Plant Conservation Genetics, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
Agnelo Furtado
Affiliation:
Centre for Plant Conservation Genetics, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
Robert Henry
Affiliation:
Australian Plant DNA Bank, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia Centre for Plant Conservation Genetics, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Advances in genomics have provided technologies for high throughput analysis of plant genomes with potential for use in gene discovery in germplasm collections. The establishment of DNA banks facilitates this screening by making DNA from large numbers of plant accessions widely available. DNA banks require the development of appropriate policies for access and benefit sharing. Tools for automating sample and data handling are essential. Standard molecular methods for fingerprinting DNA accessions for international comparisons need to be determined. New screening technologies are required to take advantage of the emerging availability of large DNA collections. The Australian Plant DNA Bank aims to collect DNA from all Australian plant species and to sample the diversity within each species. DNA from all individuals of the species is being stored for rare species. Domesticated or economically important species from all countries are also being collected and stored. International networking of DNA banks will be a key step in linking genomics tools to global plant diversity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abedinia, M, Henry, RJ and Cripps Clark, S (1998) Distribution and phylogeny of Potamophila parviflora R.Br, a wild rice from eastern Australia. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 45: 399406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, RP (1997) Conservation of DNA: DNA banking. In: Callow, JA, Ford-Lloyd, BV and Newbury, HJ (eds) Biotechnology and Plant Genetic Resources. Conservation and Use. London: CAB International, pp. 163174Google Scholar
Aitken, K, Jackson, P, Piperidis, G and McIntyre, L (2004) QTL identified for yield components in a cross between a sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivar Q165A and a S. officinarum clone IJ76-514. In: Proceedings for the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 26 September to 1 October 2004, www.cropscience.org.au.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B (1992) Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants. An example from Compositae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, BG, Sanderson, MJ, Porter, JM, Wojciechowski, MF, Campbell, CS and Donoghue, MJ (1995) The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, LMT, Fitzgerald, TL, Henry, RJ, Jin, QS and Waters, DLE (2005 a) The gene for fragrance in rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal 3: 363370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradbury, LMT, Henry, RJ, Jin, QS, Reinke, RF and Waters, DLE (2005 b) A perfect marker for fragrance genotyping in rice. Molecular Breeding 16: 279283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brondani, RPV, Brondani, C, Tarchini, R and Grattapaglia, D (1998) Development, characterisation and mapping of microsatellite markers in Eucalyptus grandis and E. urophylla. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97: 816827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brondani, RPV, Brondani, C and Grattapaglia, D (2002) Towards a genus-wide reference linkage map for Eucalyptus based exclusively on highly informative microsatellite markers. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 267: 338347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, AHD, Brubaker, CL and Grace, JP (1997) Regeneration of germplasm samples: wild versus cultivated plant species (germplasm regeneration: developments in population genetics and their implications). Crop Science 37: 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckler, E and Holtsford, T (1996) Zea systematics: ribosomal ITS evidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 612622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bundock, PC and Henry, RJ (2004) Single nucleotide polymorphism, haplotype diversity and recombination in the Isa gene of barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 543551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, M (2005) Relationships between the families of flowering plants. In: Henry, RJ (ed.) Plant Diversity and Evolution: Genotypic and Phenotypic Variation in Higher Plants. Wallingford: CABI, pp. 723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, MW and Hills, HH (1991) Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. Taxon 40: 215220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, M and Zurawski, G (1991) Chloroplast DNA and the study of plant phylogeny. In: Soltis, P, Soltis, D and Doyle, J (eds) Molecular Systematics of Plants. New York: Chapman and Hall, pp. 113Google Scholar
Clegg, MT, Learn, GH and Golenberg, EM (1991) Molecular evolution of chloroplast DNA. In: Selander, R, Clark, A, Whittam, T (esd) Evolution at the Molecular Level. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, 135149Google Scholar
Cordeiro, GM, Eliott, F, McIntyre, L, Casu, RE and Henry, RJ (2006) Characterisation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in sugarcane ESTs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics (submitted)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, SL, Lawrence, PK, Henry, RJ, Ross, L, Price, HJ and Johnston, JS (2004) Sorghum laxiflorum and S. macrospermum, the Australian native species most closely related to cultivated S. bicolor based on ITS1 and ndhF sequence analysis of 25 Sorghum species. Plant Systematics and Evolution 249: 233246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J (2005) Microsatellite Maps for Eucalyptus globulus. Tasmania: University of TasmaniaGoogle Scholar
Furtado, A, Henry, RJ, Scott, KJ and Meech, S (2003) The promoter of the asi gene directs expression in the maternal tissue of the seed in transgenic barley. Plant Molecular Biology 52: 787799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Given, DR (1994) Principles and Practices of Plant Conservation. London: Chapman and HallGoogle Scholar
Gut, IG (2001) Automation in genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Human Mutation 17: 475492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, M, Stokoe, R, Cross, M, Scott, L, Maguire, T and Shepherd, M (2001) Isolation of microsatellite loci from spotted gum (Corymbia variegata), and cross-species amplification in Corymbia and Eucalyptus. Molecular Ecology Notes 1: 276278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kajita, T, Kamiya, K, Nakamura, K, Tachida, H, Wickneswari, R, Tsumura, Y, Yoshimaru, H and Yamazaki, T (1998) Molecular phylogeny of Dipetrocarpaceae in Southeast Asia based on nucleotide sequences of matK, trnL intron, and trnL-trnF intergenic spacer region in chloroplast DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10: 202209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, JK (1998) Conserving the world's plants. Agricultural Research 46: 49.Google Scholar
Kress, WJ, Wurdack, KJ, Zimmer, EA, Weight, LA and Janzen, DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 102: 83698374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusumi, J, Tsumura, Y, Yoshimaru, H and Tachida, H (2000) Phylogenetic relationships in Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae sensu stricto based on matK gene, chlL gene, trnL-trnF IGS region, and trnL intron sequences. American Journal of Botany 87: 14801488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, JZ, Morrell, PL and Clegg, MT (2002) The influence of linkage and inbreeding on patterns of nucleotide sequence diversity at duplicate alcohol dehydrogenase loci in wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp spontaneum). Genetics 162: 20072015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntosh, S, Pacey-Miller, T and Henry, RJ (2005) A universal protocol for identification of cereals. Journal of Cereal Science 41: 3746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundy, J, Svendsen, I and Hejgaard, J (1983) Barley alpha amylase/subtilisin inhibitor. I. Isolation and characterisation. Carlsberg Research Communications 48: 8190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacey-Miller, T and Henry, R (2003) Single-nucleotide polymorphism detection in plants using a single stranded pyrosequencing protocol with a universal biotynylated primer. Analytical Biochemistry 317: 165170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posada, D, Crandall, KA and Holmes, EC (2002) Recombination in evolutionary genomics. Annual Review of Genetics 36: 7597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powledge, F (1995) The food supply's safety net. If a global agricultural crises occurred, could the international germplasm community survive a run on its genebanks? Bioscience 45: 235243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, NF (2005) Conservation of plant genes and the role of DNA banks. In: Henry, RJ (ed.) Plant Conservation. USA: Haworth Press (in press)Google Scholar
Rossetto, M (2005) A simple molecular approach for identifying a rare Acronychia (Rutaceae) provides new insights on its multiple hybrid origins. Biological Conservation 121: 3543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossetto, M, Jakes, BR, Scott, KD and Henry, RJ (2002) Is the genus Cissus (Vitaceae) monophyletic; evidence from plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Systematic Botany 27: 522533.Google Scholar
Rossetto, M, Gross, CL, Jones, R and Hunter, J (2004 a) The impact of clonality on an endangered tree (Elaeocarpus williamsianus) in a fragmented rainforest. Biological Conservation 117: 3339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossetto, M, Jones, R and Hunter, J (2004 b) Genetic effects of rainforest fragmentation in an early successional tree (Elaeocarpus grandis). Heredity 93: 610618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, M, Araujo, PG, Paulet, F, Garsmeur, O, Dias, VM, Chen, H, Van Sluys, M-A and D'Hont, A (2003) Genomic distribution and characterization of EST-derived resistance gene analogs (RGAs) in sugarcane. Molecular and General Genetics 269: 406419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sancho, AI, Faulds, CB, Svensson, B, Bartolme, B, Williamson, G and Juge, N (2003) Cross-inhibitory activity of cereal protein inhibitors against alpha-amylases and xylanases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1650: 136144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, KD, Eggler, P, Seaton, G, Rossetto, M, Ablett, EM, Lee, LS and Henry, RJ (2000) Analysis of SSRs derived from grape ESTs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100: 723726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, M, Kasem, S, Lee, D and Henry, R (2005) Comparative mapping in Corymbia and Eucalyptus. In: Mercer, CF (ed.) Breeding for Success: Diversity in Action. Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Plant Breeding ConferenceChristchurch New Zealand, www.apbc.org.n2Google Scholar
Skerritt, JH and Appels, R (1995) New Diagnostics in Crop Sciences. Biotechnology in Agriculture Series, No. 13 Cambridge, MA: CAB InternationalGoogle Scholar
Taberlet, P, Gielly, L, Patou, G and Bouvet, J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 11051109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thamarus, K, Groom, K, Murrell, J, Byrne, M and Moran, G (2002) A genetic linkage map for Eucalyptus globulus with candidate loci for wood, fibre and floral traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 379387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li Wolfe, KH and Sharp, W-HPM (1987) Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 84: 90549058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed