Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:32:33.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Descriptors for on-farm conservation and use of Butia odorata natural populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2015

Claudete Clarice Mistura ,
Rosa Lía Barbieri ,
Caroline Marques Castro ,
Stefano Padulosi  and
Adriana Alercia
Claudete Clarice Mistura*
Affiliation:
CNPq/Embrapa Clima Temperado, BR 392, Km 78, Caixa Postal 403, CEP 96010-971, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
Rosa Lía Barbieri
Affiliation:
Embrapa Clima Temperado, BR 392, Km 78, Caixa Postal 403, CEP 96010-971, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
Caroline Marques Castro
Affiliation:
Embrapa Clima Temperado, BR 392, Km 78, Caixa Postal 403, CEP 96010-971, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
Stefano Padulosi
Affiliation:
Bioversity International, Via dei Tre Denari, 472/a 00057 Maccarese (Fiumicino), Rome, Italy
Adriana Alercia
Affiliation:
Bioversity International, Via dei Tre Denari, 472/a 00057 Maccarese (Fiumicino), Rome, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper aims to propose an international list of descriptors for Butia odorata (jelly palm), using scientific documentation methods and farmers' knowledge to allow the germplasm characterization for conservation and sustainable use. It is an attempt to promote the development of new approaches to documenting crop genetic resources using a blend of these two sources of knowledge, frequently perceived as conflicting. This long-lived and useful palm is a neglected and subutilized species, and its genetic diversity and associated knowledge are under severe erosion. A list of 11 morphological descriptors is proposed based on observations, literature review and discussions with farmers who know and use the plant. These descriptors were used to characterize 303 adult jelly palms conserved in situ. Descriptive results are presented. Only five morphological characteristics were reported by farmers as important to discriminate individual plants, indicating that farmers have simpler and more rapid ways to differentiate diversity than do the scientists based on their uses. Standard list of descriptors developed by ex situ conservationists are widely used by breeders, but they rarely reach out to farmers and other user groups, a fact that limits the full use of germplasm collections around the world. Conversely, farmer-based descriptors, which are the expression of deep knowledge of diversity and its deployment by traditional communities, are rarely considered by breeders, mainly because they are not available. In this paper, we support the idea that a blend of these two methods – in a standard format – is highly strategic to promote an effective in situ conservation-through-use approach.

Keywords

Butiácharacterizationlist of descriptorsex situin situ/on-farm conservationtraditional knowledge
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 35 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alercia, A and Mackay, M (2013) A gateway to plant genetic resources utilization. Acta Horticulturae 983: 25–30. Available at: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:317655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bioversity and The Christensen Fund(2009) Descriptors for Farmers' Knowledge of Plants. Rome/Palo Alto, CA: Bioversity International/The Christensen Fund.Google Scholar
Bioversity International and Cherla(2008) Descriptors for Cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill). Bioversity International, Rome: Cherla Project, Malaga.Google Scholar
Bioversity International(2009) Geneflow. Available at: http://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/pdfs/1351_Geneflow_2009.pdf.Google Scholar
Donazzolo, J (2012) Conservação pelo uso e domesticação da feijoa na serra gaúcha – RS. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil 312p.Google Scholar
FAO(2010) Second Report on the State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Commission on Genetic Resources and Agriculture . Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Fonseca, LX (2012) Caracterização de frutos de butiazeiro (Butia odorata Barb.Rodr.) Noblick & Lorenzi e estabilidade de seus compostos bioativos na elaboração e armazenamento de geleias. Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brazil 59p.Google Scholar
IBPGR(1977) Descriptors for the Cultivated Potato. Rome: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR).Google Scholar
IBPGR(1992) Descriptors for Coconut. Rome: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR).Google Scholar
IPGRI(1996) Descriptors for Banana (Musa spp.). Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI).Google Scholar
IPGRI, INRAA, INRAM, INRAT, FEM, PNUD(2005) Descripteurs du palmier dattier (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI); Fonds pour l'Environment Mondial (FEM); Programme des Nations Unies pour le Développement (PNUD); Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, d'Algérie, du Maroc et de Tunisie (INRAM) (INRAT).Google Scholar
Lorenzi, H, Noblick, LR, Kahn, F and Ferreira, E (2010) Flora Brasileira – Arecaceae (Palmeiras). Nova Odessa: Plantarum.Google Scholar
Osman, AMA, Reuther, W and Erickson, L (1974) Xenia and Metaxenia Studies in the Date Palm, Phoenix dactylifera L. Riverside, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Padulosi, S, Bergamini, N and Lawrence, T (eds) (2012) On farm conservation of neglected and underutilized species: trends and novel approaches to cope with climate change. In Proceedings of an International Conference, Frankfurt, 14–16 June 2011. Rome: Bioversity International.Google Scholar
PROBIDES(2001) Biología y conservación del palmar de butiá (Butia capitata) en la Reserva de Biosfera Bañados del Este. Avances de investigación. Documentos de Trabajo no. 34 . Rocha: PROBIDES.Google Scholar
Rivas, M and Barilani, A (2004) Diversidad, potencial productivo y reproductivo de los palmares de Butia capitata (Mart.) Becc. de Uruguay. Agrociencia 8: 11–20.Google Scholar
Rossato, M (2007) Recursos genéticos de palmeiras nativas do gênero Butia do Rio Grande do Sul. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brazil 136p.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E, Fachinello, JC, Barbieri, RL and Silva, JB (2010) Avaliação de populações de Butia capitata de Santa Vitória do Palmar. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 32: 736–745.Google Scholar