Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:54:34.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ken Lodge (2009). Fundamental concepts in phonology: sameness and difference. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Pp. vii+160.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2011

Leendert Plug
Leendert Plug
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , May 2011 , pp. 148 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avery, Peter, Dresher, B. Elan & Rice, Keren (eds.) (2008). Contrast in phonology: theory, perception, acquisition. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bye, Patrik (2007). Grade alternation in Inari Saami and abstract declarative phonology. In Toivonen, Ida & Nelson, Diane (eds.) Saami linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 53–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, John (1992). The phonetic interpretation of headed phonological structures containing overlapping constituents. Phonology 9. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, John (1998). Phonological representations: their names, forms and powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, John (2002). Phonetic representations in the mental lexicon. In Durand, Jacques & Laks, Bernard (eds.) Phonetics, phonology, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 96–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1948). Sounds and prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society. 127–152. Reprinted in Palmer (1970). 1–26.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In Studies in linguistic analysis (Special volume of the Philological Society). Oxford: Blackwell. 1–32.Google Scholar
Fudge, Erik (1969). Syllables. JL 5. 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. (ed.) (1995). The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith (2007). Decisions and mechanisms in exemplar-based phonology. In Solé, Maria-Josep, Beddor, Patrice Speeter & Ohala, Manjari (eds.) Experimental approaches to phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, John & Local, John (1989). Doing phonology: observing, recording, interpreting. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Local, John (2003). Variable domains and variable relevance: interpreting phonetic exponents. JPh 31. 321–339.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff (2008). The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morén, Bruce (2006). Consonant–vowel interactions in Serbian: features, representations and constraint interactions. Lingua 116. 1198–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Richard (1999a). A declarative account of strong and weak auxiliaries in English. Phonology 16. 55–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Richard (1999b). A syllable-level feature in Finnish. In Hulst, Harry van der & Ritter, Nancy (eds.) The syllable: views and facts. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 651–672.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank (ed.) (1970). Prosodic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel (2006). A critical introduction to phonology: of sound, mind, and body. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Simpson, Adrian P. (1998). Accounting for the phonetics of German r without processes. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 11. 91–104.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca (2007). Contrast. In de Lacy, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar