Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:26:51.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of genetic diversity and structure in a genebank collection of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) using SSR markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2016

Mamta Gupta ,
Vikas Sharma ,
Sunil K. Singh ,
Rakesh K. Chahota  and
Tilak R. Sharma
Mamta Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University Palapmur-176 062, India National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi-110012, India
Vikas Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University Palapmur-176 062, India Department of Botany, Punjabi University Patiala, Punjab-147002, India
Sunil K. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University Palapmur-176 062, India National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi-110012, India
Rakesh K. Chahota
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University Palapmur-176 062, India
Tilak R. Sharma*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University Palapmur-176 062, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Genetic diversity of a red clover global collection was assessed using 36 simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers representing all seven linkage groups (LGs). The number of fragments amplified ranged from 1 to 6 for all the primers. Primer RCS0060 detected highest number of fragments, whereas four SSRs viz., RCS0899, RCS1594, TPSSR40 and RCS6927 amplified single fragment. Size range of amplicons generated by all the primers varied from 100 to 400 bp. Polymorphism information content values ranged from 0.301 to 0.719 with an average value of 0.605. LG wise diversity analysis showed that LG 3 was most diverse (I = 0.65, Ht = 0.44), whereas LG-1 showed minimum diversity (I = 0.48, Ht = 0.26) for the microsatellites used. Bayesian model-based clustering inferred three genetically distinct populations in the red clover germplasm holding and showed considerable admixture in individuals within clusters. Neighbour-joining analysis showed intermixing of accessions within groups. Principal component analysis plot complemented the clustering shown by Structure and distinguished three populations to greater extent. Analysis of molecular variance showed that 91% of the genetic variation was residing within populations, while 9% variation was among populations. Overall, the results showed that a high level of genetic diversity is prevailing in this worldwide collection of red clover, which can be exploited for its genetic improvement through breeding approaches.

Keywords

AMOVAgenetic diversitypolymorphismpopulation structurered cloverSSRTrifolium pratense
Type
Short Communication
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 376 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asci, OO (2011) Biodiversity in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) collected from Turkey. I: Morpho-agronomic properties. African Journal of Biotechnology 10: 14073–14079.Google Scholar
Botstein, D, White, RL, Skolnick, M and Davis, RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics 32: 314–331.Google ScholarPubMed
Bowley, SR, Taylor, NL and Dougherty, T (1984) Physiology and morphology of red clover. Advances in Agronomy 37: 317–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, PMB, Julier, B, Sampoux, JP, Barre, P and Agnol, MD (2008a) Genetic diversity in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) revealed by morphological and microsatellite (SSR) markers. Euphytica 160: 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, PMB, Pretz, VF, Agnol, MD, Schifino-Wittmann, MT and Zuanazzi, JA (2008b) Analysis of genetic diversity in the core collection of red clover (Trifolium pratense) with isozyme and RAPD markers. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 8: 202–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, JJ and Doyle, JL (1990) A rapid total DNA preparation procedure for fresh plant tissue. Focus 12: 13–15.Google Scholar
Earl, DA and vonHoldt, BM (2011) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4: 359–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, J, Charlton, JFL and Laidlaw, AS (1998) Temperate Forage Legumes. Wallingford: CAB International, p 192.Google Scholar
Greene, SL, Gritsenko, M and Vandemark, G (2004) Relating morphologic and RAPD marker variation to collection site environment in wild populations of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51: 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grlju, S, Bolari, S, Popovi, S, Upi, T, Tucak, M and Kozumplik, V (2008) Comparison of morphological and RAPD markers in evaluation of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) changes caused by natural selection. Periodicum Biologorum 110: 237–242.Google Scholar
Kölliker, R, Herrmann, D, Boller, B and Widmer, F (2003) Swiss Mattenklee landraces, a distinct and diverse genetic resource of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 306–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kongkiatngam, P, Waterway, MJ, Fortin, MG and Coulman, BE (1995) Genetic variation within and between two cultivars of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.): comparisons of morphological, isozyme, and RAPD markers. Euphytica 84: 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouamé, CN and Quesenberry, KH (1993) Cluster analysis of a world collection of red clover germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 40: 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosjidis, JA and Klingler, KA (2006) Genetic diversity in the core subset of the U.S. red clover germplasm. Crop Science 46: 758–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolic, Z, Vasiljevic, S, Karagic, D, Vujakovic, M, Jovicic, D, Katic, S and Momirovic, GS (2010) Genetic diversity of red clover cultivars (Trifolium pratense L.) based on protein polymorphism. Genetica 42: 249–258.Google Scholar
Paplauskienė, V, Dabkevičienė, G (2008) Genetic variability determination using ISSR–PCR markers in red clover varieties. Biologia 54: 56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peakall, R and Smouse, PE (2006) GENALEX 6.4: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrier, X, Jacquemoud-Collet, JP (2006) DARwin software http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin Google Scholar
Pritchard, JK, Stephens, M and Donnelly, P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosso, BS, Pagano, EM (2005) Evaluation of introduced and naturalised populations of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) at Pergamino EEA-INTA, Argentina. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 507–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, S, Isobe, S, Asamizu, E, Ohmido, N, Kataoka, R, Nakamura, Y, Kaneko, T, Sakurai, N, Okumura, K, Klimenko, I, Sasamoto, S, Wada, T, Watanabe, A, Kohara, M, Fujishiro, T and Tabata, S (2005) Comprehensive structural analysis of the genome of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). DNA Research 12: 301–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, V, Bhardwaj, P, Kumar, R, Sharma, RK, Sood, A and Ahuja, PS (2009) Identification and cross-species amplification of EST derived SSR markers in different bamboo species. Conservation Genetics 10: 721–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, V, Sharma, TR, Rana, JC and Chahota, RK (2015) Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure in Horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) using RAPD and ISSR markers. Agricultural Research 4: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RR, Taylor, NL and Bowley, SR (1985) Red clover. In: Taylor, NL (ed.) Clover Science and Technology. Madison, WI: ASA Special Publication 25, pp. 471–490.Google Scholar
Yeh, FC and Boyle, TJB (1997) Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belgian Journal of Botany 129: 157.Google Scholar
Zhang, DX and Hewitt, GM (2003) Nuclear DNA analyses in genetic studies of populations: practice, problems and prospects. Molecular Ecology 12: 563–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Gupta supplementary material

Tables S1-S5 and Figure S1

Download Gupta supplementary material(File)
File 250.9 KB