No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
David Embick (2010). Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 60.) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Pp. xii+218.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 December 2011
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
References
REFERENCES
Bonet, Eulàlia & Harbour, Daniel (forthcoming). Contextual allomorphy. In Trommer, Jochen (ed.) The morphology and phonology of exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia, Lloret, Maria-Rosa & Mascaró, Joan (2007). Allomorph selection and lexical preference: two case studies. Lingua 117. 903–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bye, Patrick (2007). Allomorphy – selection, not optimization. In Blaho, Sylvia, Bye, Patrik & Krämer, Martin (eds.) Freedom of analysis? Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 63–91.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kager, René (1996). On affix allomorphy and syllable counting. In Kleinhenz, Ursula (ed.) Interfaces in phonology. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 155–171.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew (2011). Phonologically conditioned allomorph selection. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 2357–2382.Google Scholar
Paster, Mary (2006). Phonological conditions on affixation. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar