Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:23:43.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Palatalisability via feature compatibility*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2009

Kazutaka Kurisu
Kazutaka Kurisu
Affiliation:
Kobe College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Productive palatalisation is a striking property of Japanese mimetic items. The docking site of the [−anterior] feature is contingent on consonantal place, and rhotics resist palatalisation. Cross-linguistically, consonantal places differ in palatalisability, and palatalised apical rhotics are not preferred. Bringing together the cross-linguistic insights offered by Rose (1997b) and Hall (2000), I offer a new account of Japanese mimetic palatalisation, which crucially appeals to the notion of feature compatibility. The proposed analysis is attractive for two reasons. First, feature compatibility is firmly grounded in robust cross-linguistic tendencies. Second, the analysis covers a much wider range of data than that proposed by Zoll (1996, 1997), which is based on constituent-initial licensing of complex segments. The analysis defended in the present work is thus desirable both cross-linguistically and empirically.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 437 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abondolo, Daniel (1998a). Khanty. In Abondolo (1998b). 358–386.Google Scholar
Abondolo, Daniel (ed.) (1998b). The Uralic languages. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alderete, John (1995). Faithfulness to prosodic heads. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available as ROA-94 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Alderete, John (1999). Morphologically governed accent in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Alderete, John & Kochetov, Alexei (2009). Japanese mimetic palatalisation revisited: implications for conflicting directionality. Phonology 26. 369–388.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana (1984). Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana & Pulleyblank, Douglas (1989). Yoruba vowel harmony. LI 20. 173–217.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana & Pulleyblank, Douglas (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Avery, Peter & Rice, Keren (1989). Segment structure and coronal underspecification. Phonology 6. 179–200.Google Scholar
Banksira, Degif Petros (2000). Sound mutations: the morphophonology of Chaha. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill N. (1997). Positional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and Shona vowel height harmony. Phonology 14. 1–46.Google Scholar
Beckman, Jill N. (1998). Positional faithfulness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura Walsh & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.) (1995). Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S. (1978). A general study of palatalization. In Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles A. & Moravcsik, Edith (eds.) Universals of human language. Vol. 2: Phonology. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 47–92.Google Scholar
Bhat, Roopkrishen (1987). A descriptive study of Kashmiri. Delhi: Amar Prakashan.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (1994). A place for lateral in the feature geometry. JL 30. 301–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Bernard (1950). Studies in colloquial Japanese IV: phonemics. Lg 26. 86–125.Google Scholar
Borowsky, Toni (1986). Topics in the lexical phonology of English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Borowsky, Toni (1987). Antigemination in English phonology. LI 18. 671–678.Google Scholar
Browne, Wayles (1993). Serbo-Croat. In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 306–387.Google Scholar
Carlton, Terence R. (1991). Introduction to the phonological history of the Slavic languages. Columbus: Slavica.Google Scholar
Casali, Roderic F. (1996). Resolving hiatus. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong (2001). Effects of morpheme boundaries on intergestural timing: evidence from Korean. Phonetica 58. 129–162.Google Scholar
Christdas, Prathima (1988). The phonology and morphology of Tamil. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1976). Palatalization: linking or assimilation? CLS 12. 96–109.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1988). Toward a substantive theory of feature specification. NELS 18. 79–93.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (2001). Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In Hall (2001). 71–146.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Hume, Elizabeth V. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In Goldsmith (1995). 245–306.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail (1992). The consequences of dissimilation in Sundanese. Phonology 9. 199–220.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Corbett, Greville G. (eds.) (1993). The Slavonic languages. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Connell, Bruce & Arvaniti, Amalia (eds.) (1995). Phonology and phonetic evidence: papers in laboratory phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine (1999). Vowel reduction in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Csúcs, Sándor (1998). Udmurt. In Abondolo (1998b). 276–304.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa, Jusczyk, Peter & Smolensky, Paul (2004). The initial and final states: theoretical implications and experimental explorations of Richness of the Base. In Kager, René, Pater, Joe & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.) Constraints in phonological acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 321–368.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (2002). The formal expression of markedness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Fallon, Paul D. (1999). Debuccalization with preservation of secondary articulation. WCCFL 17. 190–204.Google Scholar
Fleischhacker, Heidi (2005). Similarity in phonology: evidence from reduplication and loan adaptation. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward (1995). Auditory representations in phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. (1993). Macedonian. In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 249–305.Google Scholar
Goad, Heather (1997). Coronals are not underspecified. WCCFL 15. 161–175.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. (ed.) (1995). The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, T. Alan (1997). The phonology of coronals. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. Alan (2000). Typological generalizations concerning secondary palatalization. Lingua 110. 1–25.Google Scholar
Hall, T. Alan (ed.) (2001). Distinctive feature theory. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamano, Shoko (1998). The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hausenberg, Anu-Reet (1998). Komi. In Abondolo (1998b). 305–326.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.) (2004). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helimski, Eugene (1998). Selkup. In Abondolo (1998b). 548–579.Google Scholar
Hetzron, Robert (1977). The Gunnän-Gurage languages. Naples: Istituto Orientale di Napoli.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich (1991). Principles of historical linguistics. 2nd edn. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holst, Tara & Nolan, Francis (1995). The influence of syntactic structure on [s] to [ʃ] assimilation. In Connell & Arvaniti (1995). 315–333.Google Scholar
Honti, László (1998). ObUgrian. In Abondolo (1998b). 327–357.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth (1990). Front vowels, palatal consonants and the rule of umlaut in Korean. NELS 20. 230–243.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth (1992). Front vowels, coronal consonants and their interaction in nonlinear phonology. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth (1996). Coronal consonant, front vowel parallels in Maltese. NLLT 14. 163–203.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth & Johnson, Keith (eds.) (2001). The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry (1990). Non-exhaustive syllabification: evidence from Nigeria and Cameroon. CLS 26:2. 175–195.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko (1986). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko (1989). A prosodic theory of epenthesis. NLLT 7. 217–259.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin (1993). Licensed segments and safe paths. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38. 197–213.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin (1995a). Japanese phonology. In Goldsmith (1995). 817–838.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin (1995b). The core–periphery structure of the lexicon and constraints on reranking. In Beckman et al. (1995). 181–209.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin (1999). The phonological lexicon. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.) The handbook of Japanese linguistics. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 62–100.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko, Mester, Armin & Padgett, Jaye (1995). Licensing and underspecification in Optimality Theory. LI 26. 571–613.Google Scholar
Johnson, Douglas (1975). Phonological channels in Chaha. Afroasiatic Linguistics 2. 1–13.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho (1995). Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: an Optimality-theoretic approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Kangasmaa-Minn, Eeva (1998). Mari. In Abondolo (1998b). 219–248.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia (1988). Palatals as complex segments: X-ray evidence. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 69. 77–91.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia (1991). Coronal places of articulation. In Paradis & Prunet (1991b). 29–48.Google Scholar
Kingston, John (1993). Size, structure, and markedness in phonological inventories. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 16. 69–123.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei (2001). Production, perception, and emergent phonotactic patterns: a case of contrastive palatalization. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Kurisu, Kazutaka (2000). Richness of the base and root fusion in Sino-Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9. 147–185.Google Scholar
Kurisu, Kazutaka (2001). The phonology of morpheme realization. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi & Evers, Vincent (1991). Palatalization and coronality. In Paradis & Prunet (1991b). 79–100.Google Scholar
Leslau, Wolf (1958). The verb in Harari (South Ethiopic). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Paul M. (1987). From Latin to Spanish. Vol. 1: Historical phonology and morphology of the Spanish language. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda (1991). Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda (1995). Laryngeal neutralization and syllable wellformedness. NLLT 13. 39–74.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda (1997). Coronal epenthesis and markedness. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 5. 156–175.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda (1999). Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory. NLLT 17. 267–302.Google Scholar
Luzbetak, Louis J. (1956). Middle Wahgi phonology. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1983). Consonantal morphology in the Chaha verb. WCCFL 2. 176–188.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 45. 84–108.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1991). Semitic gutturals and distinctive feature theory. In Comrie, Bernard & Eid, Mushira (eds.) Perspectives on Arabic linguistics III. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1994). The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In Keating, Patricia A. (ed.) Phonological structure and phonetic form: papers in laboratory phonology III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 191–233.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20. 75–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman et al. (1995). 249–384.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Taub, Alison (1992). Review of Paradis & Prunet (1991b). Phonology 9. 363–370.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. (1968). The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
MacEachern, Margaret R. (1997). Laryngeal cooccurrence restrictions. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian (1984). Patterns of sound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayo, Peter (1993). Belorussian. In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 887–946.Google Scholar
Mester, Armin & Itô, Junko (1989). Feature predictability and underspecification: palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Lg 65. 258–293.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1991). On the bases of radical underspecification. NLLT 9. 285–325.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1995). The organization of the grammar. In Goldsmith (1995). 24–69.Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott & Amano, Shigeaki (1999). Phonotactics in the perception of Japanese vowel length: evidence for long-distance dependencies. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Budapest. 2679–2682.Google Scholar
Ní Chiosáin, Máire (1994). Irish palatalisation and the representation of place features. Phonology 11. 89–106.Google Scholar
Odden, David (1994). Adjacency parameters in phonology. Lg 70. 289–330.Google Scholar
Olson, Kenneth S. (2005). The phonology of Mono. Dallas: SIL International & University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye (2001). Contrast dispersion and Russian palatalization. In Hume & Johnson (2001). 187–218.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye (2003). Contrast and post-velar fronting in Russian. NLLT 21. 39–87.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole & Prunet, Jean-François (1991a). Coronal or velar placeless consonants? WCCFL 9. 427–441.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole & Prunet, Jean-François (eds.) (1991b). The special status of coronals: internal and external evidence. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Paulian, Christiane (1975). Le kukuya: langue teke du Congo. Paris: Société d'Etudes Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France.Google Scholar
Piggott, Glyne L. (1974). Aspects of Odawa morphophonemics. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Polański, Kazimierz (1993). Polabian. In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 795–824.Google Scholar
Polotsky, H. J. (1951). Notes on Gurage grammar. Jerusalem: The Israel Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S. (1993). Slovene. In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 388–451.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas (1988a). Underspecification, the feature hierarchy and Tiv vowels. Phonology 5. 299–326.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas (1988b). Vocalic underspecification in Yoruba. LI 19. 233–270.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. (1989). The role of coronal in articulator based features. CLS 25:1. 379–393.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel (1990). The articulatory characteristics of palatal consonants. JPh 18. 267–280.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Espinosa, Aina (2006). Articulatory, positional and contextual characteristics of palatal consonants: evidence from Majorcan Catalan. JPh 34. 295–318.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren & Avery, Peter (1991). On the relationship between laterality and coronality. In Paradis & Prunet (1991b). 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riese, Timothy (1998). Permian. In Abondolo (1998b). 249–275.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon (1994). Palatalization, underspecification, and plane conflation in Chaha. WCCFL 12. 101–116.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon (1997a). Featural morphology and dialect variation: the contribution of historical change. In Hinskens, Frans, van Hout, Roeland & Wetzels, W. Leo (eds.) Variation, change and phonological theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 231–266.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon (1997b). Theoretical issues in comparative Ethio-Semitic phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy (1993). The lexical phonology of Slovak. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy (2007). Feature geometry from the perspective of Polish, Russian, and Ukrainian. LI 38. 85–138.Google Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth (1986). The representation of features and relations in nonlinear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka (1998). Saamic. In Abondolo (1998b). 43–95.Google Scholar
Scatton, Ernest A. (1993). Bulgarian. In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 188–248.Google Scholar
Schein, Barry & Steriade, Donca (1986). On geminates. LI 17. 691–744.Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence & Tamori, Ikuhiro (1992). Palatalization in Japanese mimetics: response to Mester and Itô. Lg 68. 139–148.Google Scholar
Scobbie, James M. (1991). Attribute value phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Shaw, Patricia A. (1976). Theoretical issues in Dakota phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Shevelov, George Y. (1993). Ukrainian. In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 947–998.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi (1990). The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Short, David (1993a). Czech. In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 455–532.Google Scholar
Short, David (1993b). Slovak. In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 533–592.Google Scholar
Simoncsics, Péter (1998). Kamassian. In Abondolo (1998b). 580–601.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer (2002). Phonological augmentation in prominent positions. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul (1995). On the structure of the constraint component Con of UG. Paper presented at the University of Arizona, Tucson. Available as ROA-86 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul (1996). The initial state and ‘Richness of the Base’ in Optimality Theory. Ms, Johns Hopkins University. Available as ROA-154 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul (1997). Constraint interaction in generative grammar II: local conjunction or random rules in Universal Grammar. Paper presented at the Hopkins Optimality Theory Workshop 1997/University of Maryland Mayfest 1997.Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul (2006). Optimality in phonology II: harmonic completeness, local constraint conjunction, and feature domain markedness. In Smolensky, Paul & Legendre, Géraldine (eds.) The harmonic mind: from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar. Vol. 2: Linguistic and philosophical implications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 27–160.Google Scholar
Stanley, Richard (1967). Redundancy rules in phonology. Lg 43. 393–436.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1987a). Locality conditions and feature geometry. NELS 17. 595–617.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1987b). Redundant values. CLS 23:2. 339–362.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1995). Underspecification and markedness. In Goldsmith (1995). 114–174.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1999). Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 2: Papers in Phonology 3. 25–146.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth, Keyser, Samuel Jay & Kawasaki, Haruko (1986). Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features. In Perkell, Joseph S. & Klatt, Dennis H. (eds.) Invariance and variability in speech processes. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 426–449.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay (1989). Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Lg 65. 81–106.Google Scholar
Stone, Gerald (1993a). Cassubian. In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 759–794.Google Scholar
Stone, Gerald (1993b). Sorbian (Upper and Lower). In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 593–685.Google Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof, Tsendina, Anna, Karlsson, Anastasia & Franzén, Vivan (2005). The phonology of Mongolian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan (1993). Russian. In Comrie & Corbett (1993). 827–886.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko (2007). An introduction to Japanese linguistics. 2nd edn. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (2008). The sounds of Japanese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Viitso, Tiit-Rein (1998). Estonian. In Abondolo (1998b). 115–148.Google Scholar
Walker, Rachel (1998). Nasalization, neutral segments, and opacity effects. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Walsh Dickey, Laura (1997). The phonology of liquids. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard (2001). The phonology of /r/. In Hall (2001). 335–368.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (1988). The Obligatory Contour Principle and phonological rules: a loss of identity. LI 19. 65–100.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (2005). Variability in feature affiliations through violable constraints: the case of [lateral]. In van Oostendorp, Marc & de Weijer, Jeroen van (eds.) The internal organization of phonological segments. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 63–91.Google Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl (1996). Parsing below the segment in a constraint-based framework. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl (1997). Conflicting directionality. Phonology 14. 263–286.Google Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl (2004). Positional asymmetries and licensing. In McCarthy, John (ed.) Optimality Theory in phonology: a reader. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 365–378.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth C. (1995). An acoustic and electropalatographic study of lexical and postlexical palatalization in American English. In Connell & Arvaniti (1995). 282–302.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie (2007). The role of phonetic knowledge in phonological patterning: corpus and survey evidence from Tagalog infixation. Lg 83. 277–316.Google Scholar