Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:30:28.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptual distinctness and long-distance laryngeal restrictions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2010

Gillian Gallagher
Gillian Gallagher
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, I present an analysis of the typology of laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions based on contrast markedness. The key ingredient of the analysis, for which I provide experimental support, is that laryngeal co-occurrence phenomena reflect a preference for maximising the perceptual distinctness of contrasts between words (Flemming 1995, 2004). An AX discrimination task finds that the contrast between an ejective and a plain stop is less accurately perceived in the context of another ejective in the word than in the context of another plain stop in the word. Pairs of words like [k'ap'i] and [k'api], which contrast 2 vs. 1 ejectives, are less reliably distinguished than pairs of words like [kap'i] and [kapi], which contrast 1 vs. 0 ejectives. The unifying factor of all laryngeal co-occurrence patterns is the neutralisation of the contrast between words with one and two laryngeally marked segments, exactly the contrast that is shown to be relatively perceptually weak.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , December 2010 , pp. 435 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abraham, R. C. (1959). The language of the Hausa people. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Ajacopa, Teofila Laime, Cazazola, Efraín & Pairumani, Félix Layme (2007). Diccionario bilingüe: iskay simipi yuyayk'ancha (quechua–castellano castellano–quechua). 2nd edn. La Paz.Google Scholar
Aulie, H. Wilbur & Aulie, Evelyn W. (1978). Diccionario ch'ol–español, español–ch'ol. México, D. F.: Institutó Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Ayala Loayza, Juan Luis (1988). Diccionario español–aymara, aymara–español. Lima: Editorial J. Mejia Baca.Google Scholar
Banksira, Degif Petros (2000). Sound mutations: the morphophonology of Chaha. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, René van den & Sidu, La Ode (1996). Muna–English dictionary. Leiden: KITLV Press.Google Scholar
Berkeley, Deborah M. (1994). The OCP and gradient data. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 24. 59–72.Google Scholar
Brown, Jason C. (2008). Theoretical aspects of Gitksan phonology. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene (1997). Tigrinya root consonants and the OCP. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4:3. 19–51.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pater, Joe (2008). Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic. NLLT 26. 289–337.Google Scholar
Dayley, Jon P. (1985). Tzutujil grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2002). The formal expression of markedness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2006). Markedness: reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deza Galindo, Juan Francisco (1989). Jaya mara aru: nuevo diccionario aymara–castellano, castellano–aymara. Lima: Graphos 100 Editores.Google Scholar
Doke, C. M., Malcolm, D. M., Sikakana, J. M. A. & Vilakazi, B. W. (1990). English–Zulu Zulu–English Dictionary. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Dorsey, James Owen & Swanton, John R. (1912). A dictionary of the Biloxi and Ofo Languages. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnography.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward (1995). Auditory representations in phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward (2004). Contrast and perceptual distinctiveness. In Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.) Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 232–276.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward (2006). The role of distinctiveness constraints in phonology. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Frisch, Stefan A., Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Broe, Michael B. (2004). Similarity avoidance and the OCP. NLLT 22. 179–228.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Gillian & Coon, Jessica (2009). Distinguishing total and partial identity: evidence from Chol. NLLT 27. 545–582.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria (2003). Deriving economy: syncope in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. (1950). The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. Word 6. 162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (2001). Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul (1973). Glottalized and murmured occlusives in Indo-European. Glossa 7. 141–166.Google Scholar
Howe, Darin & Pulleyblank, Douglas (2001). Patterns and timing of glottalisation. Phonology 18. 45–80.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (2003). Japanese morphophonemics: markedness and word structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian (2008). Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 59. 434–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenewari, Charles E. W. (1989). Ijoid. In Bendor-Samuel, John (ed.) The Niger-Congo languages. Lanham: University Press America. 105–118.Google Scholar
Khumalo, James S. M. (1987). An autosegmental account of Zulu phonology. PhD dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
Kingston, John (1985). The phonetics and phonology of the timing of oral and glottal events. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kingston, John (2005). The phonetics of Athabaskan tonogenesis. In Hargus, Sharon & Rice, Keren (eds.) Athabaskan prosody. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 137–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, Aert H. (1974). The Shuswap language: grammar, texts, dictionary. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter (2003). Phonetic data analysis: an introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian (1996). The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford & Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lafon, René (1958). Contribution à l'étude phonologique de parler basque de Larrau (Haute-Soule). In Catalán, Diego (ed.) Estructuralismo e historia: miscelánea homenaje a André Martinet. Vol. 2. La Laguna, Canarias: Universidad de la Laguna. 77–106.Google Scholar
Leben, William (1973). Suprasegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Leslau, Wolf (1979). Etymological dictionary of Gurage (Ethiopic). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Lindau, Mona (1984). Phonetic differences in glottalic consonants. JPh 12. 147–155.Google Scholar
Łubowicz, Anna (2003). Contrast preservation in phonological mappings. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Lucca, Manuel F. de (1987). Diccionario practico aymara–castellano castellano–aymara. La Paz: Editorial Los Amigos del Libro.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. LI 12. 373–418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1986). OCP effects: gemination and antigemination. LI 17. 207–263.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura Walsh & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.) Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst: GLSA. 249–384.Google Scholar
MacEachern, Margaret (1999). Laryngeal cooccurrence restrictions. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Sara (2009). Contrast and similarity in consonant harmony processes. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Mester, Armin (1986). Studies in tier structure. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Miller, Wick R. (1965). Acoma grammar and texts. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Molitor, Joseph (1952). Altgeorgisches Glossar zu ausgewahlten Bibeltexten. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar
Ní Chiosáin, Máire & Padgett, Jaye (2009). Contrast, comparison sets, and the perceptual space. In Parker, Steve (ed.) Phonological argumentation: essays on evidence and motivation. London: Equinox. 103–121.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A. & Miller, M. F. (eds.) Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 178–203.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1993). The phonetics of sound change. In Jones, Charles (ed.) Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives. London: Longman. 237–278.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye (2003). Systemic contrast and Catalan rhotics. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1993). Dissimilarity in Arabic verbal roots. NELS 23. 367–381.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (1997). Paninian relations. Lecture given at LSA Summer Institute, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon & King, Lisa (2007). Speech error elicitation and co-occurrence restrictions in two Ethiopian Semitic languages. Language and Speech 50. 451–504.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon & Walker, Rachel (2004). A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence. Lg 80. 475–531.Google Scholar
Sanders, Nathan (2003). Opacity and sound change in the Polish lexicon. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Sharma, Jagdish Chander (1979). Gojri phonetic reader. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1999). Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers in Phonology 3. 25–145.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (2009). The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In Hanson, Kristin & Inkelas, Sharon (eds.) The nature of the word: studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 151–179.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Keiichiro (1998). A typological investigation of dissimilation. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Swanton, John R. (1909). A new Siouan dialect. In Boas, Franz, Dixon, Roland B., Hodge, F. W., Kroeber, Alfred L. & Smith, Harlan I. (eds.) Anthropological essays presented to Frederic Ward Putnam. New York: Stechert. 477–486.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight (1885). The roots, verb-forms, and primary derivatives of the Sanskrit language. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight (1889). A Sanskrit grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Colin & Obdeyn, Marieke (2009). Simplifying subsidiary theory: statistical evidence from Arabic, Muna, Shona and Wargamay. Ms, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar