Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:17:22.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of multiplex PCR kits for SCoT and SRAP genotyping in plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2021

Ponsit Sathapondecha
Affiliation:
Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics Research, Division of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla90112, Thailand
Lathapol Boonsermsukchareon
Affiliation:
Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics Research, Division of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla90112, Thailand
Sukhuman Whankeaw*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Technology and Community Development, Thaksin University, Phatthalung Campus, Phatthalung93210, Thailand
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Taq polymerase system is one of the key success factors for genotyping by using semi-random marker types. Start codon targeted (SCoT) and sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) are semi-random markers that amplify more than one target at a time, like in multiplex PCR. Here, we compared the performance of five multiplex PCR kits (QIAGEN®, Thermo Scientific™, New England Biolabs, KAPA Biosystem and iNtRON Biotechnology) and Taq DNA polymerase from Vivantis as a representative common Taq polymerase. The PCR using three SCoT and three SRAP markers was performed in six plants, which were different in genome size, including three monocotyledons (rice, oil palm and onion) and three dicotyledons (holy basil, chilli pepper and eggplant). The overall results demonstrated consistent high performance of the Taq polymerase system with the multiplex PCR kit from KAPA Biosystem. Considered by plant, the multiplex PCR kit from KAPA Biosystem showed the best performance in holy basil, eggplant, oil palm and chilli pepper, whereas in rice, the Taq DNA polymerase from Vivantis generated better results than the KAPA Biosystem. In onion, multiplex PCR kit from Thermo Scientific™ showed the best performance among those tested, even if it did not perform well in the other plans. Different Taq polymerase systems might generate different band patterns, therefore using the same Taq polymerase system within one experimental dataset is recommended. The multiplex PCR kit from KAPA Biosystem is the best starting choice.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, A, Gupta, V, Haq, US, Jatav, KP, Kothari, SL and Kachhwaha, S (2019) Assessment of genetic diversity in 29 rose germplasms using SCoT marker. Journal of King Saud University-Science 31: 780788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angel, R (2002) Genetic diversity of Halodule wrightii using random amplified polymorphic DNA. Aquatic Botany 74: 165174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collard, BC and Mackill, DJ (2008) Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363: 557572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, TWJ (2002) Genome size and microsatellites: the effect of nuclear size on amplification potential. Genome 45: 212215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kapabiosystems (2017) KAPA2 G Fast Multiplex PCR Kit. Technical datasheet. KR0378_S – v2.17. Available at https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/roche/2gfmpxkb?lang=en&region=TH [Verified 22 April 2020].Google Scholar
Kumar, J and Agrawal, V (2017) Analysis of genetic diversity and population genetic structure in Simarouba glauca DC. (an important bio-energy crop) employing ISSR and SRAP markers. Industrial crops and products 100: 198207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, G and Quiros, C (2001) Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), a new marker system based on a simple PCR reaction: its application to mapping and gene tagging in Brassica. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 455461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmoud, A and Abdel-Fatah, BE (2012) Analysis of genetic diversity among sunflower genotypes using agro-morphological traits and molecular markers. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 6: 419432.Google Scholar
Poczai, P, Varga, I, Laos, M, Cseh, A, Bell, N, Valkonen, JP and Hyvönen, J (2013) Advances in plant gene-targeted and functional markers: a review. Plant Methods 9: 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-9-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayan, WA and Osman, SA (2019) Phylogenetic relationships of some Egyptian soybean cultivars (Glycine max L.) using SCoT marker and protein pattern. Bulletin of the National Research Centre 43: 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0197-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sathapondecha et al. supplementary material

Table S3

Download Sathapondecha  et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sathapondecha et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Sathapondecha  et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sathapondecha et al. supplementary material

Table S2

Download Sathapondecha  et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.7 KB