Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:04:02.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An objective method of shape descriptor state establishment using elliptic Fourier analysis (EFA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2019

Renerio P. Gentallan Jr.*
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines
Nestor C. Altoveros
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines
Teresita H. Borromeo
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines
Leah E. Endonela
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines
Fiona R. Hay
Affiliation:
Department of Agroecology, Aarhus Universit, Forsøgsvej 1, 4200Slagelse, Denmark
Antonio G. Lalusin
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines
Consorcia E. Reaño
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines
Yosuke Yoshioka
Affiliation:
Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This research attempts to systematically establish shape descriptor states through elliptic Fourier analysis (EFA) using pili (Canarium ovatum Engl.) kernel as a model. Kernel images of 53 pili accessions from the National Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory (NPGRL), University of the Philippines Los Baños were acquired using VideometerLab 3. Shape features, such as roundness, compactness and elongation, were extracted from the images. Shapes outlines were characterized using elliptic Fourier coefficients calculated from SHAPE version 1.3 software. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis were used to elucidate clusters representing the shape descriptor states. The first principal component accounts for the variation in length to width ratio; whereas, the second and third principal components explain the variation in the location of the widest portion and the truncation of the apex and base of the kernel, respectively. Cluster analysis separated the different accessions into six distinct clusters at 0.04 Euclidian distance. Six descriptor states, narrowly elliptic, elliptic, widely elliptic, ovate, obovate and lance-ovate, were characterized from the shape outlines and visualized through R's shape on r package. The discrimination between clusters was validated through MANOVA and LDA with 95% correct classification. The Fourier coefficients were also able to represent the variation observed from the physical properties of shape. The method may be used in establishing shape descriptors of all plant parts of all crop species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bioversity International (2007) Guidelines for the Development of Crop Descriptor Lists. Bioversity Technical Bulletin Series. Bioversity International, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Birchfield, S (2016) Image Processing and Analysis. Cengage Learning. 718 p.Google Scholar
Cervantes, E, Martín, JJ and Saadaoui, E (2016) Updated methods for seed shape analysis. Scientifica 2016: 110. doi: 10.1155/2016/5691825.Google ScholarPubMed
Coronel, RE (2011) Important and Underutilized Edible Fruits of the Philippines, University of the Philippines Los Baños Foundation Inc. and Department of Agriculture Bureau of Agricultural Research, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.Google Scholar
Freeman, H (1974) Computer processing of line drawing images. Computing Surveys 6: 5797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentallan, RP, Altoveros, NC, Borromeo, TH, Endonela, LE, Hay, FR, Lalusin, AG, Reaño, CE and Yoshioka, Y (2019) Systematic establishment of colour descriptor states through image-based phenotyping. Plant Genetic Resources 17: 9194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwata, H and Ukai, Y (2002) SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. The Journal of Heredity 93: 384385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwata, H, Ebana, K, Uga, Y and Hayashi, T (2015) Genomic prediction of biological shape: elliptic Fourier analysis and kernel partial least squares (PLS) regression applied to grain shape prediction in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS ONE 10: e0120610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, FP and Giardina, CR (1982) Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18: 236258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeda, H, Akagi, T and Tao, R (2018) Quantitative characterization of fruit shape and its differentiation pattern in diverse persimmon (Diospyros kaki) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 228: 4148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, AJS, Grossi, JAS and Pinto, FDADC (2009) Postharvest shape characterization of calla lily flowers using digital imaging. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 57: 421428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlf, FJ (2002) NTSYSpc: Numerical Taxonomy System, Version 2.1. Setauket, New York: Exeter Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
Rohlf, FJ and Archie, JW (1984) A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Ritera culicidae). Systematic Zoology 33: 322–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayinci, B, Kara, M, Ercişli, S, Duyar, Ö and Ertürk, Y (2014) Elliptic Fourier analysis for shape distinction of Turkish hazelnut cultivars. Erwerbs-Obstbau 57: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, MG (2010) Plant morphology. In: Simpson, MG (ed.) Plant Systematics, 2nd edn. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 495497.Google Scholar
White, R, Rentice, HC and Verwist, T (1988) Automated image acquisition and morphometric description. Canadian Journal of Botany 66: 450459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wycislo, AP, Clark, JR and Karcher, DE (2008) Fruit shape analysis of Vitis using digital photography. HortScience 43: 677680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshioka, Y, Iwata, H, Ohsawa, R and Ninomiya, S (2004) Analysis of petal shape variation of Primula sieboldii by elliptic Fourier descriptors and principal component analysis. Annals of Botany 94: 657664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Gentallan et al. supplementary material

Gentallan et al. supplementary material 1

Download Gentallan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gentallan et al. supplementary material

Gentallan et al. supplementary material 2

Download Gentallan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 33.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gentallan et al. supplementary material

Gentallan et al. supplementary material 3

Download Gentallan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 30.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gentallan et al. supplementary material

Gentallan et al. supplementary material 4

Download Gentallan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 22.1 KB