Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:01:04.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: experimental evidence from Japanese*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2008

Sharon Peperkamp ,
Inga Vendelin  and
Kimihiro Nakamura
Sharon Peperkamp
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique (DEC-ENS, EHESS, CNRS)
Inga Vendelin
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique (DEC-ENS, EHESS, CNRS)
Kimihiro Nakamura
Affiliation:
University of Tokyo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Japanese shows an asymmetry in the treatment of word-final [n] in loanwords from English and French: while it is adapted as a moraic nasal consonant in loanwords from English, it is adapted with a following epenthetic vowel in loanwords from French. We provide experimental evidence that this asymmetry is due to phonetic differences in the realisation of word-final [n] in English and French, and, consequently, to the way in which English and French word-final [n] are perceived by native speakers of Japanese. Specifically, French but not English word-final [n] has a strong vocalic release that Japanese listeners perceive as their native vowel [ɯ]. We propose a psycholinguistic model in which most loanword adaptations originate in perceptual assimilation, a process which takes place during perception and which maps non-native sounds and sound structures onto the phonetically closest native ones. We compare our model to alternatives couched within phonological theory.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , May 2008 , pp. 129 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Allison N. (2006). Faithfulness and perception in loanword adaptation: a case study from Hawaiian. Lingua 116. 1024–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoyama, Katsura, Flege, James Emil, Guion, Susan G., Akahane-Yamada, Reiko & Yamada, Tsuneo (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: the case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. JPh 32. 233–250.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. (1985). The expanding syllabary of Hong Kong Cantonese. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 14. 99–111.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: a perceptual assimilation model. In Goodman, Judith & Nusbaum, Howard (eds.) The development of speech perception: the transition from speech sounds to spoken words. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 167–224.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. & Strange, Winifred (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. JPh 20. 305–330.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T., McRoberts, Gerald W. & Sithole, Nomathemba M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14. 345–360.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul (1999). On the need for a separate perception grammar. Ms, University of Amsterdam. Available as ROA-358 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Broselow, Ellen (2004a). Language contact phonology: richness of the stimulus, poverty of the base. NELS 34. 1–21.Google Scholar
Broselow, Ellen (2004b). Unmarked structures and emergent rankings in second language phonology. International Journal of Bilingualism 8. 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Clifford (in press). The role of loanword diffusion in changing adaptation patterns: a study of coronal stops in Japanese borrowings. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 16. 32–56.Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel (1985). Loanwords and phonological methodology. Ville LaSalle: Didier.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa (2007). The relationship between the perception of non-native phonotactics and loanword adaptation. Phonology 24. 261–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine, Dupoux, Emmanuel & Gout, Ariel (2000). Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: a cross-linguistic study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12. 635–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell, François (1973). E muet: fiction graphique ou réalité linguistique? In Anderson, Stephen & Kiparsky, Paul (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 26–50.Google Scholar
Dell, François (1995). Consonant clusters and phonological syllables in French. Lingua 95. 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, Emmanuel, Kakehi, Kazuhiko, Hirose, Yuki, Pallier, Christophe & Mehler, Jacques (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: a perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25. 1568–1578.Google Scholar
Dupoux, Emmanuel, Pallier, Christophe, Sebastián, Núria & Mehler, Jacques (1997). A destressing ‘deafness’ in French? Journal of Memory and Language 36. 406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, Emmanuel, Peperkamp, Sharon & Sebastián-Gallés, Núria (2001). A robust method to study stress ‘deafness’. JASA 110. 1606–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, Emmanuel, Sebastián-Gallés, Núria, Navarrete, Eduardo & Peperkamp, Sharon (2008). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: the case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition 106. 682–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James Emil, Takagi, Naoyuki & Mann, Virginia (1996). Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults' perception of /ʁ/ and /l/. JASA 99. 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandour, Jack (1983). Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. JPh 11. 149–175.Google Scholar
Gbéto, Flavien (2000). Les emprunts linguistiques d'origine européenne en Fon (Nouveau Kwa, Gbe: Bénin). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Goad, Heather & Brannen, Kathleen (2003). Phonetic evidence for phonological structure in syllabification. In Weijer, Jeroen, van Heuven, Vincent & Hulst, Harry (eds.) The phonological spectrum. Vol. 2: Suprasegmental structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golston, Chris & Yang, Phong (2001). White Hmong loanword phonology. In Féry, Caroline, Green, Antony & Vijver, Ruben (ed.) Proceedings of HILP 5. Potsdam: University of Potsdam. 40–57.Google Scholar
Goto, Hiromu (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds ‘L’ and ‘R’. Neuropsychologia 9. 317–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallé, Pierre A., Segui, Juan, Frauenfelder, Uli & Meunier, Christine (1998). Processing of illegal consonant clusters: a case of perceptual assimilation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24. 592–608.Google ScholarPubMed
Harris, John (1997). Licensing Inheritance: an integrated theory of neutralisation. Phonology 14. 315–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Einar (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Lg 26. 210–231.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar (1953). The Norwegian language in America: a study in bilingual behavior. Vol. 2: The American dialects of Norwegian. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Holden, Kyril (1976). Assimilation rates of borrowings and phonological productivity. Lg 52. 131–147.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (1970). The role of borrowing in the justification of phonological grammars. Studies in African Linguistics 1. 1–48.Google Scholar
Ito, Chiyuki, Kang, Yoonjung & Kenstowicz, Michael (2006). The adaptation of Japanese loanwords into Korean. In Hsieh, Feng-fan & Kenstowicz, Michael(eds.) Studies in loanword phonology (MITWPL 52). 65–104.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin (1995). Japanese phonology. In Goldsmith, John (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 817–838.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin (1999). The phonological lexicon. In Tsujimura (1999). 62–100.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin (2001). Covert generalizations in Optimality Theory: the role of stratal faithfulness constraints. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology 7. 273–299.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. (2005). The principling role of Korean in phonological adaptation. In Lee, Sang-Oak (ed.) The 30th anniversary publication of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics. Seoul: Pagijong. 141–159.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Lee, Ahrong (2006). Perception of contrast in Korean loanword adaptation. Korean Linguistics 13. 49–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Haike & Gussenhoven, Carlos (2000). Loan phonology: perception, salience, the lexicon and OT. In Dekkers, Joost, Leeuw, Frank & Weijer, Jeroen (eds.) Optimality Theory: phonology, syntax, and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquemot, Charlotte, Pallier, Christophe, LeBihan, Denis, Dehaene, Stanislas & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2003). Phonological grammar shapes the auditory cortex: a functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience 23. 9541–9546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, Hyunsook (1996). English loanwords in Korean. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology 2. Seoul: Hankwukmunhwasa. 21–47.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung (2003). Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean. Phonology 20. 219–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1990). Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7. 193–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael (2004). Review article: the role of perception in loanword phonology. (Review of Gbéto 2000.) Studies in African Linguistics 32. 95–112.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Sohn, Hyang-Sook (2001). Accentual adaptation in North Kyungsang Korean. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.) Ken Hale: a life in language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 239–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Suchato, Atiwong (2006). Issues in loanword adaptation: a case study from Thai. Lingua 116. 921–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Uffmann, Christian (eds.) (2006). Loanword phonology: current issues. Special issue. Lingua 116. 921–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Soohee & Curtis, Emily (2002). Phonetic duration of English /s/ and its borrowing in Korean. In Akatsuka, Noriko & Strauss, Susan (eds.) Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10. Palo Alto: CSLI. 406–419.Google Scholar
Kiriloff, C. (1969). On the auditory perception of tones in Mandarin. Phonetica 20. 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, Mariko (1997). Mechanisms of vowel devoicing in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (1999). Mora and syllable. In Tsujimura (1999). 31–61.Google Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97. 11850–11857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCharité, Darlene & Paradis, Carole (2005). Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. LI 36. 223–258.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi & Marslen-Wilson, William (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition 38. 245–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Lisa & Nusbaum, C. Howard (1993). Processing interactions between segmental and suprasegmental information in native speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese. Perception and Psychophysics 53. 157–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levelt, Willem J. M. (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M., Roelofs, Ardi & Meyer, Antje S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lively, Scott E., Logan, John S. & Pisoni, David B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. JASA 94. 1242–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovins, Julie (1975). Loanwords and the phonological structure of Japanese. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Massaro, Dominic W. & Cohen, Michael M. (1983). Phonological context in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 34. 338–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mielke, Jeff (2005). Modeling distinctive feature emergence. WCCFL 24. 281–289.Google Scholar
Mohanan, Tara & Mohanan, K. P. (2003). Towards a theory of constraints in OT: emergence of the not-so-unmarked in Malayalee English. Available as ROA-601 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Kimihiro & Dupoux, Emmanuel (in preparation). Perceptual epenthesis in Japanese-French bilinguals.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole (1992). Lexical phonology and morphology: the nominal classes in Fula. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole & LaCharité, Darlene (1997). Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation. JL 33. 379–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon (2005). A psycholinguistic theory of loanword adaptations. BLS 30. 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2003). Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: the role of perception. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: Causal Productions. 367–370.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, Sankoff, David & Miller, Christopher (1988). The social correlates and linguistic processes of lexical borrowing and assimilation. Linguistics 26. 47–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabiner, Lawrence & Juang, Biing-Hwang (1993). Fundamentals of speech recognition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Rose, Yvan (1999). A structural account of root node deletion in loanword phonology. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 44. 359–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi (1990). Japanese. In Comrie, Bernard (ed.) The world's major languages. London & Sydney: Croom Helm. 855–880.Google Scholar
Shinohara, Shigeko (1997). Analyse phonologique de l'adaptation japonaise de mots étrangers. PhD dissertation, Université de Paris III.Google Scholar
Shinohara, Shigeko (2000). Default accentuation and foot structure in Japanese: evidence from Japanese adaptations of French words. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9. 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinohara, Shigeko (2006). Perceptual effects in final cluster reduction patterns. Lingua 116. 1046–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicoli, Mark (2000). Loanwords and contact-induced phonological change in Lachixío Zapotec. BLS 25. 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Daniel (1992). Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9. 289–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer (2006). Loan phonology is not all perception: evidence from Japanese loan doublets. In Vance, Timothy & Jones, Kimberly (eds.) Japanese/Korean Linguistics 14. Palo Alto: CLSI. 63–74.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (2001). The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. Ms, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Takagi, Naoyuki & Mann, Virginia (1994). A perceptual basis for the systematic phonological correspondences between Japanese loan words and their English source words. JPh 22. 343–356.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard (1987). The sounds of French: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.) (1999). The handbook of Japanese linguistics. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Charles (1997). Loanword adaptation in Lama: testing the TCRS model. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 42. 415–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ussishkin, Adam & Wedel, Andrew (2003). Gestural motor programs and the nature of phonotactic restrictions: evidence from loanword phonology. WCCFL 22. 505–518.Google Scholar
Vendelin, Inga & Peperkamp, Sharon (2004). Evidence for phonetic adaptation of loanwords: an experimental study. Actes des Journées d'Etudes Linguistiques de l'Université de Nantes. 127–131.Google Scholar
Vendelin, Inga & Peperkamp, Sharon (2006). The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations. Lingua 116. 996–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, Janet F. & Richard, C. Tees (1984). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. JASA 75. 1866–1878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yip, Moira (1993). Cantonese loanword phonology and Optimality Theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2. 261–291.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (2002). Necessary but not sufficient: perceptual influences in loanword phonology. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 6:1. 4–21.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (2006). The symbiosis between perception and grammar in loanword phonology. Lingua 116. 950–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar