Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:59:58.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voicing contrast in consonant clusters: evidence against sonorant transparency to voice assimilation in Russian*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2014

Vladimir Kulikov
Vladimir Kulikov*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Obstruents in Russian have been claimed to assimilate in voicing in clusters when a sonorant consonant intervenes, e.g. ot mgly [dmg] ‘from the haze’. This phenomenon (‘sonorant transparency to voice assimilation’) is controversial: it is claimed to be a phonological rule of fast speech by some linguists, while its existence is denied by others. Previous studies have shown that voicing in presonorant obstruents (C1) in Russian is consistent with that of prevocalic obstruents in slow speech; however, no research has examined whether voicing in presonorant obstruents changes either as a function of the voicing of the rightmost (C2) obstruent in a cluster or in faster speech. This paper presents experimental results supporting the claim that the voicing of C2 obstruents does not affect voicing in presonorant C1 obstruents in slow or fast speech. The results suggest that obstruents do not assimilate through a sonorant in obstruent–sonorant–obstruent clusters in Russian.

Type
Research Article
Information
Phonology , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , December 2013 , pp. 423 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Catherine Ringen, Jill Beckman and Bob McMurray, as well as three anonymous reviewers and an associate editor, for their insightful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are mine. I am also grateful to the speakers for their participation in the study and to Oleg Polyakov, Vera Romanova, Anna Daen and Olga Davydenkova for their help in recruiting subjects and other assistance. The paper has benefited from comments from the audience at the 5th Annual Meeting of the Slavic Linguistic Society at the University of Chicago, where an earlier version was presented. The research was made possible by a T. Anne Cleary fellowship and a Ballard Seashore fellowship from the University of Iowa.

References

REFERENCES

Alphen van, Petra M. & Smits, Roel (2004). Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives: the role of prevoicing. JPh 32. 455–491.Google Scholar
Avanesov, R. I. (1968). Russkoe literaturnoe proiznoshenie. [Standard Russian pronunciation.] Moscow: Prosveshchenie.Google Scholar
Avanesov, R. I. & Bromlej, S. V. (1986). Dialektologičeskij atlas russkogo jazyka. [The linguistic atlas of Russian.] Vol. 1: Fonetika. [Phonetics.] Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Barry, Susan M. E. (1988). Temporal aspects of the devoicing of word-final obstruents in Russian. In Holmes, J. N. & Ainsworth, W. A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th Federation of Acoustical Societies of Europe Symposium (Speech '88). Edinburgh: Institute of Acoustics. 81–88.Google Scholar
Barry, Susan M. E. (1995). Variation in vocal fold vibration during voiced obstruents in Russian. International Journal of Disorders of Communications 30. 124–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2011). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.2.1). http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana & Cohn, Abigail C. (2009). Complexity in phonetics and phonology, gradience, categoriality, and naturalness. In Pellegrino, François, Marsico, Egidio, Chitoran, Ioana & Coupé, Christophe (eds.) Approaches to phonological complexity. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 21–46.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-mee Yu (1990). Parameters of consonantal assimilation. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine M. (2000). Vowel reduction in Russian: a unified account of standard, dialectal, and ‘dissimilative’ patterns. University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences 1. 107–172.Google Scholar
Dmitrieva, Olga, Jongman, Allard & Sereno, Joan (2010). Phonological neutralization by native and non-native speakers: the case of Russian final devoicing. JPh 38. 483–492.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J. (1992). The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Berlin & New York: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Es'kova, N. A. (1971). K voprosu o svoistvax sonornyx soglasnyx v russkom jazyke. [Toward the acoustics of sonorants in Russian.] In Vysotskij (1971). 243–247.Google Scholar
Fowler, Carol A., Sramko, Valery, Ostry, David J., Rowland, Sarah A. & Hallé, Pierre (2008). Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French–English bilinguals. JPh 36. 649–663.Google ScholarPubMed
Halle, Morris (1959). The sound pattern of Russian: a linguistic and acoustical investigation. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1984). The phonetics and phonology of Russian voicing assimilation. In Aronoff, Mark & Oehrle, Richard T. (eds.) Language sound structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 318–328.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman (1978). Mutual assimilation of Russian voiced and voiceless consonants. Studia Linguistica 32. 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessen, Michael (1998). Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kavitskaya, Darya (1999). Voicing assimilation and schizophrenic behavior of /v/ in Russian. In Dziwirek, Katarzina, Coats, Herbert & Vakareliyska, Cynthia M. (eds.) Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: the Seattle meeting 1998. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. 225–244.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1985). Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Vladimir (2010). Voicing assimilation in fast speech in Russian. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Meeting of the Slavic Linguistic Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Vladimir (2012). Voicing and voice assimilation in Russian stops. PhD dissertation, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Vladimir & McMurray, Bob (in preparation). Voice assimilation and final devoicing in Russian: evidence for incomplete neutralization. Ms, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye (2002). Russian voicing assimilation, final devoicing, and the problem of [v]. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz. Available as ROA-528 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Panov, M. V. (1967). Russkaja fonetika. [Russian phonetics.] Moscow: Prosveshchenie.Google Scholar
Petrova, Olga (2003). Sonorants and the labiodental continuant /v/ in Russian: an OT analysis. In Browne, Wayles, Kim, Ji-Yung, Partee, Barbara H. & Rothstein, Robert A. (eds.) Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: the Amherst meeting 2002. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. 413–432.Google Scholar
Poser, William J. (1982). Phonological representation and action-at-a-distance. In van der Hulst, Harry & Smith, Norval (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. Part 2. Dordrecht: Foris. 121–158.Google Scholar
Ringen, Catherine & Kulikov, Vladimir (2012). Voicing in Russian stops: cross-linguistic implications. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 20. 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robblee, Karen E. & Burton, Martha W. (1997). Sonorant voicing transparency in Russian. In Browne, Wayne & Zec, Draga (eds.) Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: the Cornell meeting 1995. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. 407–434.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon (2011). Long-distance assimilation of consonants. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 1811–1837.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon & Walker, Rachel (2004). A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence. Lg 80. 475–531.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy (1996). Nonsyllabic analysis of voice assimilation in Polish. LI 27. 69–110.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy (1997). Polish Voice Assimilation in Optimality Theory. Rivista di Linguistica 9. 291–342.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy (2000). Backness switch in Russian. Phonology 17. 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy (2008). Prevocalic faithfulness. Phonology 25. 433–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (1995). The prosodic structure of function words. In Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura Walsh & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.) Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst: GLSA. 439–469.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael (1993). Russian non-distinctive voicing: a stocktaking. Russian Linguistics 17. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slis, Imah H. (1986). Assimilation of voice in Dutch as a function of stress, word boundaries, and sex of speaker and listener. JPh 14. 311–326.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1999). Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers in Phonology 3. 25–145.Google Scholar
Strycharczuk, Patrycja (2012). Sonorant transparency and the complexity of voicing in Polish. JPh 40. 655–671.Google Scholar
Ševoroškin, V. V. (1971). O dvux [v] v russkom jazyke. [On two [v]'s in Russian.] In Vysotskij (1971). 279–286.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. (1969). Principles of phonology. Translated by Baltaxe, Christiane A. M.. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vysotskij, S. S. (ed.) (1971). Razvitie fonetiki sovremennogo russkogo jazyka: fonologičeskie podsistemy. [Phonetic development in Modern Russian: phonology.] Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth C. (2000). Phonetic alignment constraints: consonant overlap and palatalization in English and Russian. JPh 28. 69–102.Google Scholar