Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:46:08.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gestural coordination of Italian word-initial clusters: the case of ‘impure s’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2013

Anne Hermes ,
Doris Mücke  and
Martine Grice
Anne Hermes
Affiliation:
University of Cologne
Doris Mücke
Affiliation:
University of Cologne
Martine Grice
Affiliation:
University of Cologne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We report on an articulatory study which uses an electromagnetic articulograph to investigate word-initial consonant clusters in Italian. In particular, we investigate clusters involving a sibilant, such as in spina ‘thorn’. The status of the sibilant in such clusters, referred to as ‘impure s’, is an unresolved problem for the syllable phonology of Italian. Coordination patterns of the gestural targets of consonantal and vocalic gestures reveal a structural difference between obstruent–liquid clusters, e.g. /pr/, and sibilant–obstruent clusters, e.g. /sp/. Whereas in /pr/, both /p/ and /r/ have distinct coordination patterns as compared to either /p/ or /r/ as a single consonant in the same (word-initial) position, this is not the case for /sp/. Here the /p/ patterns like a single consonant: /p/ in spina patterns with /p/ in Pina (proper name). Thus, although /s/ in spina constitutes a word onset, there is evidence against it being part of a syllable onset.

Type
Research Article
Information
Phonology , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , May 2013 , pp. 1 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

We would like to thank Louis Goldstein, Hosung Nam and Elina Savino for their generous advice at the conceptual stage. We are also grateful to three anonymous reviewers and the associate editor for constructive suggestions and comments, and to Franceso Cangemi and Jessica Di Napoli for helpful insights into the phonology of Italian.

References

REFERENCES

Absalom, Matthew & Hajek, John (1997). Raddoppiamento sintattico: what happens when the theory is on too tight? In Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Gaeta, Livio, Jetchev, Georgi & Michaels, David (eds.) Certamen Phonologicum III: papers from the 3rd Cortona Phonology Meeting. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier. 159–179.Google Scholar
Barlow, Jessica A. (2001). A preliminary typology of initial clusters in acquisition. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 15. 9–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basbøll, Hans (1989). Phonological weight and Italian raddoppiamento fonosintattico. Rivista di Linguistica 1. 5–31.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., Edwards, Jan & Fletcher, Janet (1992). Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. In Docherty, Gerard J. & Ladd, D. Robert (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco (2004). On the undecidable syllabification of /sC/ clusters in Italian: converging experimental evidence. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica 16. 349–372.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Loporcaro, Michele (2005). The sound pattern of Standard Italian, as compared with the varieties spoken in Florence, Milan and Rome. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35. 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Jeremy (2006). On the representational status of /s/-clusters. San Diego Linguistics Papers 2. 39–84.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 219–252.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis (1988). Some notes on syllable structure in articulatory phonology. Phonetica 45. 140–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis (1992). Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49. 155–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis (2000). Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Bulletin de la Communication Parlée 5. 25–34.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani (2000). Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica 57. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassidy, Steve & Harrington, Jonathan (2001). Multi-level annotation in the Emu speech database management system. Speech Communication 33. 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro (1986). Length, syllabification and the phonological cycle in Italian. Journal of Italian Linguistics 8. 5–33.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong & Keating, Patricia (2009). Effects of initial position versus prominence in English. JPh 37. 466–485.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary E. (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 283–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Lisa (2006). Phonotactics and articulatory coordination interact in phonology: evidence from nonnative production. Cognitive Science 30. 837–862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, Stuart (1990). Italian onset structure and the distribution of il and lo. Linguistics 28. 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, Kenneth J. (1995). The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. JASA 97. 491–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Imperio, Mariapaola & Fivela, Barbara Gili (2003). How many levels of phrasing? Evidence from two varieties of Italian. In Local, et al. (2003). 130–144.Google Scholar
Ewen, Colin J. & Botma, Bert (2009). Against rhymal adjuncts: the syllabic affiliation of English postvocalic consonants. In Nasukawa, Kuniya & Backley, Phillip (eds.) Strength relations in phonology. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 221–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. (2002). A grammar of gestural coordination. NLLT 20. 269–337.Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. & Goldstein, Louis (2012). Articulatory representation and organization. In Cohn, Abigail C., Fougeron, Cécile & Huffman, Marie K. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 220–231.Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I., Hoole, Philip, Roon, Kevin & Zeroual, Chakir (2010). Variation in overlap and phonological grammar in Moroccan Arabic clusters. In Fougeron, Cécile, Kühnert, Barbara, D'Imperio, Mariapaola & Vallée, Nathalie (eds.) Laboratory phonology 10. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 657–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierut, Judith A. (1999). Syllable onsets: clusters and adjuncts in acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42. 708–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goad, Heather (2011). The representation of sC clusters. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 898–923.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John (1976). An overview of autosegmental phonology. Linguistic Analysis 2. 23–68.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Louis (2011). Back to the past tense in English. In Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo, Mikkelsen, Line & Potsdam, Eric (eds.) Representing language: essays in honor of Judith Aissen. Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center. 69–88.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Louis, Byrd, Dani & Saltzman, Elliot (2006). The role of vocal tract gestural action units in understanding the evolution of phonology. In Arbib, Michael A. (ed.) Action to language via the mirror neuron system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 215–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Louis, Chitoran, Ioana & Selkirk, Elizabeth (2007). Syllable structure as coupled oscillator modes: evidence from Georgian vs. Tashlhiyt Berber. In Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Saarbrücken: Saarland University. 241–244.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Louis, Nam, Hosung, Saltzman, Elliot & Chitoran, Ioana (2009). Coupled oscillator planning model of speech timing and syllable structure. In Fant, G., Fujisaki, H. & Shen, J. (eds.) Frontiers in phonetics and speech science: Festschrift for Wu Zongji. Beijing: Commercial Press. 239–249.Google Scholar
Grice, Martine, D'Imperio, Mariapaola, Savino, Michelina & Avesani, Cinzia (2005). Strategies for intonation labelling across varieties of Italian. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 362–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haken, Hermann, Kelso, J. A. Scott & Bunz, Heinz (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics 51. 347–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, Tracy Alan (1992). Syllable structure and syllable-related processes in German. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan (2003). Consonant strengthening and lengthening in various languages: comments on three papers. In Local, et al. . (2003). 183–193.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Fletcher, Janet & Beckman, Mary E. (2000). Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English. In Broe, Michael B. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology V: acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 40–51.Google Scholar
Harris, John (1994). English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hermes, Anne, Grice, Martine, Mücke, Doris & Niemann, Henrik (2008). Articulatory indicators of syllable affiliation in word initial consonant clusters in Italian. Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production, Strasbourg. 433–436.Google Scholar
Hermes, Anne, Grice, Martine, Mücke, Doris & Niemann, Henrik (2012). Articulatory coordination and the syllabification of word initial consonant clusters in Italian. In Hoole, Philip, Bombien, Lasse, Pouplier, Marianne, Mooshammer, Christine & Kühnert, Barbara (eds.) Consonant clusters and structural complexity. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 155–176.Google Scholar
Hermes, Anne, Ridouane, Rachid, Mücke, Doris & Grice, Martine (2011). Kinematics of syllable structure in Tashlhiyt Berber: the case of vocalic and consonantal nuclei. Proceedings of the 9th International Seminar on Speech Production, Montreal. 401–408.Google Scholar
Honorof, Douglas N. & Browman, Catherine P. (1995). The center or edge: how are consonant clusters organized with respect to the vowel? In Elenius, Kjell & Branderud, Peter (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Vol. 4. Stockholm: KTH & Stockholm University. 552–555.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan (1992). Do you believe in magic? The story of s+C sequences. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 2. 293–313.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1990). Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7. 193–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, Martin (2009). The phonology of Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepschy, Anna Laura & Lepschy, Giulio (1977). The Italian language today. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Local, John, Ogden, Richard & Temple, Rosalind (eds.) (2003). Phonetic interpretation: papers in laboratory phonology VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele (1997a). L'origine del raddoppiamento fonosintattico: saggio di fonologia diacronica romanza. Basle & Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele (1997b). Lengthening and raddoppiamento fonosintattico. In Maiden, Martin & Parry, Mair (eds.) The dialects of Italy. London & New York: Routledge. 41–51.Google Scholar
McCrary, Kristie M. (2004). Reassessing the role of the syllable in Italian phonology: an experimental study of consonant cluster syllabification, definite article allomorphy and segment duration. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Marin, Stefania (2011). Organization of complex onsets in Romanian. Proceedings of the 9th International Seminar on Speech Production, Montreal. 179–186.Google Scholar
Marin, Stefania & Pouplier, Marianne (2010). Temporal organization of complex onsets and codas in American English: testing the predictions of a gesture coupling model. Motor Control 14. 380–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marotta, Giovanna (1986). Rhythmical constraints on ‘syntactic doubling’. Journal of Italian Linguistics 8. 35–52.Google Scholar
Nam, Hosung (2007). Syllable-level intergestural timing model: split-gesture dynamics focusing on positional asymmetry and moraic structure. In Cole, Jennifer & Hualde, José Ignacio (eds.) Laboratory phonology 9. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 483–506.Google Scholar
Nam, Hosung, Goldstein, Louis & Saltzman, Elliot (2009). Self-organization of syllable structure: a coupled oscillator model. In Pellegrino, François, Marisco, Egidio, Chitoran, Ioana & Coupé, Christophe (eds.) Approaches to phonological complexity. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 299–328.Google Scholar
Nam, Hosung & Saltzman, Elliot (2003). A competitive, coupled oscillator model of syllable structure. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: Causal Productions. 2253–2256.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene (1982). Prosodic domains of external sandhi rules. In Hulst, Harry van der & Smith, Norval (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. Part I. Dordrecht: Foris. 225–255.Google Scholar
Pan, Ning & Snyder, William (2004). Acquisition of /s/-initial clusters: a parametric approach. In Brugos, Alejna, Micciulla, Linnea & Smith, Christine E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla. 436–446.Google Scholar
Payne, Elinor M. (2005). Phonetic variation in Italian consonant gemination. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35. 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouplier, Marianne (2012). The gestural approach to syllable structure: universal, language- and cluster-specific aspects. In Fuchs, Susanne, Weirich, Melanie, Pape, Daniel & Perrier, Pascal (eds.) Speech planning and dynamics. Frankfurt am Main: Lang. 63–96.Google Scholar
Repetti, Lori (1991). A moraic analysis of raddoppiamento fonosintattico. Rivista di Linguistica 3. 307–330.Google Scholar
Repetti, Lori (2012). Consonant-final loanwords and epenthetic vowels in Italian. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 11. 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheer, Tobias (2004). A lateral theory of phonology. Vol. 1: What is CVCV, and why should it be? Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Jason A., Gafos, Adamantios I., Hoole, Philip & Zeroual, Chakir (2009). Syllabification in Moroccan Arabic: evidence from patterns of temporal stability in articulation. Phonology 26. 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Jason A., Gafos, Adamantios I., Hoole, Philip & Zeroual, Chakir (2011). Dynamic invariance in the phonetic expression of syllable structure: a case study of Moroccan Arabic consonant clusters. Phonology 28. 455–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turvey, M. T. (1990). Coordination. American Psychologist 45. 938–953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiese, Richard (1996). The phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar