Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:46:27.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential for utilization of pepper germplasm with a variable reaction to Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. to develop southern blight-resistant pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Richard L. Fery  and
Philip D. Dukes Sr
Richard L. Fery*
Affiliation:
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, US Vegetable Laboratory, 2700 Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC 29414-5334, USA
Philip D. Dukes Sr
Affiliation:
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, US Vegetable Laboratory, 2700 Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC 29414-5334, USA
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The bell-type pepper cultivar Golden California Wonder, a source of resistance to southern blight, was crossed with the susceptible cultivar Sweet Banana. The F1, F2 and backcross progenies of this cross and the parental lines were evaluated in an inoculated field study for their reactions to Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. A categorical rating system was used to rate plants for severity of wilting and severity of stem-lesion development. The plants within all three non-segregating populations (the resistant parent, the susceptible parent and the F1) displayed a range of reactions to S. rolfsii. Variable reactions to S. rolfsii among homogeneous pepper populations were expected because this phenomenon is well documented in the literature and we had observed similar responses in field trials conducted over multiple years. The high level of variation for reactions to S. rolfsii exhibited by the parental and F1 hybrid populations and the categorical system of rating individual plants placed severe limitations on the effective use of any quantitative type of analysis. Accordingly, a weighting procedure was used to correct the F2 and backcross populations based on frequencies of apparent mis-classifications in the parental and F1 populations. Examination of the comparative frequency distributions of the parental and progeny populations and examination of the weighted segregation data suggest that the southern blight resistance in ‘Golden California Wonder’ is conditioned by a single recessive gene. The level of resistance conditioned by this reputed recessive gene appears high enough to recommend it for use in pepper breeding programmes.

Keywords

Capsicum annuumdisease resistancepepperSclerotium rolfsiisouthern blight
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , December 2005 , pp. 326 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © USDA 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amato, VA (1964) The effect of calcium on the expression of resistance of peppers to Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. PhD Dissertation, Department of Plant Pathology, Texas A&M University, College Station (Dissertation Abstracts 64–10961).Google Scholar
Aycock, R (1966) Stem rot and other diseases caused by Sclerotium rolfsii or the status of Rolfs' fungus after 70 years North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin No. 174.Google Scholar
Brown, JE, Stevens, C, Osborn, MC and Bryce, HM (1989) Black plastic mulch and spunbonded polyester row cover as method of southern blight control in bell pepper. Plant Disease 73: 930–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chellemi, D (1998) Alternatives to methyl bromide in Florida tomatoes and peppers. The IPM Practitioner 20(4): 1–6.Google Scholar
De Jong, J and Honma, S (1976) Inheritance of resistance to Corynebacterium michiganense in the tomato. Journal of Heredity 67: 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, AH (1976) Field resistance in peppers to southern blight (Sclerotium rolfsii) In: Papers and Abstracts Presented at the1976 3rd National Pepper Conference, Davis, CA, 20–24 September.Google Scholar
Doolittle, SP (1953) Diseases of pepper. In: Stefferud A (ed.) Plant Diseases: The Yearbook of Agriculture 1953. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture pp. 466–469.Google Scholar
Dukes, PD and Fery, RL (1984) Southern blight ( Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc.) of pepper: identification of resistance (abstract). HortScience 19: 212Google Scholar
Fulton, H (1908) Diseases of pepper and beans Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 101.Google Scholar
Georgia Agricultural and Experiment Station (1940) Botany: resistance of pepper to southern blight Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station 52nd Annual Report, p. 51Google Scholar
Georgia Agricultural and Experiment Station (1941) Botany: resistance of pepper to southern blight; root rot of snap beans. Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station 53rd Annual Report, pp. 102–107.Google Scholar
Higgins, BB (1927) Physiology and parasitism of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Phytopathology 17: 417–448.Google Scholar
Jenkins, SF and Averre, CW (1986) Problems and progress in integrated control of southern blight of vegetables. Plant Disease 70: 614–619.Google Scholar
Minges, PA (ed.) (1972) Descriptive List of Vegetable Varieties. Washington, DC: American Seed Trade Association and St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Horticultural Science.Google Scholar
Punja, ZK (1985) The biology, ecology, and control of Sclerotium rolfsii. Annual Review of Phytopathology 23: 97–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Agriculture(2001) Atmospheric impact of agricultural use of methyl bromide. Methyl Bromide Alternatives 7: 1–2.Google Scholar