Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:35:28.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress and tone in East Slavic dialects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2006

Christina Y. Bethin
Affiliation:
Stony Brook University

Abstract

The East Slavic languages have distinctive stress and no contrastive vowel length; the phonetic correlates of word stress are increased vowel duration, intensity and changes in vowel quality. But there are East Slavic dialects with an unusual type of word prosody: word stress is distinctive, yet the immediately pretonic vowel is as long as or longer than the vowel under stress, and there is a fixed tonal contour over the two syllables. I argue that the additional duration in the pretonic syllable is due to a type of stress-to-tone mapping in which a lexical high tone is assigned to the pretonic syllable. Variation across these and other closely related dialects reveals a typology of stress and tone mapping with increasing dependence on intrinsic vowel duration and sonority. The additional vowel length on neutralised/reduced vowels in the immediately pretonic position in some dialects raises questions about the relationship of vowel duration and vowel reduction in East Slavic. The prosody of these East Slavic dialects appears to be typologically unusual in having both lexical stress and non-contrastive tone, and in specifically not aligning high tone with stress.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank John Alderete, Mark Aronoff, Ellen Broselow, Marie Huffman, Darya Kavitskaya, Jaye Padgett and audiences at FASL 13, AATSEEL Annual Meetings, the Yale University Linguistics Colloquium and Stony Brook University for thoughtful questions and comments on an earlier version of this work. I am also grateful to the guest editors of this thematic issue and to Bob Ladd and the journal editors for detailed and helpful guidance. The extensive comments of three anonymous reviewers significantly contributed to the improvement of the paper. Any remaining shortcomings are mine.