Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T18:16:23.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Philosophers of the Oxford Movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Extract

This year is being celebrated by a large number of our fellow-countrymen as the centenary of a movement, associated with the name of the University of Oxford, of which, although in its first stage it might easily be mistaken—and has often been mistaken—for a mere wave of theological and ecclesiastical reaction within the Established Church of England, the attentive historian of the nineteenth century must take account as in fact a very powerful influence in the religious and, no less really though to a less degree, in the social and political life of the whole nation. Considerable, however, as is the importance which may justly be attributed in other respects to what is known as the Oxford Movement, the professed student of philosophy may be excused if he is chiefly struck by the apparent remoteness of its original leaders from the currents of speculative thought characteristic of the period in which it began its course. There were perhaps among them only two who can be named as contributors to philosophical literature in the technical sense now commonly borne by the term “philosophical”; and the contributions even of these two can scarcely be said to have taken their place among the works to which an ordinary teacher of philosophy would be likely to direct the attention of his pupils. To these two, however, John Henry Newman and William George Ward, I propose to devote here a few pages which may be found not without interest to readers of Philosophy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 274 note 1 Pattison, , Memoirs, p. 210.Google Scholar

page 275 note 1 Letters and Correspondence, vol. ii, p. 27.Google Scholar

page 275 note 2 Lilly, , Essays and Speeches, p. 97.Google Scholar

page 276 note 1 Letters, ii. p. 39 n.

page 274 note 2 Lilly, loc. supra cit.

page 277 note 1 Introd., § 21.

page 277 note 2 Hist. Eccles., i. 2.

page 278 note 1 Essay on Development, i, § 1.

page 278 note 2 Grammar of Assent, c. 8.

page 278 note 3 Ibid., c. 9, § 2.

page 279 note 1 Logic, ii. 3, §3.

page 279 note 2 Grammar of Assent, c. 8, §2.

page 279 note 3 Ibid., §3.

page 280 note 1 Principles of Logic, 2nd ed., vol. i, p. 384.Google Scholar

page 281 note 1 Grammar of Assent, c. 8, § 3.

page 281 note 2 Ibid., c. 9, § 2.

page 281 note 3 Ibid., c. 9, § 3.

page 282 note 1 Remains, i. p. 84.

page 282 note 2 Ward, Wilfrid, William George Ward and the Oxford Movement, p. xi.Google Scholar

page 284 note 1 Essays and Addresses, 1st Series, p. 280.

page 284 note 2 Cp. the writer’s Religious Thought in the Oxford Movement (S.P.C.K., 1928).