Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:58:33.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vowel-length contrasts and phonetic cues to stress: an investigation of their relation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2017

Anya Lunden ,
Jessica Campbell ,
Mark Hutchens  and
Nick Kalivoda
Anya Lunden*
Affiliation:
College of William and Mary
Jessica Campbell*
Affiliation:
College of William and Mary
Mark Hutchens*
Affiliation:
College of William and Mary
Nick Kalivoda*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
*
E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected].
E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected].
E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected].
E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The functional load hypothesis of Berinstein (1979) put forward the idea that languages which use a suprasegmental property (duration, F0) contrastively will not use it to realise stress. The functional load hypothesis is often cited when stress correlates are discussed, both when it is observed that the language under discussion follows the hypothesis and when it fails to follow it. In the absence of a more wide-ranging assessment of how frequently languages do or do not conform to the functional load hypothesis, it is unknown whether it is an absolute, a strong tendency, a weak tendency or unsupported. The results from a database of reported stress correlates and use of contrastive duration for 140 languages are presented and discussed. No support for the functional load hypothesis is found.

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , December 2017 , pp. 565 - 580
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The Stress Correlate Database has benefited from many additional researchers and assistants from 2011 to 2016 that has allowed it to reach its current form. Listed chronologically, they are: Sara Carter, Rachel Nabulsi, Lindsay Baldovin, Kylie Ehlers, Kelly Luo and Diana Worthen. The authors also thank Anna Henshaw, as well as Kim Love, of K. R. Love Quantitative Consulting and Collaboration, for consultation regarding aspects of the statistical tests reported here.

References

REFERENCES

Beckman, Mary E. & Edwards, Jan (1994). Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In Keating, Patricia A. (ed.) Phonological structure and phonetic form: papers in laboratory phonology III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7–33.Google Scholar
Berinstein, Ava E. (1979). A cross-linguistic study on the perception and production of stress. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 47. 1–59.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (2001). Nhanda: an aboriginal language of Western Australia. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Dillmann, August (1907). Ethiopic grammar. 2nd edn, enlarged and improved by Carl Bezold. Translated by Crichton, James A.. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1988). A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Du, Jingyi (2010). Towards a grammar of the Usen dialect of the Barok language: New Ireland, Papua New Guinea. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
Eatough, Andrew (1999). Central Hill Nisenan texts with grammatical sketch. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. JASA 27. 765–768.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1. 126–152.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2004). A phonological and phonetic study of word-level stress in Chickasaw. IJAL 70. 1–32.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2014). Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: a typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.) Word stress: theoretical and typological issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth (1997). Vowel preservation in Leti. Oceanic Linguistics 31. 65–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth, Muller, Jennifer & van Engelhoven, Aone (1997). Non-moraic geminates in Leti. Phonology 14. 371–402.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (1977). On the nature of linguistic stress. In Hyman, Larry M. (ed.) Studies in stress and accent. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California. 37–82.Google Scholar
Kroeker, Menno (2001). A descriptive grammar of Nambikuara. IJAL 67. 1–87.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liljegren, Henrik (2008). Towards a grammatical description of Palula: an Indo-Aryan language of the Hindu Kush. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. JASA 35. 1773–1781.Google Scholar
Łukaszewicz, Beata (2015). Polish rhythmic stress revisited: phonetic evidence of an iterative system. Poster presented at Phonetics and Phonology in Europe, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lunden, Anya & Kalivoda, Nick (2017). Stress correlate database. Available (August 2017) at http://wmpeople.wm.edu/site/page/sllund/stresscorrelatedatabase.Google Scholar
Lynch, John (2000). A grammar of Anejom̃. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Martin, Jack B. (2011). A grammar of Creek (Muskogee) . Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Rich, F. (1963). Arabela phonemes and high-level phonology. In Studies in Peruvian Indian languages. Vol. 1. Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics. 193–206.Google Scholar
Rosero, Michael Wilson I. (2014). A grammatical sketch of Masbatenyo. BA thesis, University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Rozelle, Lorna (1997). The effect of stress on vowel length in Aleut. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 95. 91–101.Google Scholar
Sapir, J. David (1965). A grammar of Diola-Fogny: a language spoken in the Basse-Casamance region of Senegal. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shukla, Shaligram (1981). Bhojpuri grammar. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Sluijter, Agaath M. C. & van Heuven, Vincent J. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. JASA 100. 2471–2485.Google Scholar
Snapp, Allen, Anderson, John & Anderson, Joy (1982). Northern Paiute. In Langacker, Ronald W. (ed.) Studies in Uto-Aztecan grammar. Vol. 3: Uto-Aztecan grammatical sketches. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics & University of Texas at Arlington. 1–92.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. & House, Arthur S. (1963). Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: an acoustical study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 6. 111–128.Google Scholar
Suomi, Kari, Toivanen, Juhani & Ylitalo, Riikka (2003). Durational and tonal correlates of accent in Finnish. JPh 31. 113–138.Google Scholar
Suttles, Wayne (2004). Musqueam reference grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Taff, Alice, Rozelle, Lorna, Cho, Taehong, Ladefoged, Peter, Dirks, Moses & Wegelin, Jacob (2001). Phonetic structures of Aleut. JPh 29. 231–271.Google Scholar
Thornes, Timothy J. (2003). A Northern Paiute grammar with texts. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Titze, Ingo R. (1989). On the relation between subglottal pressure and fundamental frequency in phonation. JASA 85. 901–906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turk, Alice (2012). The temporal implementation of prosodic structure. In Cohn, Abigail C., Fougeron, Cécile & Huffman, Marie K. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 242–253.Google Scholar
Ultan, Russell (1967). Konkow grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene, Athanasopoulou, Angeliki & Pincus, Nadya (2015). Acoustic properties of prominence in Hungarian and the Functional Load Hypothesis. In Kiss, Katalin É., Surányi, Balázs & Dékány, Éva (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian. Vol. 14. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Irene, Athanasopoulou, Angeliki & Pincus, Nadya (2016). Prominence, contrast and the Functional Load Hypothesis: an acoustic investigation. In Heinz, Jeffrey, Goedemans, Rob & van der Hulst, Harry (eds.) Dimensions of phonological stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 123–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Laurence & Mády, Katalin (2008). The long and the short and the final: phonological vowel length and prosodic timing in Hungarian. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008. 363–366. Available (August 2017) at http://isle.illinois.edu/sprosig/sp2008/papers/id120.pdf.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Lunden et al supplementary material

Lunden et al supplementary material 1

Download Lunden et al supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 182.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Lunden et al supplementary material

Lunden et al supplementary material 2

Download Lunden et al supplementary material(File)
File 134.4 KB