Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:18:42.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonotactics and the prestopped velar lateral of Hiw: resolving the ambiguity of a complex segment*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2010

Alexandre François
Alexandre François
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Australian National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Complex segments consisting of two phases are potentially ambivalent as to which phase determines their phonemic status – e.g. whether // is a stop or a nasal. This theoretical problem is addressed here with respect to a typologically unusual phoneme in Hiw, an endangered Oceanic language of Vanuatu. This complex segment, //, combines a velar voiced stop and a velar lateral approximant. Similar phonemes, in the few languages which have them, have been variously described as (laterally released) stops, affricates or (prestopped) laterals. The nature of Hiw // can be established from its patterning in tautosyllabic consonant clusters. The licensing of word-initial CC clusters in Hiw complies with the Sonority Sequencing Principle, albeit with some adjustments. Consequently, the well-formedness of words like /mejiŋə/ ‘berserk’ relies on // being analysed as a prestopped velar lateral approximant – the only liquid in the system.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , December 2010 , pp. 393 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Stephen R. (1976). Nasal consonants and the internal structure of segments. Lg 52. 326–344.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Plínio A. & Albano, Eleonora C. (2004). Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34. 227–232.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (1994). A place for lateral in the feature geometry. JL 30. 301–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In Goldsmith (1995). 206–244.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette & Pawley, Andrew (2010). Typological implications of Kalam predictable vowels. Phonology 27. 1–44.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert (2009). The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Breen, Gavan & Pensalfini, Rob (1999). Arrernte: a language with no syllable onsets. LI 30. 1–25.Google Scholar
Butcher, Andrew (2006). Australian aboriginal languages: consonant-salient phonologies and the ‘place-of-articulation imperative’. In Harrington, Jonathan & Tabain, Maria (eds.) Speech production: models, phonetic processes, and techniques. New York: Psychology Press. 187–210.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle (1974). Phonological features: problems and proposals. Lg 50. 52–65.Google Scholar
Charpentier, Jean-Michel & François, Alexandre (forthcoming). Atlas linguistique de Polynésie Française – Linguistic atlas of French Polynesia. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-mee Yu & King, Tracy Holloway (2003). Semisyllables and universal syllabification. In de Vijver, Caroline Féry & Ruben van (eds.) The syllable in Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 183–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Chumakina, Marina, Corbett, Greville G. & Brown, Dunstan (2008). Archi language tutorial. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Clark, Ross (2009). *Leo Tuai: A comparative lexical study of North and Central Vanuatu languages. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary E. (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 283–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Terry (2006). The Avava language of Central Malakula (Vanuatu). Edited by Lynch, John. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan (1995). Martuthunira: a language of the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1980). The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doble, Marion (1987). A description of some features of Ekari language structure. Oceanic Linguistics 26. 55–113.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark (2004). A grammar of the Skou language of New Guinea. Ms, University of Singapore. Available (September 2010) at http://papuaweb.anu.edu.au/dlib/tema/bahasa/skou.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark (2007). The Papuan language of Tambora. Oceanic Linguistics 46. 520–537.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A. & Ziwo, Lama (1999). Laghuu or Xá Phó, a new language of the Yi group. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 22. 1–10.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas (1995). Current issues in the phonology of Australian languages. In Goldsmith (1995). 723–761.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Levinson, Stephen C. (2009). The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–448.Google Scholar
Ewen, Colin J. (1982). The internal structure of complex segments. In Hulst, Harry van der & Smith, Norval (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. Part 2. Dordrecht: Foris. 27–67.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. (1986). The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre (2002). Araki: a disappearing language of Vanuatu. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre (2005). Unraveling the history of the vowels of seventeen northern Vanuatu languages. Oceanic Linguistics 44. 443–504.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre (2009). Stress-driven sonority in Hiw, Vanuatu. Ms, CNRS & Australian National University.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre (ms). Lexical reconstructions for proto-Torres-Banks (northern Vanuatu). LACITO-CNRS & Australian National University.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre (forthcoming). Where *R they all? The geography and history of *R loss in Vanuatu. Oceanic Linguistics.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. (ed.) (1995). The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geraghty, Paul (1990). Proto-Eastern Oceanic *R and its reflexes. In Davidson, Jeremy H. C. S. (ed.) Pacific Island languages: Essays in honour of G. B. Milner. London & Honolulu: School of Oriental and African Studies & University of Hawaii Press. 51–93.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. (1978). Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles A. & Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.) Universals of human language. Vol. 2: Phonology. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 243–279.Google Scholar
Hajek, John & Bowden, John (1999). Taba and Roma: clusters and geminates in two Austronesian languages. In Ohala, John J., Hasegawa, Yoko, Ohala, Manjari, Granville, Daniel & Bailey, Ashlee C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Berkeley: Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley. 1033–1036.Google Scholar
Harris, John (2006). The phonology of being understood: further arguments against sonority. Lingua 116. 1483–1494.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin (2007). Pre-established categories don't exist: consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 119–132.Google Scholar
Henderson, John K. & Dobson, Veronica (1994). Eastern and Central Arrernte to English dictionary. Alice Springs: IAD Press.Google Scholar
Hercus, L. A. (1972). The pre-stopped nasal and lateral consonants of Arabana-Waŋgaŋuru. Anthropological Linguistics 14. 293–305.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth (1998). Metathesis in phonological theory: the case of Leti. Lingua 104. 147–186.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2008). Universals in phonology. The Linguistic Review 25. 83–137.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko (1989). A prosodic theory of epenthesis. NLLT 7. 217–259.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto (1904). Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig & Berlin: Teubner.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kodzasov, S. V. 1977. Fonetika Archinskogo jazyka. In Kibrik, A. E., Kodzasov, S. V., Olovyannikova, I. P. & Samedov, D. S. (eds.) Opyt strukturnogo opisanija archinskogo jazyka. Vol. 1: Leksika, Fonetika. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta. 185–355.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter (1971). Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter, Cochran, Anne & Disner, Sandra (1977). Laterals and trills. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 7. 46–54.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian (1996). The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford & Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn (1983). Economy of speech gestures. In MacNeilage, Peter F. (ed.) The production of speech. New York: Springer. 217–245.Google Scholar
Lynch, John (1983). On the Kuman ‘liquids’. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 14. 98–112.Google Scholar
Lynch, John (2008). Liquid vocalization and loss in Central Vanuatu. Oceanic Linguistics 47. 294–315.Google Scholar
Lynch, John (2009). Irregular sound change and the post-velars in some Malakula languages. In Adelaar, Alexander & Pawley, Andrew (eds.) Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: a festschrift for Bob Blust. Canberra: Australian National University. 57–72.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian (2008). Lateral consonants. In Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds.) The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Available (September 2010) at http://wals.info/feature/8.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff (2005). Ambivalence and ambiguity in laterals and nasals. Phonology 22. 169–203.Google Scholar
Milke, Wilhelm (1958). Zur inneren Gliederung und geschichtlichen Stellung der ozeanisch-austronesischen Sprachen. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 83. 58–62.Google Scholar
Morelli, Frida (1999). The phonotactics and phonology of obstruent clusters in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Moxness, Mike (2002). Auye grammar. Ms, Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1990). Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. CLS 26:2. 319–338.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Lorentz, James (1977). The story of [w]: an exercise in the phonetic explanation for sound patterns. BLS 3. 577–599.Google Scholar
Ozanne-Rivierre, Françoise (1995). Structural changes in the languages of Northern New Caledonia. Oceanic Linguistics 34. 45–72.Google Scholar
Parker, Steve (2002). Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Parker, Steve (2008). Sound level protrusions as physical correlates of sonority. JPh 36. 55–90.Google Scholar
Pfantz, Daryl & Pfantz, Mary (2005). Kuman language [Simbu province]. In Parker, Steve (ed.) Phonological descriptions of Papua New Guinea languages. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Summer Institute of Linguistics. 19–26.Google Scholar
Piau, Julie Anne (1985). The verbal syntax of Kuman. MA thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Pike, Eunice V. (1964). The phonology of New Guinea Highlands languages. In Watson, James B. (ed.) New Guinea: the central highlands. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association. 121–132.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Evelyn (1975). Middle-Wahgi dictionary. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Renck, G. L. (1975). A grammar of Yagaria. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Renck, G. L. (ms). Yagaria organised phonology Data. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Available (September 2010) at http://www.sil.org/pacific/png/pubs/0000370/Yagaria.pdf.Google Scholar
Rivierre, Françoise (1975). Phonologie du nemi (Nouvelle Calédonie) et notes sur les consonnes postnasalisées. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 70:1. 345–356.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D. (1988). Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of Western Melanesia. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D. (1998). Proto Oceanic phonology and morphology. In Ross, Malcolm D., Pawley, Andrew & Osmond, Meredith (eds.) The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: the culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society. Vol. 1: Material culture. Canberra: Australian National University. 15–35.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D. & Næss, Åshild (2007). An Oceanic origin for Äiwoo, the language of the Reef Islands? Oceanic Linguistics 46. 456–498.Google Scholar
Rumsey, Alan (2007). Musical, poetic, and linguistic form in Tom Yaya sung narratives from Papua New Guinea. Anthropological Linguistics 49. 235–282.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, Mark & Oerhle, Richard T. (eds.) Language sound structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 107–136.Google Scholar
Shaw, Patricia A. (1989). The complex status of complex segments in Dakota. In Gerdts, Donna B. & Michelson, Karin (eds.) Theoretical perspectives on native American languages. Albany: State University of New York Press. 3–37.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard (1881). Grundzüge der Phonetik, zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
SIL (2004). Wahgi organised phonology data. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Available (September 2010) at http://www.sil.org/pacific/png/pubs/0000357/Wahgi.pdf.Google Scholar
Steed, William & Hardie, Peter (2004). Acoustic properties of the Kuman voiceless velar lateral fricative. In Bow, Catherine (ed.) Proceedings of the 10th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Sydney: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association. 346–351.Google Scholar
Stell, Nélida (1972). Fonología de la lengua Axluxlaj. Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios Lingüísticos.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1982). Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Stucky, Al (1994a). Nii organised phonology data. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Available (September 2010) at http://www.sil.org/pacific/png/show_work.asp?id=274.Google Scholar
Stucky, Al (1994b). Melpa organised phonology data. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Available (September 2010) at http://www.sil.org/pacific/png/show_work.asp?id=241.Google Scholar
Stucky, Al & Stucky, Dellene. 1973. Nii phonology. In Healey, A. (ed.) Studies in languages of the Ok family. Vol. 2. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Summer Institute of Linguistics. 37–78. Available (September 2010) at http://www.sil.org/pacific/png/pubs/12435/Nii_Phonology.pdf.Google Scholar
Tryon, Darrell T. (1976). New Hebrides languages: an internal classification. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo (1988). Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change: with special reference to German, Germanic, Italian, and Latin. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weijer, Jeroen van de (1993). The Manner–Place dependency in complex segments. Linguistics 31. 87–110.Google Scholar
Wittersheim, Éric (2009). Le salaire du poete – The poet's salary. Documentary film. Paris: CNRS-LACITO & Honolulu: Pacific Islands Development Program.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard (2004). A review of perceptual cues and robustness. In Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.) Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 34–57.Google Scholar
Young, Rosemary (1962). The phonemes of Kanite, Kamano, Benabina, and Gahuku. Oceania Linguistic Monograph 6. 90–110.Google Scholar