Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T23:51:13.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jan-Olof Svantesson, Anna Tsendina, Anastasia Karlsson and Vivan Franzén (2005). The phonology of Mongolian. (The Phonology of the World's Languages.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xix+314.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2009

Andrew Nevins
Andrew Nevins
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 525 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alderete, John, Beckman, Jill, Benua, Laura, Gnanadesikan, Amalia, McCarthy, John & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (1999). Reduplication with fixed segmentism. LI 30. 327–364.Google Scholar
Avery, Peter (1996). The representation of voicing contrasts. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (2008). Consonant epenthesis: natural and unnatural histories. In Good, Jeff (ed.) Linguistic universals and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, Lev & Toivonen, Ida (2009). A featural paradox in Votic harmony. Paper presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. (1997). Mostly predictable: cyclicity and the distribution of schwa in Itelmen. In Samiian, Vida (ed.) Proceedings of the 26th Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL). Fresno: Department of Linguistics, California State University, Fresno. 14–28. Available as ROA-208 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea (1988). Towards a theory of phonological alphabets. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Cenggeltei, & Sinedke, (1959). Monggol kelen-ü ündüsün egesig-üd-ün tuqai. [The basic vowels of Mongolian.] Öbör Monggol-un yeke surgaguli-yin erdem sinjilegen-ü sedgül: gün uqagan neyigem sinjilekü uqagan [Journal of Nei Mongol University: Philosophy and Social Sciences in Mongolian] 1959/2. 97–114.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Keyser, Samuel J. (1983). CV phonology: a generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fleischhacker, Heidi (2001). Cluster-dependent epenthesis asymmetries. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 7: Papers in Phonology 5. 71–116.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew K. (1999). The ‘neutral’ vowels of Finnish: how neutral are they? Linguistica Uralica 35. 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1980). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Howe, Darin (2004). Vocalic dorsality in Revised Articulator Theory. Ms, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko (1989). A prosodic theory of epenthesis. NLLT 7. 217–259.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Salmons, Joseph C. (1995). Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology 12. 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelepir, Meltem (2000). To be or not to be faithful. In Göksel, Aslɪ & Kerslake, Celia (eds.) Studies on Turkish and Turkic languages: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 11–18.Google Scholar
Kim, Yuni (2005). Finnish neutral vowels: subcontrastive harmony or V-to-V coarticulation? Paper presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Oakland.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1967). Yawelmani phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Susannah (2004). The representation of underlying glides: a cross-linguistic study. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Lindau, Mona (1979). The feature expanded. JPh 7. 163–176.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec (1982). Re reduplication. LI 13. 435–482.Google Scholar
Mönggöngerel, (1998). Naiman aman ayalgu. [The Naiman dialect.] Kökeqota: ÖMYS-yin keblel-ün qoriy-a.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew (in press). Locality in vowel harmony. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A. & Miller, M. F. (eds.) Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 178–203.Google Scholar
Petrova, Olga, Plapp, Rosemary, Ringen, Catherine & Szentgyörgyi, Szilárd (2006). Voice and aspiration: evidence from Russian, Hungarian, German, Swedish, and Turkish. The Linguistic Review 23. 1–35.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, G. John (1903). Das schriftmongolische und die Urgamundart phonetisch verglichen. Journal de la Société Finno-ougrienne 21:2. 1–56.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon (2000). Epenthesis positioning and syllable contact in Chaha. Phonology 17. 397–425.Google Scholar
Street, John C. (1963). Khalkha structure. Bloomington: Indiana University & The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof (1985). Vowel harmony shift in Mongolian. Lingua 67. 283–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur (1978). On the phonology of Icelandic preaspiration. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 1. 3–54.Google Scholar
Välimaa-Blum, Riitta (1999). A feature geometric description of Finnish vowel harmony covering both loans and native words. Lingua 108. 247–268.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert (1998). The laryngeal specifications of fricatives. LI 29. 497–511.Google Scholar
Wood, Sidney (1979). A radiographic analysis of constriction locations for vowels. JPh 7. 25–43.Google Scholar