Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-xrnlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:58:45.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

David Embick (2010). Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 60.) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Pp. xii+218.

Review products

David Embick (2010). Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 60.) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Pp. xii+218.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2011

Eulàlia Bonet
Eulàlia Bonet
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , December 2011 , pp. 526 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bonet, Eulàlia & Harbour, Daniel (forthcoming). Contextual allomorphy. In Trommer, Jochen (ed.) The morphology and phonology of exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia, Lloret, Maria-Rosa & Mascaró, Joan (2007). Allomorph selection and lexical preference: two case studies. Lingua 117. 903–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bye, Patrick (2007). Allomorphy – selection, not optimization. In Blaho, Sylvia, Bye, Patrik & Krämer, Martin (eds.) Freedom of analysis? Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 63–91.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Embick, David & Marantz, Alec (2008). Architecture and blocking. LI 39. 1–53.Google Scholar
Kager, René (1996). On affix allomorphy and syllable counting. In Kleinhenz, Ursula (ed.) Interfaces in phonology. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 155–171.Google Scholar
Mascaró, Joan (2007). External allomorphy and lexical representation. LI 38. 715–735.Google Scholar
Mester, Armin (1994). The quantitative trochee in Latin. NLLT 12. 1–61.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew (2011). Phonologically conditioned allomorph selection. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 2357–2382.Google Scholar
Paster, Mary (2006). Phonological conditions on affixation. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar