Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:24:01.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ecological and sanitary characteristics of the Eurasian wild grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sylvestris (Gmelin) Hegi) in Georgia (Caucasian region)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2012

Rafael Ocete Rubio
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Entomología Aplicada, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida Reina Mercedes, 6, 41012Sevilla, Spain
Elvira Ocete Rubio
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Entomología Aplicada, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida Reina Mercedes, 6, 41012Sevilla, Spain
Carlos Ocete Pérez
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Entomología Aplicada, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida Reina Mercedes, 6, 41012Sevilla, Spain
M. Ángeles Pérez Izquierdo
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Entomología Aplicada, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida Reina Mercedes, 6, 41012Sevilla, Spain
Laura Rustioni
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Production, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133Milan, Italy
Osvaldo Failla
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Production, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133Milan, Italy
Ramaz Chipashvili
Affiliation:
Institute of Horticulture, Viticulture and Oenology (IHVO), 6 Marshal Gelovani Ave. 0159, Tbilisi, Georgia
David Maghradze*
Affiliation:
Institute of Horticulture, Viticulture and Oenology (IHVO), 6 Marshal Gelovani Ave. 0159, Tbilisi, Georgia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper shows the results of the investigation on some ecological aspects and on the sanitary status of the wild Euroasiatic native grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sylvestris (Gmelin) Hegi) in Georgia (South Caucasus). This taxon is seriously endangered by human activities such as forest cleaning and setting fires. Moreover, invasive Vitaceae of the North American origin, imported after phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) when vineyards were being replanted, increase the risk to lose these spontaneous vines. The survey includes collection of data on the population structure, the plant sex ratio, the main botanical supporters of the vines and the associated flora, the presence of invasive vines of the North American origin and the incidence of phytophagous arthropods and pathogens. The phytosanitary study showed that monophagous eriophyid mites and exotic fungal diseases, such as downy (Plasmopara viticola (Berkeley and Curtis) Berlease and de Toni) and powdery mildews (Erysiphe necator –(Schweinitz) Burrill), cause symptoms on all the observed populations. The absence of symptoms caused by phylloxera, root-knot nematodes and root rot is remarkable. However, the level of detected injuries caused by these parasitic organisms does not seem to be a real problem for the survival of the populations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ampelography (1970) Varieties with female type of flower. In: Negrul AM (Editor of Chief) Reference Book of the Ampelography of the Soviet Union in Ten Volumes. Moscow: Pishchevaia promishlennost, pp. 406408 (In Russian).Google Scholar
Arnaud, G and Arnaud, M (1931) Traité de pathologie végétale. In: Lechevalier, P and Fils, (eds) Traité de pathologie végétale. Paris: Tomo I.Google Scholar
Arnold, C, Gillet, F and Gobat, JM (1998) Situatuin de la vigne sauvage, Vitis vinifera ssp. silvetris en Europe. Vitis 37 (4): 159170.Google Scholar
Arnold, C (2002) Ecologie de la vigne sauvage, Vitis vinifera L. ssp sylvestris (Gmelin) Hegi, dans les forêts alluviales et colluviales d'Europe. PhD Thesis, University of Neuchâtel..Google Scholar
Arrigo, N and Arnold, C (2007) Naturalised Vitis rootstocks in Europe and consequences to native wild grapevine. PLoS One 2: e521. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000521.Google Scholar
Arroyo-García, R, Ruiz-Garcia, L, Bolling, L, Ocete, R, Lopez, MA, Arnold, C, Ergul, A, Söylemezoglu, G, Uzun, HI, Cabello, F, Ibañez, J, Aradhya, MK, Atanassov, A, Atanassov, I, Balint, S, Cenis, JL, Costantini, L, Gorislavets, S, Grando, MS, Klein, BY, McGovern, PE, Merdinoglu, D, Pejic, I, Pelsy, F, Primikirios, N, Risovannaya, V, Roubelakis-Angelakis, KA, Snoussi, H, Sotiri, P, Tamhankar, S, This, P, Troshin, L, Malpica, JM, Lefort, F and Martinez-Zapater, JM (2006) Multiple origins of cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sativa) based on chloroplast DNA polymorphisms. Molecular Ecology 15: 37073714.Google Scholar
Baggiolini, M (1952) Les stades rèperes dans le dèveloppement annuale de la vigne et leur utilisation pratique. Revue Romande d'Agriculture, Viticulture et d'Arboriculture 8: 46.Google Scholar
Berkeley, J (1847) Sur une nouvelle espéce d'oidium, O. tuckery, parasite de la vigne. Gardener's Chronicle 27 de noviembre.Google Scholar
Bernard, M, Horne, P and Hoffmann, A (2005) Eriophyoid mite damage in Vitis vinifera (grapevine) in Australia: Calepitrimerus vitis and Colomerus vitis (Acari: Eriophyidae) as the common cause of the widespread ‘Restricted Spring Growth’ syndrome. Experimental and Applied Acarology 35: 83109.Google Scholar
Biagini, B (2011) La vite selvatica in Italia. In: Biagini, B (ed.) Proceeding of the International Conference “Origini Della Viticoltura: Dalla Vite Selvatica Alle Varietà Coltivate”, 25 June 2010, Castiglone d'Orcia, Italy , pp. 183203.Google Scholar
Carew, ME, Goodisamn, MAD and Hoffmann, AA (2004) Species status and population structure of grapevine eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidae). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 111: 8796.Google Scholar
Cholokashvili, N (1983) Genus Vitis L. In: Flora of Georgia. vol. 8 2nd edn. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, pp. 274278 (in Georgian).Google Scholar
Cortés, B (1854) Salvación de las viñas ó historia del oidium-tuckeri. Imp. De Manuel Minuesa, 1854.Google Scholar
De Candolle, A (1883) Origine des plantes cultivées. Paris: Baillière.Google Scholar
Dennil, GB (1986) An ecological basis for timing control measures against the grape vine bud mite Eriophyes vitis PGst. Crop Protecion 5: 1214.Google Scholar
Flora Georgia (1971–2007) Flora of Georgia. In: Ketskhoveli N and Gagnidze R (Editors of chief) 15 Volumes, 2nd edn. Tbilisi: Mecniereba (in Georgian).Google Scholar
Ferragut, F, Gallardo, A, Ocete, R and López, MA (2008) Natural predatory enemies of the Erineum strain of Colomerus vitis (Pagenstecher) (Acari, Eriophyidae) found on wild grapevine populations from southern Spain (Andalusia). Vitis 47: 5154.Google Scholar
Grossgeim AA (1939, 1940, 1945, 1950, 1952, 1962, 1967) Flora of the Caucasus in 7 Volumes, 2nd edn. Baku and Moscow-Leningrad (in Russian).Google Scholar
Imazio, S, Maghradze, D, Bacilier, R, De Lorenzis, G, Scienza, A, This, P and Failla, O (2010) Molecular survey of Georgian traditional grapevine genetic resources. In: Book of Abstracts for the 10th International Conference on Grape Genetics and breeding, 1–5 August 2010, Geneva, USA . pp. 70.Google Scholar
Kantaria, V and Ramishvili, M (1983) Viticulture. Tbilisi (In Georgian): Ganatleba.Google Scholar
Keifer, HH, Baker, EW, Kono, T, Delfinado, M and Styer, WE (1982) An illustrated guide to plant abnormalities caused by Eriophyd mites in North America. In: US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 573. 178 pp.Google Scholar
Laguna, E (2003 a) Sobre las formas naturalizadas de Vitis en la Comunidad Valenciana. I. Las especies. Flora Montibérica 23: 4682.Google Scholar
Laguna, E (2003 b) Datos sobre la producción de frutos de las especies e híbridos invasores de vides (Vitis L.). Toll Negre 2: 1015.Google Scholar
Lara, M and Ocete Rubio, R (1992) Erinosis, una constante de las poblaciones españolas de Vitis vinifera silvestris (Gmelin) Hegi. Viticultura Enología Profesional 29: 1116.Google Scholar
Larrea, A (1978) Vides americanas portainjertos. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura.Google Scholar
Law (1998) Law of Georgia about Grapevine and Wine. Tbilisi (In Georgian).Google Scholar
Le Canu, RL (1862) Instrucción popular para el azufrado de las vides. Madrid: Imprenta de Manuel Alvarez.Google Scholar
Leroux, P and Clerjeau, M (1985) Resistance of Botrytis cinerea Pers. and Plasmopara viticola (Berk. and Curt.) Berl. and de Toni to fungicides in French vineyards. Crop Protection 4: 137160.Google Scholar
Lomineishvili, R and Gaprindashvili, G (1990) Sakara testing station after 100 years of its establishment. In: Proceedings of the Georgian Research Institute of Horticulture, Viticulture and Oenology. Special Issue ‘Sakara Testing Station is 100 Years Old’, Tbilisi , pp. 340 (In Georgian).Google Scholar
Maghradze, D, Ocete Rubio, ME, Pérez Izquierdo, MA, Chipashvili, R, Osete Pérez, CA and Ocete Rubio, R (2010) El patrimonio vitícola de Georgia: el estado sanitario de sus poblaciones silvestres. In: Materials of the Congress “XXXI Jornadas de Viticultura y Enologia de Tierra de Barros”, 4–8 Mayo 2009, Badajoz . Almendralejo: Centro Universitario Santa Ana de Almendralejo, pp. 113126.Google Scholar
Maghradze, D, Failla, O, Imazio, R, Bacilieri, R, Chipashvili, R, Quattrini, E, This, P and Scienza, A (2011) Wild grapevine of Georgia. In: Proceeding of the International Conference “Origini della viticoltura: dalla vite selvatica alle varietà coltivate”, 25 June 2010, Castiglone d'Orcia, Italy , pp. 183203.Google Scholar
Makashvili, A (1991) Lexicum botanicum–Nomina plantarum. 3rd edn. Tbilis (In Georgian, Russian, Latin): Metsniereba.Google Scholar
Millardet, A (1885) Historie des principales varietés et espèces de vignes d'origine américaine qui résistent au Phylloxera. Paris/Bordeaux: Masson/Feret.Google Scholar
Moore, D (1982) Green planet. In: The Story of Plant Life on Earth. Cambridge/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, JTV (1882) Guía teórico-práctica para combatir las enfermedades de la vid. Madrid: Biblioteca Agrícola Ilustrada.Google Scholar
Myles, S, Boyko, AR, Owense, CL, Browna, PJ, Grassi, F, Aradhya, MK, Prins, B, Reynolds, A, Chia, J-M, Ware, D, Bustamante, CD and Buckler, ES (2011) Genetic structure and domestication history of the grape. In: PNAS (Proceedings of Academy of Science, USA). Early edn. Available at www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1009363108, p. 6.Google Scholar
Negrul, AM (1952) Viticulture with Basic Ampelography and Breeding. Moscow (In Russian): Agricultural Literature, p. 427.Google Scholar
Ocete, R, Gallardo, A, Lara, M, López, MA and Pérez, MA (2006) Una perspectiva histórica sobre la crisis filoxérica y su impacto en el viñedo andaluz. Sevilla: Instituto de Investigación y Formación Agraria y Pesquera, Consejería de Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa, Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca, Junta de Andalucía, pp. 187.Google Scholar
Ocete, R, Cantos, M, López, MA, Gallardo, A, Pérez, MA, Troncoso, A, Lara, M, Failla, O, Ferragut, FJ and Liñán, J (2007) Caracterización y conservación del recurso fitogenético vid silvestre en Andalucía. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla .Google Scholar
Ocete, R, López, MA, Gallardo, A and Arnold, C (2008) Comparative analysis of wild and cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera) in the Basque Region of Spain and France. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 123: 9598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocete, R, Arnold, C, Failla, O, Lovicu, G, Biagini, B, Imazio, S, Lara, M, Maghradze, D and Angeles-Lopes, M (2011) Considaration on European wild grapevine (Vitis vinifera L., ssp. sylvestris (Gmelin) Hegi) and Phylloxera infestation. Vitis 50: 9798.Google Scholar
OIV (2009) Descriptor List for Grape Varieties and Vitis Species, 2nd edn. Paris: The OIV, 179 pp.Google Scholar
Palm, CE and Walter, WD (1991) Control of Plant-parasitic Nematodes. vol. 4. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, pp. 219.Google Scholar
Pearson, RC and Goheen, AC (1996) Plagas y enfermedades de la vid. Mundi-Prensa: The American Phytopathological Society, pp. 91.Google Scholar
Pérez de Obanos, J (1992) Plagas en viñedos: acariosis y erinosis. Navarra agraria, No. 12. Pamplona: ITGC.Google Scholar
Ramishvili, R (1988) Wildly Growing Grapevine of the Trans-Caucasus. Tbilisi, p. 124 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Ramishvili, R (2001) History of Georgian Grape and Wine. Tbilisi, p. 240 (in Georgian).Google Scholar
Raski, DJ (1994) Nematodos parásitos de la vid. In: Pearson, RC and Goheen, AC (eds) Plagas y enfermedades de la vid. Mundi-Prensa: The American Phytopathological Society, pp. 5556.Google Scholar
Red Book of Georgia(1982) Krikina, Forest grape, Usurvazi, Vitis silvesrtis Gmel. In: Kacharava W (Editor of Chief). Rare and Endangered Species of Animals and Plants. Tbilisi: Sabchota Sakartvelo, pp. 155–156 (in Georgian).Google Scholar
Reyes, J (2004) ERINOSIS (Eriophyes vitis Pgst. Sin Colomerus vitis Pgst.) En Los parasitos de la vid: Estrategias de Protección Razonada. Madrid: Mundi-Prensa & MAPA.Google Scholar
Saint Pierre, C (1876) Les ravegours des verges et des vignes. In. De La Branchére, H. Paris. J. Rothschild (ed.) pp 67.Google Scholar
Sazo Rodríguez, L, Agurto, L, Contador, F and Mondaca, AC (2003) Nuevas especies de Acaros fitófagos asociados a la vid vinífera en Chile . Available at http://www.gie.uchile.cl/pdf/Luis%20Sazo/acaros.pdf.Google Scholar
Terpó, A (1969) A Vitis silvestris Magyar Középhegységi termöhelyi Viszonyainak visgàlata. Budapest. Botanikai Közlemények 56: 2735.Google Scholar
Terpó, A (1974) A ligeti szóló- Vitis vinifera L. (Taxonomic key of the wild and feral vine species occurring in Hungary). Budapest. Magyarország Kultúrflórája 4: 1516.Google Scholar
Urien de Vera, E and Diego-Madrazo, C (1891) Las enfermedades de la vid. Salamanca: Imp. de Fco. Núñez Izquierdo.Google Scholar
Vavilov, NI (1926) Cemtry proiskhozhdenia kulturnikh rastenii (The centres of origin for cultivated plants). Trudi po prikladnoi botanike, genetike i selektsii (Proceedings of Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding) 16: 133137 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ocete Rubio supplementary material

Ocete Rubio supplementary material

Download Ocete Rubio supplementary material(File)
File 73.2 KB