Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:18:14.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic diversity of Chinese and Swedish rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) analysed by inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2007

M. A. Chao-zhi
Affiliation:
National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P.R. China
F. U. Ting-dong*
Affiliation:
National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P.R. China
Stine Tuevesson
Affiliation:
Svalof Weibull AB, S-268 81 Svalov, Sweden
Bo Gertsson
Affiliation:
Svalof Weibull AB, S-268 81 Svalov, Sweden
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

We have compared the genetic diversity of 24 Chinese weak-winter, Swedish winter and spring Brassica napus accessions by inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs). Using cluster analysis (UPGMA) based on 125 polymorphism bands amplified with 20 primers, the 24 accessions were divided into three groups. Six Swedish winter lines and eight Chinese weak-winter lines were in group I and group II consisted of two Chinese weak-winter lines, Xiangyou15 and Bao81. The third group contained eight Swedish spring lines. Principal coordinates (PCO) analysis showed similar groupings to cluster analysis. Results from cluster analysis and PCO analysis showed very clearly that Chinese weak-winter, Swedish spring and winter accessions were distinguished from each other and Chinese weak-winter accessions in this study were genetically closer to Swedish winter accessions than to Swedish spring accessions. The Chinese weak-winter accessions had larger diversity than the Swedish spring or winter accessions. This study indicated that ISSR is a suitable and effective tool to evaluate genetic diversity among rapeseed germplasm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Charters, YM, Robertson, A, Wilkinson, MJ and Ramsey, G (1996) PCR analysis of oilseed rape cultivars (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera) using 50-anchored simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92 442447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, WY, Hubert, N and Landry, BS (1993) A simple and rapid DNA micro-extraction method for plant, animal, and insect suitable for RAPD and other PCR analysis. PCR Methods and Application 3 6970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diers, BW, McVetty, PBE and Osborn, TC (1996) Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance based on restriction fragment length polymorphism markers in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). Crop Science 36 7983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, TD (1999) Breeding and Utilization of Rapeseed Hybrid. Wuhan: Hubei Science and Technology Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Grant, I and Beversdorf, WD (1985) Heterosis and combining ability estimates in spring planted oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 27 472478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, M, Chyi, YS, Romero-Severson, J and Owen, JL (1994) Amplification of DNA markers from evolutionarily diverse genomes using single primers of simple-sequence repeats. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89 9981006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, JC and Sun, M (2000) Genetic diversity and relationships of sweetpotato and its wild relatives in Ipomoea series Batatas (Convolvulaceae) as revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and restriction analysis of chloroplast DNA. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100 10501060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailer, RJ, Scarth, R and Fristensky, B (1994) Discrimination among cultivars of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using DNA polymorphisms amplified from arbitrary primers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87 697704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meng, JL, Lydiate, D, Sharpe, A,Bowman, C, Tian, ZH, Fu, TD, Qian, XZ and Lydiate, D (1996) Analysis of genetic diversity by RFLP markers. Acta Genetica Sinica 23: 293306 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Nei, M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89 583590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plieske, J and Struss, D (2001) Microsatellite markers for genome analysis in Brassica. I. Development in Brassica napus and abundance in Brassicaceae species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102 689694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sernyk, BR and Steffanson, JL (1982) Heterosis in summer rape (Brassica napus L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63 407413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thormann, CE, Ferreira, ME, Camargo, LEA, Tivang, JG and Osborn, TC (1994) Comparison of genetic relationship estimates within and among cruciferous species based on RFLP and RAPD markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88 973980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, JF (2000) Engineering Techniques on Crop Genetics and Breeding. Zhengzhou: Henan Science and Technology Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wu, NF, Li, NG, Wu, XM, Zhu, L, Fan, YL and Qian, XZ (1997) RAPD molecular markers and genetic diversity among 40 cultivars of Brassica napus in China. Chinese Biodiversity 5: 246250 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zietkiewicz, E, Rafalski, A and Labuda, D (1994) Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20 176183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed