No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Séance with an Immortal
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 September 2006
Abstract
To understand death, you need to compare mortality with immortality. I am here to help. In addition to my personal testimony, I present highlights from a survey of immortal species and a survey of infinitistic varieties of mortality. These field studies rebut Fredrich Nietzsche’s thesis that immortality is inevitably repetitious, Bernard Williams’ allegation that immortality is inevitably boring, and Epicurus’ thesis that death cannot be bad for you. On the positive side, the study shows that the main difference between immortality and mortality are quantitative. Attention is also given to some striking qualitative differences.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- 2006 The Royal Institute of Philosophy