Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:33:00.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An overlooked cause of seed degradation and its implications in the efficient exploitation of plant genetic resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2011

Dionysia A. Fasoula*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, PO Box 22016, 1516Nicosia, Cyprus
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The importance of plant genetic resources for the future of agricultural production and for achieving food security necessitates the study of the factors affecting their most efficient exploitation, particularly in breeding programmes. The established negative correlation between competitive and yielding ability is emerging as an important, yet overlooked cause of seed and variety degradation. Because of this negative correlation, the low yielding, strong competing plants within the variety or the germplasm under study acquire a survival advantage over the high yielding, weak competing plants when propagated under dense stands, leading to a gradual cultivar degeneration and identity loss. Moreover, this gradual degeneration prevents selecting for the positive and novel adaptive variation that is endlessly released by the genome in response to biotic (e.g. mutating pathogens) and abiotic stresses. The application of nonstop selection on individual plants grown in the absence of competition using a novel selection equation demonstrates an effective means to counteract the negative effects and accelerate progress through selection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borlaug, NE (2008) Stem rust never sleeps. New York Times, 26 April.Google Scholar
Fasoula, DA (1990) Correlations between auto-, allo- and nil-competition and their implications in plant breeding. Euphytica 50: 5762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasoula, DA and Fasoula, VA (1997) Competitive ability and plant breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 14: 89138.Google Scholar
Fasoula, VA and Fasoula, DA (2000) Honeycomb breeding: principles and applications. Plant Breeding Reviews 18: 177250.Google Scholar
Fasoula, VA (2008) Two novel whole-plant field phenotyping equations maximize selection efficiency. In: Prohens, J and Badenes, ML (eds) Modern Variety Breeding for Present and Future Needs. Valencia: Editorial Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, pp. 361365.Google Scholar
Fasoulas, AC (2000) Building up resistance to Verticillium wilt in cotton through honeycomb breeding. In: Gillham, FM (ed.) New Frontiers in Cotton Research. Proceedings of 2nd World Cotton Research Conference, 6–12 September 1998. Athens, Greece, pp. 120124.Google Scholar
Fasoulas, AC and Fasoula, VA (1995) The honeycomb selection designs. Plant Breeding Reviews 13: 87139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gepts, P (2006) Plant genetic resources conservation and utilization: the accomplishments and future of a societal insurance policy. Crop Science 46: 22782292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyriakou, DT and Fasoulas, AC (1985) Effects of competition and selection pressure on yield response in winter rye (Secale cereale L.). Euphytica 34: 883895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeven, AC (1999) The traditional inexplicable replacement of seed and seed ware of landraces and cultivars: a review. Euphytica 110: 181191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fasoula supplementary material

Fasoula supplementary material

Download Fasoula supplementary material(File)
File 267.8 KB