Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:51:28.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diacritic extrametricality vs. diacritic accent: a reply to Hammond*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Steven Franks
Steven Franks
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although primary word stress regularly falls on the penult in Polish and on the antepenult in Macedonian, there are a number of lexical exceptions in both languages. In the first generative treatment of such exceptions, Comrie (1976) suggested two unrelated diacritic features, [± stressable] for Polish and [ ± never posttonic] for Macedonian, in order to accommodate the accentual paradigms exhibited by exceptional words within the framework of Chomsky & Halle (1968). More recently, metrical accounts of exceptional stress have been proposed in Franks (1985), Halle & Vergnaud (1987) and Rubach & Booij (1985) for Polish and in Franks (1987, forthcoming) and Halle & Vergnaud (1987) for Macedonian. These analyse deviations from the regular patterns in the two languages in completely unrelated ways – in Polish exceptional stress is a consequence of idiosyncratic extrametricality, whereas in Macedonian it results from the idiosyncratic presence of an inherent accent. Responding to this type of analysis, Hammond (1989) argues that an alternative treatment in which exceptional stress in both languages is treated similarly is conceptually more elegant and descriptively superior. He accomplishes this by employing roughly the same set of stress rules for Polish and Macedonian, with the exception that lexical accent is interpreted differently in the two languages.

Type
Squibs and replies
Information
Phonology , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , May 1991 , pp. 145 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cohn, A. (1989). Stress in Indonesian and bracketting paradoxes. NLLT 1. 167–216.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Irregular stress in Polish and Macedonian. International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1. 227–240.Google Scholar
Doroszewski, W. (1973). Slownik poprawnej polszczyzny. Warzaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukove..Google Scholar
Frank, S. (1985). Extrametricality and stress in Polish. LI 15. 144–151.Google Scholar
Frank, S. (1987). Regular and irregular stress in Macedonian. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 35–36. 93–142.Google Scholar
Frank, S. (1989). The monosyllabic head effect. NLLT 7. 551–563.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (1990). Vowel-zero alternations and syllable-counting morphology. Indiana Slavic Studies 5. 81–98.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (forthcoming). Stress assignment and cliticization in Macedonian. Makedonski Jazik.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1986). The obligatory-branching parameter in metrical theory. NLLT 4. 185–228.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1989). Lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish. Phonology 6. 19–38.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. & Puppel, S. (1984). On the rhythm rule in Polish. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.) Advances in nonlinear phonology. Dordrecht: Foris. 59–81.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1990). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. LI 20. 253–306.Google Scholar
Melvold, J. (1987). Cyclicity and Russian stress. NELS 17:2. 467–481.Google Scholar
Rubach, J. (1986). Abstract vowels in three-dimensional phonology: the yers. The Linguistic Review 5. 247–280.Google Scholar
Rubach, J. & Booij, G. (1985). A grid theory of stress in Polish. Lingua 66. 281–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubach, J. & Booij, G. (1990). Syllable structure assignment in Polish. Phonology 7. 121–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topolińska, S. (1961). Z historii akcentu polskiego wieku XVI do dziś. Wroclaw: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar