Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:16:42.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development and characterization of Triticum aestivumAegilops kotschyi amphiploids with high grain iron and zinc contents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Nidhi Rawat
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India
Vijay K. Tiwari
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India
Kumari Neelam
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India
Gursharn S. Randhawa
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India
Parveen Chhuneja
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India
Kuldeep Singh
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India
Harcharan S. Dhaliwal*
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Abstract

Synthetic amphiploids between Triticum aestivum (AABBDD) landrace Chinese Spring (PhI) and cultivar WL711 with different accessions of Aegilops kotschyi (UUSlSl) were developed through colchicine treatment of sterile hybrids. The F1 hybrids and amphiploid plants were intermediate between the parents for plant morphology and spike characteristics. Meiotic metaphase chromosome analysis of the F1 hybrids (ABDUSl) showed the expected chromosome number (35) and very little but variable homoeologous chromosome pairing. The amphiploids (AABBDDUUSlSl), however, had variable frequency of univalents at meiotic metaphase-I. The SDS–PAGE of high molecular weight glutenin subunits of amphiploids along with the parents showed the presence and expression of all the parental genomes in the amphiploids. The amphiploids with seeds as large as that of wheat cultivars had higher grain, flag leaf and grain ash iron and zinc concentrations than the wheat parents and comparable with those of their Ae. kotschyi parents suggest that Ae. kotschyi possesses a distinctive genetic system for the micronutrient uptake, translocation and sequestration than the wheat cultivars. This could, however, be demonstrated unequivocally only with comprehensive data on biomass, grain yield and harvest index of the Aegilops donors and the synthetic amphiploids, which is not feasible due to their shattering and hard threshing. The use of amphiploids for the transfer of high iron and zinc concentrations and development of alien addition and substitution lines in wheat is in progress.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghaee-Sarbarzeh, M, Ferrahi, M, Singh, S, Singh, H, Friebe, B, Gill, BS and Dhaliwal, HS (2002) Ph I induced transfer of leaf and stripe rust resistance genes from Aegilops triuncialis and Ae. geniculata to bread wheat. Euphytica 127: 377382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cakmak, I, Ozkan, H, Braun, HJ, Welch, RM and Romheld, V (2000) Zinc and iron concentrations in seeds of wild, primitive, and modern wheats. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 21(4): 401403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderini, DF and Ortiz-Monasterio, I (2003a) Grain position affects grain macronutrient and micronutrient concentrations in wheat. Crop Science 43: 141151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderini, DF and Ortiz-Monasterio, I (2003b) Are synthetic hexaploids a means of increasing grain element concentrations in wheat? Euphytica 134: 169178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q, Tsujimoto, H and Gill, BS (1994) Transfer of Ph I gene promoting homoeologous pairing from Triticum speltoides into common wheat and their utilization in alien genetic introgression. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88: 97101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhuneja, P, Dhaliwal, HS, Bains, NS and Singh, K (2006) Aegilops kotschyi and Ae. tauschii as a source for higher levels of grain iron and zinc. Plant Breeding 125: 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhuneja, P, Kaur, S, Garg, T, Ghai, M, Kaur, S, Prashar, M, Bains, NS, Goel, RK, Keller, B, Dhaliwal, HS and Singh, K (2008) Mapping of adult plant stripe rust resistance genes in diploid A genome wheat species and their transfer to bread wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 116: 313324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damania, AB (1993) Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dubcovsky, J and Dvorak, J (2007) Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316(5833): 18621866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dvörak, J (1977) Transfer of leaf rust resistance from Aegilops speltoides to Triticum aestivum. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 19: 133141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, TR and Gill, BS (1996) The deletion stocks of common wheat. Journal of Heredity 87: 295307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M, Liu, B, Segal, G, Abbo, S, Levy, AA and Vega, JM (1997) Rapid elimination of low-copy DNA sequences in polyploid wheat: A possible mechanism for differentiation of homoeologous chromosomes. Genetics 147: 13811387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friebe, B, Jiang, J, Raupp, WJ, McIntosh, RA and Gill, BS (1996) Characterization of wheat-alien translocations conferring resistance to diseases and pests: current status. Euphytica 91: 5987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauhar, PP (2007) Meiotic restitution in wheat polyhaploids (Amphiploids): A potent evolutionary force. Journal of Heredity 98: 188193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J, Friebe, B and Gill, BS (1994) Recent advances in alien gene transfer in wheat. Euphytica 73: 199212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kihara, H (1944) Discovery of the DD-analyser, one of the ancestors of Triticum vulgare (Japanese). Agriculture and Horticulture 19: 1314.Google Scholar
Kuraparthy, V, Chhuneja, P, Dhaliwal, HS, Kaur, S, Bowden, RL and Gill, BS (2007) Characterization and mapping of cryptic alien introgression from Aegilops geniculata with new leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes Lr 57 and Lr 40 in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 114: 13791389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W and Gill, BS (2006) Multiple genetic pathways for seed shattering in the grasses. Functional and Integrative Genomics 6: 300309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, A and Sanchez-Monge Laguna, E (1982) Cytology and morphology of the Amphiploid Hordeum chilense × Triticum turgidum. Euphytica 31: 261267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsouka, Y and Nasuda, S (2004) Durum wheat as a candidate for the unknown female progenitor of bread wheat: an empirical study with a highly fertile F 1 hybrid with Aegilops tauschii crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109(8): 17101717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, GK, Genc, Y and Graham, RD (2008) A simple method to evaluate grain zinc concentration by correcting for differences in grain yield. Plant and Soil 306: 4955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, ES and Sears, ER (1946) The origin of Triticum spelta and its free threshing hexaploid relatives. Journal of Heredity 37: 8189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mello-Sampayo, T (1973) Somatic association of telocentric chromosomes carrying homologous centromeres in common wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 43: 174181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, RE, Cai, X, Xu, SS, Chen, X and Stack, RW (2005) Wheat-alien species derivatives: a novel source of resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat. Crop Science 45: 13531360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz-Monasterio, I and Graham, RD (2000) Breeding for trace minerals in wheat. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 21: 392396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawat, N, Tiwari, VK, Singh, N, Randhawa, GS, Singh, K, Chhuneja, P and Dhaliwal, HS (2009) Evaluation and utilization of Aegilops and wild Triticum species for enhancing iron and zinc content in wheat. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 5364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, R and Chapman, V (1958) Genetic control of the cytologically diploid behaviour of hexaploid wheat. Nature 182: 713715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, ER (1954) The aneuploids of common wheat. Missouri Agriculture Experiment Station Research Bulletin 572: 158.Google Scholar
Sears, ER (1976) Genetic control of chromosome pairing in wheat. Annual Review of Genetics 10: 3151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, HC, Aylward, SG and Gill, BS (1987) Partial amphiploid from Triticum aestivum × Agropyron scirpeum Cross. Botanical Gazette 148(2): 258262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, WDJ and Payne, JW (1984) Characteristics of the active transport of peptides and amino acids by germinating barley embryos. Planta 162: 159165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sourdille, P, Cadalen, T, Gay, G, Gill, BS and Bernard, M (2002) Molecular and physical mapping of genes affecting awning in wheat. Plant Breeding 121: 320324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwari, VK, Rawat, N, Neelam, K, Randhawa, GS, Singh, K, Chhuneja, P and Dhaliwal, HS (2008) Development of Triticum turgidum subsp durumAegilops longissima amphiploids with high iron and zinc content through unreduced gamete formation in F 1 hybrids. Genome 51(9): 757766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, PJ and Broadley, MR (2005) Biofortifying crops with essential mineral elements. Trends in Plant Science 10(12): 586593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organisation (2002) World Health Report-2002. Available at http://www.who.int/whr/2002/. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
Zarcinas, BA, Cartwright, B and Spencer, LR (1987) Nitric acid digestion and multielemental analysis of plant material by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 18: 131146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, MB and Hurrel, RF (2007) Nutritional iron deficiency. The Lancet 370: 511519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar