Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nqxm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-20T20:12:03.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Segment structure and coronal underspecification*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Peter Avery  and
Keren Rice
Peter Avery
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Keren Rice
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ponapean, Catalan and English provide strong evidence that the Coronal node must be absent in underlying representation. In none of these languages are coronals distinguished by a secondary content node, and thus the NAC does not force the presence of a Coronal node. As expected, phonological processes separate the coronals from the other places of articulation in these languages.

Type
Thematic Papers
Information
Phonology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , August 1989 , pp. 179 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Allen, W. S. (1962). Sandhi. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Ewen, C. J. (1987). Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, D. (1988). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5. 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (forthcoming). The content and structure of phonological representations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Avery, P. & Rice, K. (1988). Constraining underspecification. To appear in NELS 19.Google Scholar
Beeler, M. S. (1970). Sibilant harmony in Chumash. IJAL 36. 14–17.Google Scholar
Borowsky, T. (1986). Topics in English phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Cho, Y. (1988). Korean assimilation. WCCFL 7. 41–52.Google Scholar
Christdas, P. (1988). The phonology and morphology of Tamil. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1988). Towards a substantive theory of feature specification. NELS 18. 79–93.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (forthcoming). An argument for radical underspecification in English. LI.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (1989). The geometry of vocalic features. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.) Features, segmental structure and harmony processes. Dordrecht: Foris. 77–126.Google Scholar
Itô, J. (1986). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Iverson, G. K. & Kim, K.-H. (1987). Underspecification and hierarchical feature representation in Korean consonantal phonology. CLS 23:2. 182–198.Google Scholar
Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kean, M.-L. (1975). The theory of markedness in generative grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Keating, P. (1987). Palatals as complex coronals: X-ray evidence. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, 12 1987.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Yang, I.-S. (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1985). Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1982). A course in phonetics. 2nd edn.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1976). English phonology and phonological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, J. (1987). A place for lateral in the feature geometry. Paper presented at the 6znd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, December 1987.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (1987). An integrated theory of autosegmental processes. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1986). OCP effects: gemination and antigemination. LI 17. 207–263.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency. To appear in Fujimura, O. (ed,) Articulatory organization: from phonology to speech signals. Basle: Karger.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascaró, J. (1976). Catalan phonology and the phonological cycle. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Mascaró, J. (1987). A reduction and spreading theory of voicing and other sound effects. Ms, Universitat Aut´noma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Mester, R. A. (1986). Studies in tier structure. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Mester, R. A. & Itô, J. (1989). Feature predictability and underspecification: palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Lg 65. 258–293.Google Scholar
Paradis, C. & Prunet, J.-F. (1988). Markedness and coronal structure. To appear in NELS 19.Google Scholar
Piggott, G. (1988). The parameters of nasalization. Ms, McGill University.Google Scholar
Poser, W. (1982). Phonological representations and action-at-a-distance. In van der Hulst, H. and Smith, N. (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. Part 2. Dordrecht: Foris. 121–158.Google Scholar
Rehg, K. L. & Sohl, D. G. (1981). Ponapean reference grammar. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, K. & Avery, P. (1987). Underspecification and reduplication in Ponapean. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, December 1987.Google Scholar
Rice, K. & Avery, P. (1989). On the relationship between sonorancy and voicing. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 10.Google Scholar
Sagey, E. (1986) The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Schein, B. & Steriade, D. (1986). On geminates. LI 17. 691–744.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1987). Redundant values. CLS 23:2. 339–362.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. & Keyser, S. J. (1989). Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Lg 65. 81–106.Google Scholar
Whitney, W. D. (1889). Sanskrit grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yip, M. (1988). The OCP and phonological rules: a loss of identity. LI 19. 65–100.Google Scholar