Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:54:34.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rhythmical variation in Hungarian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2002

László Varga
Affiliation:
Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest

Abstract

The kinds of rhythmical variation I will examine in this paper can be observed in some double-accented Hungarian words, and can be exemplified by the changes that the stressing of the numeric compound ′tizen′három ‘thirteen’ may undergo when it is embedded in phrases. The stressing of this word may become tizenhárom in the phrase ′pont tizen′három ‘exactly thirteen’ and ′ tizen′három in the phrase ′ tizen′hárompont ‘thirteen points’. The two processes, however, are not quite symmetrical in their range of application; the first kind of change occurs in only a subset of the words affected by the second kind. The symbol ′ in the examples represents a pitch accent on the syllable whose orthographic form it precedes.

These changes are the Hungarian counterparts of the two kinds of rhythmical variation in English, manifested, for instance, by the different realisations of the word ′thir′teen, when it is embedded in phrases like ′thirteenpoints or ′just thir′teen. However, while rhythmical variation in English is extremely widespread, in Hungarian it is restricted to certain classes of words. Besides, rhythmical variation in English lacks the asymmetry between the two processes; both kinds of change affect the same set of words.

This article concentrates on rhythmical variation in Hungarian and on the implications of this variation for metrical theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I should like to thank my colleagues Á. Nádasdy, P. Siptár, P. Szigetvári and M. Törkenczy for their comments on earlier drafts of this article, and to participants at workshops at the Eötvös Loránd University of Budapest and Kossuth Lajos University of Debrecen, at which I presented parts of this study between 1994 and 1997. I am particularly indebted to two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor for the critical comments and valuable suggestions they offered concerning the first version of this article.