Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:06:44.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testing the role of phonetic knowledge in Mandarin tone sandhi*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2010

Jie Zhang  and
Yuwen Lai
Jie Zhang
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Yuwen Lai
Affiliation:
National Chiao Tung University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phonological patterns often have phonetic bases. But whether phonetic substance should be encoded in synchronic phonological grammar is controversial. We aim to test the synchronic relevance of phonetics by investigating native Mandarin speakers' applications of two exceptionless tone sandhi processes to novel words: the contour reduction 213→21/—T (T≠213), which has a clear phonetic motivation, and the perceptually neutralising 213→35/—213, whose phonetic motivation is less clear. In two experiments, Mandarin subjects were asked to produce two individual monosyllables together as two different types of novel disyllabic words. Results show that speakers apply the 213→21 sandhi with greater accuracy than the 213→35 sandhi in novel words, indicating a synchronic bias against the phonetically less motivated pattern. We also show that lexical frequency is relevant to the application of the sandhis to novel words, but cannot account alone for the low sandhi accuracy of 213→35.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , May 2010 , pp. 153 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, Adam (2002). Islands of reliability for regular morphology: evidence from Italian. Lg 78. 684–709.Google Scholar
Albright, Adam, Andrade, Argelia & Hayes, Bruce (2001). Segmental environments of Spanish diphthongization. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 7: Papers in Phonology 5. 117–151.Google Scholar
Albright, Adam & Hayes, Bruce (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. Cognition 90. 119–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Stephen R. (1981). Why phonology isn't ‘natural’. LI 12. 493–539.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana & Pulleyblank, Douglas (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald (1992). Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 1991. 109–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald (1993). On frequency, transparency, and productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 1992. 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Emmon & Harms, Robert T. (1972). How do languages get crazy rules? In Stockwell, Robert P. & Macaulay, Ronald K. S. (eds.) Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1–21.Google Scholar
Berko, Jean (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: the emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (2006). A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32. 117–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette & Garrett, Andrew (1998). The origins of consonant–vowel metathesis. Lg 74. 508–556.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, Robert (1988). The fundamental character of foreign language learning. In Rutherford, William E. & Smith, Michael Sharwood (eds.) Grammar and second language teaching: a book of readings. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House. 19–30.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul (1998). Functional phonology: formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2003). Praat: a system for doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene (1999). On the naturalness of unnatural rules. UCSB Working Papers in Linguistics 9. 16–29.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene (2002). Rule naturalness and the acquisition of phonology. Paper presented at the 2nd North American Phonology Conference, Concordia University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene (2003). Children's unnatural phonology. BLS 29. 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan (1985). Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan (2000). The phonology of the lexicon: evidence from lexical diffusion. In Barlow, Michael & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.) Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI. 65–85.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan (2006). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Pardo, Elly (1981). On lexical and morphological conditioning of alternations: a nonce-probe experiment with Spanish verbs. Linguistics 19. 937–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Kyle E., Onishi, Kristine H. & Fisher, Cynthia (2003). Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience. Cognition 87. B69–B77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, Yuen Ren (1948). Mandarin primer: an intensive course in spoken Chinese. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Charles-Luce, Jan (1985). Word-final devoicing in German: effects of phonetic and sentential contexts. JPh 13. 309–324.Google Scholar
Chen, Jenn-Yeu, Chen, Train-Min & Dell, Gary S. (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language 46. 751–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Matthew Y. (2000). Tone sandhi: patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1986). Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. (2008). Grammaticality and ungrammaticality in phonology. Lg 84. 218–257.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pater, Joe (2008). Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic. NLLT 26. 289–337.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail C. (1993). Nasalisation in English: phonology or phonetics. Phonology 10. 43–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Vivian J. (1969). The analogy between first and second language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics 7. 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Vivian J. (1994). The metaphor of access to Universal Grammar in L2 learning. In Ellis, Nick C. (ed.) Implicit and explicit learning of languages. San Diego: Academic Press. 477–502.Google Scholar
Court, Christopher (1985). Observations on some cases of tone sandhi. In Thurgood, Graham, Matisoff, James A. & Bradley, David (eds.) Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: the state of the art. Canberra: Australian National University. 125–137.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne & Chen, Hsuan-Chih (1995). Phonological similarity effects in Cantonese word recognition. In Elenius, Kjell & Branderud, Peter (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Vol. 1. Stockholm: KTH & Stockholm University. 106–109.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne & Chen, Hsuan-Chih (1997). Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Perception and Psychophysics 59. 165–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Da, Jun (1998). Chinese text computing: bigrams and statistical measures. Available (December 2009) at http://lingua.mtsu.edu/chinese-computing/old-version1/statistics/mi.html.Google Scholar
Da, Jun (2004). Chinese text computing: syllable frequencies with tones. Available (December 2009) at http://lingua.mtsu.edu/chinese-computing/phonology/syllabletone.php.Google Scholar
Dell, Gary S., Reed, Kristopher D., Adams, David R. & Meyer, Antje S. (2000). Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: a study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26. 1355–1367.Google ScholarPubMed
Dinnsen, Daniel A. (1984). A re-examination of phonological neutralization. JL 21. 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, San (2000). The phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dulay, Heidi, Burt, Marina & Krashen, Stephen (1982). Language two. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam & Baayen, R. Harald (2003). Predicting the unpredictable: interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Lg 79. 5–38.Google Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam, Lahey, Mybeth, Verhees, Femke & Baayen, R. Harald (2006). Lexical frequency and voice assimilation. JASA 120. 1040–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleischhacker, Heidi (2001). Cluster-dependent epenthesis asymmetries. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 7: Papers in Phonology 5. 71–116.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward (2001). Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology 18. 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Stefan A. & Zawaydeh, Bushra Adnan (2001). The psychological reality of OCP-place in Arabic. Lg 77. 91–106.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Louis, Whalen, D. H. & Best, Catherine T. (eds.) (2006). Laboratory Phonology 8. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mark & Reiss, Charles (2000). ‘Substance abuse’ and ‘dysfunctionalism’: current trends in phonology. LI 31. 157–169.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (2001). Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (2008). Diachronic explanations of sound patterns. Language and Linguistics Compass 2. 859–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Londe, Zsuzsa Cziráky (2006). Stochastic phonological knowledge: the case of Hungarian vowel harmony. Phonology 23. 59–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.) (2004). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Steriade, Donca (2004). Introduction: the phonetic bases of phonological markedness. In Hayes et al. (2004). 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1999). Phonetically driven phonology: the role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In Darnell, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith, Newmeyer, Frederick, Noonan, Michael & Wheatley, Kathleen (eds.) Functionalism and formalism in linguistics. Vol. 1: General papers. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 243–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, Jing-Yi (1980). Pingyao fangyan de liandu biandiao. [Tone sandhi in the Pingyao dialect.] Fangyan [Dialects] 80. 1–14.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Hsin-I (1970). The psychological reality of tone sandhi rules in Taiwanese. CLS 6. 489–503.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Hsin-I (1975). How generative is phonology? In Koerner, E. F. K. (ed.) The transformational-generative paradigm and modern linguistic theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 109–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Hsin-I (1976). On the unreality of some phonological rules. Lingua 38. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth & Johnson, Keith (eds.) (2001). The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2001). The limits of phonetic determinism in phonology: *NC revisited. In Hume & Johnson (2001). 141–185.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2007). Universals of tone rules: 30 years later. In Riad, Tomas & Gussenhoven, Carlos (eds.) Tones and tunes. Vol. 1: Typological studies in word and sentence prosody. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–34.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho (1995). Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: an Optimality-theoretic approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho (2004). Place assimilation. In Hayes et al. (2004). 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel, Bell, Alan, Gregory, Michelle & Raymond, William D. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul (eds.) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 229–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W., Smolensky, Paul, Arnold, Karen & Moreton, Elliott (2003). Acquisition of nasal place assimilation by 4·5-month-old infants. In Houston, Derek, Seidl, Amanda, Hollich, George J., Johnson, Elisabeth & Jusczyk, Ann Marie (eds.) Jusczyk lab final report. Available (December 2009) at http://hincapie.psych.purdue.edu/Jusczyk/pdf/Nasal.pdf.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung (2003). Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean. Phonology 20. 219–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. (1984). Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Lg 60. 286–319.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. (1990). Phonetic representations in a generative grammar. JPh 18. 321–334.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael (2007). Salience and similarity in loanword adaptation: a case study from Fijian. Language Sciences 29. 316–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John & Diehl, Randy L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Lg 70. 419–454.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1985). Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (2006). The amphichronic program vs. Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32. 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, Robert (2000). Geminate inalterability and lenition. Lg 76. 509–545.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert (2001). An effort-based approach to consonant lenition. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert (2004). Consonant lenition. In Hayes et al. (2004). 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chao-Yang (2007). Does horse activate mother? Processing lexical tone in form priming. Language and Speech 50. 101–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Yen-Hwei (2007). The sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, Tsu-lin (1977). Tones and tone sandhi in 16th century Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5. 237–260.Google Scholar
Menn, Lise & Stoel-Gammon, Carol (1995). Phonological development. In Fletcher, Paul & MacWhinney, Brian (eds.) The handbook of child language. Oxford: Blackwell. 335–359.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1982). Lexical Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1993). Fields of attraction in phonology. In Goldsmith, John (ed.) The last phonological rule: reflections on constraints and derivations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 61–116.Google Scholar
Moore, Corinne B. & Jongman, Allard (1997). Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. JASA 102. 1864–1877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreton, Elliott (2008). Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25. 83–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, James (2002). An analogical approach to the Mandarin syllabary. Chinese Phonology 11. 163–190.Google Scholar
Oakes, Michael P. (1998). Statistics for corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A. & Miller, M. F. (eds.) Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 178–203.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1990). The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation. In Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary E. (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 258–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1993). Coarticulation and phonology. Language and Speech 36. 155–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohala, John J. (1997). The relation between phonetics and phonology. In Hardcastle, William J. & Laver, John (eds.) The handbook of phonetic sciences. Oxford & Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell. 674–694.Google Scholar
Onishi, Kristine H., Chambers, Kyle E. & Fisher, Cynthia (2002). Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition 83. B13–B23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, David & Connine, Cynthia M. (2001). Variant frequency in flap production: a corpus analysis of variant frequency in American English flap production. Phonetica 58. 254–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, Shu-Hui (2000). Lexical versus ‘phonological’ representations of Mandarin sandhi tones. In Broe, Michael B. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology V: acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 152–167.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2007). Learning the mapping from surface to underlying representations in an artificial language. In Cole, Jennifer & Hualde, José Ignacio (eds.) Laboratory phonology 9. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 315–338.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon, Skoruppa, Katrin & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2006). The role of phonetic naturalness in phonological rule acquisition. In Bamman, David, Magnitskaia, Tatiana & Zaller, Colleen (eds.) Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press. 464–475.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1990). Phonological and phonetic representation. JPh 18. 375–394.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2003). Probabilistic phonology: discrimination and robustness. In Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer & Jannedy, Stefanie (eds.) Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 177–228.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2006). The statistical basis of an unnatural alternation. In Goldstein, et al. (2006). 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Crawford, Penny (1989). Incomplete neutralization and pragmatics in German. JPh 17. 257–282.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pycha, Anne, Nowak, Pawel, Shin, Eurie & Shosted, Ryan (2003). Phonological rule-learning and its implications for a theory of vowel harmony. WCCFL 22. 423–435.Google Scholar
Qian, Zeng-Yi & Zhu, Guang-Qi (1998). Jinanhua yindang. [A record of the Jinan dialect.] Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Reber, Arthur S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6. 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reber, Arthur S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118. 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redington, Martin & Chater, Nick (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: a reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125. 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, Amanda & Buckley, Eugene (2005). On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Development 1. 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Xiaonan Susan & Lin, Maocan (1991). A perceptual study of Mandarin Tones 2 and 3. Language and Speech 34. 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Xiaonan Susan, Lin, Maocan & Yan, Jingzhu (1993). F0 turning point as an F0 cue to tonal contrast: a case study of Mandarin tones 2 and 3. JASA 93. 2241–2243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, Chilin (1997). Mandarin third tone sandhi and prosodic structure. In Jialing, Wang & Smith, Norval (eds.) Studies in Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 81–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Daniel (2006a). A critical introduction to phonology: of sound, mind, and body. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel (2006b). The diachrony of labiality in Trique, and the functional relevance of gradience and variation. In Goldstein, et al. (2006). 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Theoretical issues. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 1157–1256.Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & Dinnsen, Daniel A. (1985). On the neutralizing status of Polish word-final devoicing. JPh 13. 325–341.Google Scholar
Stampe, David (1979). A dissertation on Natural Phonology. New York & London: Garland.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1999). Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 2: Papers in Phonology 3. 25–146.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (2001). Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: a perceptual account. In Hume & Johnson (2001). 219–250.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (2008). The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In Hanson, Kristin & Inkelas, Sharon (eds.) The nature of the word: studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca & Zhang, Jie (2001). Context-dependent similarity and the Romanian semi-rime. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Taft, Marcus & Chen, Hsuan-Chih (1992). Judging homophony in Chinese: the influence of tones. In Chen, Hsuan-Chih & Tzeng, Ovid J. L. (eds.) Language processing in Chinese. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatte, Victoria Anne (2007). Phonetic motivation as a learning bias in phonological acquisition: an experimental study. MA thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Wang, H. Samuel (1993). Taiyu biandiao de xinli texing. [On the psychological status of Taiwanese tone sandhi.] Tsinghua Xuebao [Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies] 23. 175–192.Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha, Jongman, Allard, Sereno, Joan & Kemps, Rachèl (2004). Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: evidence from Dutch. JPh 32. 251–276.Google Scholar
Wen, Duan-Zheng & Shen, Ming (1999). Taiyuanhua yindang. [A record of the Taiyuan dialect.] Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Wilson, Colin (2003). Experimental investigation of phonological naturalness. WCCFL 22. 533–546.Google Scholar
Wilson, Colin (2006). Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30. 945–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Zi-Xiang, Guo, He-Tong & Shi, Xiang-Dong (1999). Tianjinhua yindang. [A record of the Tianjin dialect.] Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Ye, Yun & Connine, Cynthia M. (1999). Processing spoken Chinese: the role of tone information. Language and Cognitive Processes 14. 609–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Michael C. W. (2001). Phonological priming in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Psychologia 44. 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Michael C. W., Leung, Po-Yee & Chen, Hsuan-Chih (1998). Phonological similarity effects in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Proceedings of ICSLP ’98. Vol. 5. Sydney. 2139–2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. (2004). Explaining final obstruent voicing in Lezgian: phonetics and history. Lg 80. 73–97.Google Scholar
Yue-Hashimoto, Anne O. (1987). Tone sandhi across Chinese dialects. In Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong (ed.) Wang Li memorial volumes: English volume. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing Co. 445–474.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie (2002). The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone: typological survey and formal analysis. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie (2004). The role of contrast-specific and language-specific phonetics in contour tone distribution. In Hayes et al. (2004). 157–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Jie (2007). A directional asymmetry in Chinese tone sandhi systems. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16. 259–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Jie & Lai, Yuwen (2008). Phonological knowledge beyond the lexicon in Taiwanese double reduplication. In Hsiao, Yuchau E., Hsu, Hui-Chuan, Wee, Lian-Hee & Ho, Dah-An (eds.) Interfaces in Chinese phonology: Festschrift in honor of Matthew Y. Chen on his 70th birthday. Taiwan: Academia Sinica. 183–222.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie, Lai, Yuwen & Sailor, Craig (2009a). Opacity, phonetics, and frequency in Taiwanese tone sandhi. In Current issues in unity and diversity of languages: collection of papers selected from the 18th International Congress of Linguists. Linguistic Society of Korea. 3019–3038.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie, Lai, Yuwen & Sailor, Craig (2009b). Effects of phonetics and frequency on the productivity of Taiwanese tone sandhi. CLS 43:1. 273–286.Google Scholar
Zhang, Ning (1997). The avoidance of the third tone sandhi in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6. 293–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zue, Victor W. & Laferriere, Martha (1979). Acoustical study of medial /t,d/ in American English. JASA 66. 1039–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuraw, Kie (2000). Patterned exceptions in phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie (2007). The role of phonetic knowledge in phonological patterning: corpus and survey evidence from Tagalog infixation. Lg 83. 277–316.Google Scholar