Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:12:08.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vowel harmony in Khalkha Mongolian, Yaka, Finnish and Hungarian*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

John Goldsmith
John Goldsmith
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The discussion of vowel harmony in this paper continues the theoretical discussion that was sparked by Clements' first proposals concerning an autosegmental treatment of vowel harmony in general (1980 [1976]). I will attempt to show that problems that arose in early autosegmental treatments of certain types of vowel harmony can be elegantly overcome and that autosegmental theory more generally provides an attractive framework for the treatment of vowel systems and vowel harmony. I will discuss three distinct types of systems here: the slightly asymmetrical system of Khalkha Mongolian, the canonical five-vowel system as it can be seen in Bantu (Yaka, in this case), and the well-known Finnish/Hungarian type of system. The kinds of advances made here answer, I believe, the critical comments made in Anderson (1980), in which significant sceptical questions are raised concerning whether the successes of autosegmental accounts of West African systems can be extended to other types of vowel harmony systems.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , May 1985 , pp. 253 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, , John, M. & Charles, Jones (1974). Three theses concerning phonological representations. JL 10. 1–26.Google Scholar
Anderson, , Lloyd, (1975). Phonetic and psychological explanations for vowel harmony, especially in Finnish. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Anderson, , Stephen, R. (1980). Problems and perspectives in the description of vowel harmony. In Vago (1980a). 1–48.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. (1984). Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Chinchor, , Nancy, (1979). On the treatment of Mongolian vowel harmony. Cunyforum Papers in Linguistics 8. 171–186.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1977). The autosegmental treatment of vowel harmony. In Dressier, W. U. & Pfeiffer, O. E. (eds.) Phonologica 1976. Innsbruck: lnnsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft. 111–119.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1980) [1976]. Vowel harmony in nonlinear generative phonology. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1981). Akan vowel harmony: a nonlinear analysis. Harvard Studies in Phonology 2. 108–177.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1984). Vowel harmony in Akan: a consideration of Stewart's word structure conditions. Studies in African Linguistics 15. 321–337.Google Scholar
Djamouri, , Redouane, & Annie, Rialland (1983). Harmonie vocalique, consonantique et structures de dépendance dans le mot en mongol Khalkha. Ms, CNRS.Google Scholar
Donegan, , Patricia, (1978). On the natural phonology of vowels. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Eynde, , Karl, van den (1968). Eléments de grammaire yaka. Kinshasa: Université Lovanium.Google Scholar
Georges-Pichot, J. P. (ms). L'harmonie vocalique du finnois.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, , John, (1981). Subsegmentals in Spanish phonology: an autosegmental approach. In Cressey, W. W. & Napoli, D. J. (eds.) Linguistic symposium on Romance languages 9. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 1–16.Google Scholar
Hall, , Beatrice, L., Hall, R. M. R., Martin, D. Pam, Amy, Myers, Stephen, A. Antell & Godfrey, K. Cherono (1974). African vowel harmony systems from the vantage point of Kalenjin. Afrika und Übersee 57. 241–267.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & J.-R., Vergnaud (1981). Harmony processes. In Klein, W. & Levelt, W. (eds.) Crossing the boundaries in linguistics. Dordrecht: Reidel. 1–22.Google Scholar
Hulst, , Harry, van der (1985). Vowel harmony in Hungarian: a comparison of segmental and autosegmental analyses. In Harry, van der Hulst & Norval, Smith (eds.) Advances in non-linear phonology. Dordrecht: Foris 267–303.Google Scholar
Karlsson, , Fred, (1974). Centrala problem i finskans bojningsmorfologi, morfofonematik och fonologi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjailisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, , Michael, (1979). Chukchee vowel harmony and epenthesis. In Paul, Clyne, William, F. Hanks & Carol, Hofbauer (eds.) The elements: parasession on linguistic units and levels, Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1967). How abstract is phonology? Indiana University Linguistics Club. Reprinted in Fujimura, O. (ed.) (1973). Three dimensions of linguistic theory. Tokyo: TEC. 5–56.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, , Paul, (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Yang, I.-S. (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Lass, , Roger, (1984). Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levergood, , Barbara, (1983). Rule governed vowel harmony and the Strict Cycle. NELS 14. 275–293.Google Scholar
Mascaró, , Joan, (1976). Catalan phonology and the phonological cycle. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (ed.) (1970). Prosodic analysis. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, D. (1983). Tone in Lexical Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT To be published. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Rennison, , John, R. (1984). On tridirectional feature systems for vowels. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 33–34. 69–94.Google Scholar
Rigsby, , Bruce, J. & Michael, Silverstein (1969). Nez Perce vowels and Proto-Sahaptian vowel harmony. Lg 45. 45–59.Google Scholar
Schane, , Sanford, A. (1984a). Two English vowel movements: a particle analysis. In Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R. T. (eds.) (1984). Language sound structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 32–51.Google Scholar
Schane, , Sanford, A. (1984b). The fundamentals of particle phonology. Phonology Yearbook. I 129–155.Google Scholar
Skousen, , Royal, (1972). Finnish vowel harmony: rules and conditions. In Michael, Kenstowicz & Charles, Kisseberth (eds.) Issues in phonological theory. The Hague: Mouton. 118–129.Google Scholar
Steriade, , Donca, (1979). Vowel harmony in Khalkha Mongolian. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics I. 25–50.Google Scholar
Tompa, , Jozsef, (1972). Kleine Ungarische Grammatik. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1967) [1939]. Principes de phonologie. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Vago, , Robert, M. (1976). Theoretical implications of Hungarian vowel harmony. LI 7. 243–263.Google Scholar
Vago, , Robert, M. (ed.) (1980a). Issues in vowel harmony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vago, , Robert, M. (1980b). A critique of suprasegmental theories of vowel harmony. In Vago (1980a). 155–181.Google Scholar
Vago, , Robert, M. (1980c). The sound pattern of Hungarian. Washington,: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Vago, , Robert, M. (1984). Morpheme level harmony in a multi-leveled autosegmental framework. Ms, Queens College, CUNY.Google Scholar
Waterson, , Natalie, M. (1956). Some aspects of the phonology of the nominal forms of the Turkish word. BSOAS 18. 578–591. Reprinted in Palmer (1970). 174–187.Google Scholar
Zwicky, , Arnold, (1971). More on Nez Perce: on alternative analyses. IJAL 37. 122–125.Google Scholar