Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:40:09.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nasal reduplication in Mbe affixation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2002

Rachel Walker
Rachel Walker
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is well known that though reduplicative morphemes generally fill their content through copy from a base stem, some also display a portion of fixed material. Understanding the source of such fixed segmentism in reduplication has been a matter of controversy and the subject of ongoing research in phonological theory. A long-standing theoretical approach has attributed any fixed content to prespecified material (Marantz 1982, Yip 1982 and subsequent developments; see Alderete et al. 1999 for an overview). However, more recent work has presented an alternative. A fruitful line of inquiry has stemmed from the notion that fixed content in reduplicative affixation can be explained without prespecification, through the activity of phonological constraints that are well integrated into the phonotactics and segmental-featural system of the language (McCarthy & Prince 1994b, 1995, Urbanczyk 1996a, b, Spaelti 1997, Alderete et al. 1999). Alongside the issue of fixed segmentism stands the question whether templatic structures are required to determine the size and shape of reduplicative affixes or whether such properties can be made to follow from general constraints on prosodic structure (see work cited above; also McCarthy & Prince 1994a, Prince 1997, Gafos 1998a, b, Urbanczyk 1998; with foundation from McCarthy & Prince 1986, 1990).

This paper brings a study of Mbe affixation to bear on these issues.

Type
Research Article
Information
Phonology , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , May 2000 , pp. 65 - 115
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper has benefited significantly from the comments and suggestions of Jaye Padgett, John Alderete, Diamandis Gafos, Junko Itô, John McCarthy, Armin Mester, Sharon Rose, Philip Spaelti, Suzanne Urbanczyk and three anonymous Phonology reviewers, as well as audience members at WCCFL 17 at the University of British Columbia and members of phonology groups at the University of Southern California, University of California, Santa Cruz and University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Special thanks to John McCarthy for first bringing the Mbe data to my attention and to Akin Akinlabi for help in tracking down source material. Any errors in this work are my own. This research was supported in part by fellowship 752-93-2397 from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and grant SBR-9510868 from the National Science Foundation.